Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So the DOJ acknowledges that the Bush War Criminals are guilty of crimes! [View all]Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)159. Thanks, Bobbie Jo
And you're right in that the squawking and back-patting still goes on, facts being expendable if and when convenient.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
165 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So the DOJ acknowledges that the Bush War Criminals are guilty of crimes! [View all]
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
OP
What is an 'ODSers'?? Enquiring minds would like to know what insult is being
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#72
Thanks, it's hard to keep up the epithets being invented for Democrats on this
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#74
No, ODS refers to someone who will irrationally believes anything that puts Obama in a bad light.
uhnope
Aug 2013
#95
Your back and forth with Summer H. shows your argument is impenetrable to facts
uhnope
Aug 2013
#162
Summer H. has no idea what she is talking about regarding this case. My 'motivation'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#164
Really? Then why is it being used here on a Democratic forum against Democrats who
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#107
They always take these legal situations and twist them into something they are not
treestar
Aug 2013
#99
I know we can't give up. But with new revelation, 'impeachment is off the table'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#14
Funny, you sound a lot like a right wing infiltrator with the TP "Dems as bad as GOP"
uhnope
Aug 2013
#163
You just hurled a personal attack at me. I don't know you. Explain that insult please or
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#165
Starting wars based on lies that kill hundreds of thousands is just part of their job description.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#10
Very *few people* across the Globe know enough of how American politics works.
Amonester
Aug 2013
#25
I don't believe that at all. Americans know very little about the news anywhere
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#26
A very small 'fringe' of dreamers in the overall picture (of 7 billion humans) protests.
Amonester
Aug 2013
#119
It is the 'dreamers' as you call them, who have consistently changed the world. Conservatives
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#133
How is asking that they have to pay out in a lawsuit for what they did BECAUSE
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#149
I have the same principles I had when Bush was occupying the WH. I haven't changed one
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#143
President Truman had a sign on his desk in the Oval Office that read, "The buck stops here!"
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#28
So, in theory, Bush was just following orders? Wait a minute, wasn't he the Commander-in-Chief?
Coyotl
Aug 2013
#29
I think the point that this war was planned before they took office is startlingly legitimate
Samantha
Aug 2013
#33
I hate it that victims have to take civil action to even have their voices heard...
Violet_Crumble
Aug 2013
#52
I haven't seen that, thanks for the link I will definitely watch it later when I
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#54
If the DOJ is granted its request for immunity, the judge will do nothing of the kind. The
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#116
It might be better for your own sake if you refrained from posting 'what Sid thinks'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#48
Why are victims of Bush War Crimes forced to try to get justice in Civil Suits?
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#53
Her civil suit, and I'm really surprised you're actually acknowledging it is a civil suit...
SidDithers
Aug 2013
#66
How would I have it done? The same way it is done for every defendant in a lawsuit.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#111
She already dealt with that in her Complaint, she anticipated this 'spin' that she
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#154
Haven't read the DOJ's resonse asking for immunity either. Didn't see the claim that the
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#115
This comment is ALL ABOUT ME! Lol! While I'm always flattered to be the focus of attention
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#110
Do you know what this OP is about? The Bush cabal have been sued by a victim of their
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#113
Yes, exactly. And it didn't work too well back then. The plaintiff in this case
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#65
Where are the Criminal Charges?? And why should it apply to ANY case involving the Bush
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#117
She addressed that in her complaint. She explained why the immunity claim doesn't apply
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#132
I understand that, now. At one time not so long ago, I was naive enough to believe that they
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#141
''Money trumps peace.'' -- George Walker Bush*, ''president'' of the United States, Feb. 14, 2007
Octafish
Aug 2013
#86
And that was some crack legal response. But thank you anyhow. I guess you don't have any
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#127
Yes, we most certainly did hear it from the DOJ. Still haven't read their response?
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#160
Yes, that was a very interesting way of putting it. So who is this US Government that
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#157