Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dogknob

(2,431 posts)
13. No, they're not.
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 07:04 AM
Aug 2013

Laura Ingraham has been subbing for Billo often of late (my neighbor watches FOX every day).

I think it's the right move for them and if I were Jolly Roger, I might have made it back when Hilary entered the ring back in the 2008 election season.

Rush and Hannity are disgusting and gross. Kelly is not. They've been grooming her for this job. She basically got her own show on election night after Rove's meltdown when she and a cameraman walked off the set and down to the Data Center to "get the facts." She got to "be a journalist" for a while and it looked great. They got the camera off of The Fuming Ham and onto the pretty lady. It works.

Doesn't seem like rocket science to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Righties put their parano...»Reply #13