Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
29. because the anti-choice agenda to outlaw contraception is supposed to be a secret
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:50 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:22 AM - Edit history (2)

they know it's a loser, but they also can't go "We don't want to overturn Griswold, we acknowledge that people have a right to use contraception" (in other words, they have a "license to do things in the sexual realm that make God mad" or whatever it was Sticky Ricky said) ... they can't do that because THE INSANE BELIEF that ONE OF THESE DAYS they'll be able to throw all the 'sluts' who use the pill in prison (while telling the rest to put an aspirin between their knees) has been the secret fantasy that has kept all these repressed fetus fetishists priapic for all these years, probably ever since 1974 when everyone else was getting laid and they were sitting at home with Pat Boone on the 8 track.

In case anyone doubts that this has been what it's been about from the get-go, remember that the HLA has been a central part of the GOP Plank for decades. Here's what the big 'pro life' orgs have to say on the HLA, contraception, etc:

http://www.all.org/article/index/id/MjM4NQ

Spin, Spin, Spin. However grudgingly they may acknowledge that "The American People are still apparently favorable to contraception" (cue the heavy siiiiigh ) it's pretty clear that the plan is to go after the bad pills once the abortion drs are out of the way:

It is true, of course, that the plague of abortion is attributable in large part to the mentality of unwanting babies that is characteristic of the contraceptive society that we have become.

It is clear that the intrauterine device and many birth control pills are abortifacients rather than contraceptives. The HLA would permit a state legislature to control such abortifacients...

Where a device or pill has no other use than to terminate life, the legislature, pursuant to the HLA, could prohibit its manufacture and sale.

(cough. handguns. cough.)

This is a matter of great importance, because the abortion of the near future is going to be by pill or other do-it-yourself means. If we concentrate only on surgical abortions at later stages of pregnancy, we risk sanctioning a wholesale slaughter of persons in the earliest stages of life. There is a tendency in some parts of the pro-life movement to seek a "quick fix" by conceding the legitimacy of early abortions. This would be a fatal mistake. The fact is that the lUD and most birth control pills do kill people. Their victims are very little people but it surely is within the power of any civilized society to do whatever can be done to prevent those killings.


http://prolifeaction.org/faq/stand.php#abc

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/11/01/358658/personhood-usa-confirms-that-mississippi-abortion-ban-would-outlaw-birth-control-pills/




anyway, if these Jesusbagger a-holes are so sure they're right, they should be ECSTATIC that their godly keep-your-legs-crossed-young-lady agenda is getting so much airtime. I mean, I thought the "values voter" was all-powerful, and all that noise about a pro-choice majority was just librul socialist godless agit-prop.



For the average Jane and Joe I would say that is correct Don madokie Feb 2012 #1
I know! I thought the crowd response was very odd. snappyturtle Feb 2012 #2
For the same reason they yelled out "Let them die!" lunatica Feb 2012 #3
It was one of them there liberal media "gotcha" questions, don't ya know ... winky winky. JoePhilly Feb 2012 #4
That's exactly it. They know contraception isn't a winner for them RZM Feb 2012 #17
I think the GOP candidates planned Newt's angry response ahead of time. JoePhilly Feb 2012 #21
This... Volaris Feb 2012 #30
Maybe the republican audience knew that democrats and independents were watching the debate on cable no_hypocrisy Feb 2012 #5
I think you are right. I could just hear them saying "NO NO NO! Don't ask that question!" CTyankee Feb 2012 #18
I doubt that much of their audience is capable of thinking that far ahead. Arkansas Granny Feb 2012 #19
It's a little late to catch that bull Tsiyu Feb 2012 #6
Schadenfreude peace frog Feb 2012 #7
Indeed! Tsiyu Feb 2012 #8
it's an ignorant audience. ig. no. rant. spanone Feb 2012 #9
when you stack the audience with ringers of teh stupid, what do you expect? Javaman Feb 2012 #10
Exactly. I was trying to recall a debate of our's PotatoChip Feb 2012 #15
Simple. Even Republicans use contraception on the few times that they have sex. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #11
Because bringing up the question at all... ljm2002 Feb 2012 #12
I have a feeling these people are not going to be thanking ol' Darrell Issa Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #13
I believe that they feel the question inappropriate for some reason pokerfan Feb 2012 #14
Because this is a non-issue for most Republicans abowsh Feb 2012 #16
Because they are malaise Feb 2012 #20
4 decades of AM hate radio and TV misinformation will rot many a brain. Initech Feb 2012 #22
It goes against their frame of "religious freedom" CANDO Feb 2012 #23
That was my take. Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #26
Maybe they're booing because they don't approve of contraception. Quantess Feb 2012 #24
Not odd at all. GoCubsGo Feb 2012 #25
"Stop embarrassing us by making us answer questions." lumberjack_jeff Feb 2012 #28
I thought the boos were strange too, seems like the kind of question they like Raine Feb 2012 #27
because the anti-choice agenda to outlaw contraception is supposed to be a secret Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #29
Because the partisan crowd felt uneasy Jack Sprat Feb 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did the crowd boo las...»Reply #29