Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Members of Congress call for Syria strike- Members of USA call for Congressmen to STFU. [View all]MFrohike
(1,980 posts)20. Boxed me in quite nicely, don't you think?
Of course, there's a difference between suggestive evidence and clear evidence. Clear evidence would require residue testing, I believe, which I do hope that UN team will be doing. Until then, reserving judgment is the only smart choice. Anything else could lead people to think one is hysterical.
As for my assumptions, allow me to use "clear evidence" to explain them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023524905#post85 <---bit more than just cordoning off things
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023524905#post170 <---this is what I called trying to manipulate using emotion
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Members of Congress call for Syria strike- Members of USA call for Congressmen to STFU. [View all]
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
OP
I think we should wait to hear from the UN inspection team--they were only granted access today.
MADem
Aug 2013
#1
I have a little difficulty 'relaxing' when I see so many little kids lying dead in their shrouds.
MADem
Aug 2013
#8
Actually, you started some shit about this being right out of 2003. There are some stark differences
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#14
You have a vivid imagination/chip on your shoulder & I don't even recognize your username….
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#18
What debate? There is no debate about the use of chemical weapons--it's a bad thing to do.
MADem
Aug 2013
#17
I am entirely calm. The answer to a problem--like the deployment of CW--is not "Ignore it."
MADem
Aug 2013
#24
I just can't get into this with you. TLDR, as the kids say. You're interested in fighting, I'm
MADem
Aug 2013
#26
What point? That your outrage and morality are situational? That you can "look away?"
MADem
Aug 2013
#36
There were people here who would have supported war against Iraq, if UN approved it.
David__77
Aug 2013
#13
No it will not. You are not arguing your case based on any understanding of how these weapons are
MADem
Aug 2013
#43
Rummy said Iraq would be a few weeks, max. And UN Peacekeepers keep the peace so there has to
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#51
The American Sheep haven't experienced the "incubator cord" incident du jour
libdem4life
Aug 2013
#7
"Swift action" against Syria, but no food stamp program because they're on vacation
bhikkhu
Aug 2013
#28
so, Representative Engel, you cool with putting your son or daughter's body on the line ?
steve2470
Aug 2013
#37