Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
20. Boxed me in quite nicely, don't you think?
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 05:58 PM
Aug 2013

Of course, there's a difference between suggestive evidence and clear evidence. Clear evidence would require residue testing, I believe, which I do hope that UN team will be doing. Until then, reserving judgment is the only smart choice. Anything else could lead people to think one is hysterical.

As for my assumptions, allow me to use "clear evidence" to explain them.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023524905#post85 <---bit more than just cordoning off things

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023524905#post170 <---this is what I called trying to manipulate using emotion

I think we should wait to hear from the UN inspection team--they were only granted access today. MADem Aug 2013 #1
Holy shit MFrohike Aug 2013 #3
Which post? MADem Aug 2013 #5
Relax MFrohike Aug 2013 #6
I have a little difficulty 'relaxing' when I see so many little kids lying dead in their shrouds. MADem Aug 2013 #8
That's a mighty high horse MFrohike Aug 2013 #9
There you go again--mocking a situation that just is not fucking funny. MADem Aug 2013 #10
Mocking the situation? MFrohike Aug 2013 #12
Actually, you started some shit about this being right out of 2003. There are some stark differences KittyWampus Aug 2013 #14
Ok MFrohike Aug 2013 #16
You have a vivid imagination/chip on your shoulder & I don't even recognize your username…. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #18
So? MFrohike Aug 2013 #22
What debate? There is no debate about the use of chemical weapons--it's a bad thing to do. MADem Aug 2013 #17
Boxed me in quite nicely, don't you think? MFrohike Aug 2013 #20
Way to take comments out of context. MADem Aug 2013 #21
Calm down MFrohike Aug 2013 #23
I am entirely calm. The answer to a problem--like the deployment of CW--is not "Ignore it." MADem Aug 2013 #24
It is emotional MFrohike Aug 2013 #25
I just can't get into this with you. TLDR, as the kids say. You're interested in fighting, I'm MADem Aug 2013 #26
You made my point MFrohike Aug 2013 #27
I fully agree with your responses malokvale77 Aug 2013 #33
What point? That your outrage and morality are situational? That you can "look away?" MADem Aug 2013 #36
No MFrohike Aug 2013 #38
There are many ways to get involved without doing more harm than good. MADem Aug 2013 #39
It's an end goal MFrohike Aug 2013 #55
YOUR WELL THOUGHT OUT & RATIONAL RESPONSES FILL ME WITH RAGE Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #49
Agreed. An emotional knee-jerk response HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #48
Well said! CJCRANE Aug 2013 #32
The Syrian Rebels have been killing civilians also. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #30
Helloooooo? Since when do two wrongs make a right? MADem Aug 2013 #35
So you want to add a third wrong? HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #40
That is not true. You aren't arguing from a place of experience. MADem Aug 2013 #41
These aren't large immobile weapons. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #44
Just get both sides to agree to a cease fire?!? How? Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #50
There were people here who would have supported war against Iraq, if UN approved it. David__77 Aug 2013 #13
I want those CW removed--that's my focus. nt MADem Aug 2013 #19
That will take US soldiers on the ground. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #42
No it will not. You are not arguing your case based on any understanding of how these weapons are MADem Aug 2013 #43
The two sides don't want peace. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #47
Rummy said Iraq would be a few weeks, max. And UN Peacekeepers keep the peace so there has to Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #51
Rummy wanted to put TROOPS in Iraq--that's not what I'm talking about. MADem Aug 2013 #54
Without UN approval, wouldn't that kinda be a war crime? leftstreet Aug 2013 #2
Why should repubs care about war crimes? Hayduke Bomgarte Aug 2013 #4
Are you saying the Democrats have denounced this? leftstreet Aug 2013 #15
True....rethugs are for it... HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #52
The American Sheep haven't experienced the "incubator cord" incident du jour libdem4life Aug 2013 #7
Of course there will be bi-partisan support... dtom67 Aug 2013 #11
"Swift action" against Syria, but no food stamp program because they're on vacation bhikkhu Aug 2013 #28
So if the rebels did it madville Aug 2013 #29
shades of the dick, cheney spanone Aug 2013 #31
Love your OP subject line. !!! kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #34
so, Representative Engel, you cool with putting your son or daughter's body on the line ? steve2470 Aug 2013 #37
Send the sons and daughters (grandsons and granddaughters) of HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #45
agreed ! nt steve2470 Aug 2013 #46
Earlier allegations of CWs were debunked. These may be also. GoneFishin Aug 2013 #53
video jakeXT Aug 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Members of Congress call ...»Reply #20