In the discussion thread: "WikiLeaks has problems with 'democratic processes': Dr Cannold" [View all]
Response to ProSense (Original post)
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 11:14 AM
struggle4progress (76,251 posts)
28. Why I resigned from the WikiLeaks party (Daniel Mathews)
I was a member of the WikiLeaks party national council and have been a friend of Julian Assange since university. Here is why I am resigning from my position
Wednesday 21 August 2013 23.19 EDT
... National council meetings have been held at least weekly for several months. Until last Friday, Julian had attended precisely one meeting. He is extremely busy, of course, and has many important things to do. Helping Edward Snowden is surely more important than attending a council meeting. But still, attending one out of the first 13 National council meetings of the party (all of which he could call in to) is a fairly low participation rate in one’s own party, for a man confined to an embassy equipped with a telephone ...
Although Assange had not attended the meeting, after receiving the council’s resolution by email he quickly wrote a long email entitled “NC micromanagement of preferences”, in which he expressed his displeasure with the council in making such requests, and proposed an alternative structure for preference decisions. Negotiations would be done by lead candidates, with no restraints on them, and Assange having a right of veto. He proposed giving the national council a role in rubber-stamping the results of this process.
Thus, one member of the national council was proposing to grant themselves a right of veto and to reduce it to a rubber stamp. Given the eagerness of some to pursue deals even with the far right, I and several others on the national council were keen to retain the national council’s role in these important decisions.
I told the council that the party could have been set up autocratically, but it was not set up that way. It was set up with a reasonably democratic structure, with a governing council with membership and representation from various sectors supportive of, and related to, WikiLeaks. If it could be overridden by the lead candidate when he disagreed, it would be a sham. This received the support of several others on the council, and it thus appeared that the council would not be reduced to a sham ...
Give me the courage to change what I can change, the patience to accept what I cannot change, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of people I had to kill because they pissed me off -- St Francis, Revisited
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
|East Coast Pirate||Aug 2013||#5|
|Warren Stupidity||Aug 2013||#13|
Why I resigned from the WikiLeaks party (Daniel Mathews)
|Dawson Leery||Aug 2013||#53|
Please login to view edit histories.