Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
19. Democracy and the constitution are not necessarily the same thing - are they?
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 05:51 AM
Aug 2013

We can have our constitution within a capitalist republic system, which is essentially what we have. The veil of democracy, I have never really bought into it. It is clear that corporations and the rich run the show and have since the early days of the republic. So restoring is not really the question since imo, current conditions have been status quo since day 1.

Now as far as the domestic spying issues, I agree, these are egregious infringements on the constitution. How to stop it? Hmm. How do we even know what the extent of the spying is and how do we determine if it has been stopped? Do you think the government agencies are even going to come clean with congress? Much less the American public?

They are spooks. Shadows. Working in the dark and never to be revealed. I am not sure how we get a handle on them. I truly believe that congress cannot even reign them in at this point. De-funding them through congress will have no affect - there will always be super rich corpo interests to provide the money.

In any event, the constitution in rapidly becoming a relic with no modern relevance - not that I agree that it should be so, or think it is a good thing in any way. The constitution is being ignored, trampled and "interpreted" in ways that are so far fetched as to be laughable. There is no commitment to it anymore. Contemporary politicians care more about finding ways to circumvent the constitution with legal loophole jumping than adhering to it's core principles.

How do restore it? Better to ask how do regain control from the corporate megaliths that run our country for their own benefit.

This sounds too much like fundie conservative talk. Oakenshield Aug 2013 #1
Yeah, shame that it's gone this far, that my extreme left views could be viewed that way by some. silvershadow Aug 2013 #2
Giving up your healthcare won't restore constitutional law. pnwmom Aug 2013 #3
Oh, I agree with you that rolling it back won't restore constitutional law, and I agree with moving silvershadow Aug 2013 #4
False dichotomy. False dichotomy. False dichotomy. False dichotomy. False dichotomy. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #5
No. No. No. No. No. No dichotomy whatsoever. Just my opinion. I would prefer the rule of law so silvershadow Aug 2013 #8
That's called a dichotomy. And, in the real world, it is also false. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #15
It's a false dichotomy since it's NOT either/or. It's a false choice & the options are independent. Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2013 #25
If I were to hazard a guess ......... dothemath Aug 2013 #34
Of course it is a false dichotomy. That is the point of the OP. djean111 Aug 2013 #28
You can't be at all subtle on DU, there's always someone who misses it Fumesucker Aug 2013 #44
Evidently. There was such a loud Whoosh!!!!!!! overhead I thought there was a rogue shuttle landing djean111 Aug 2013 #47
not even sure what that means, it's something i hear the wingnuts say all the time JI7 Aug 2013 #6
Except that I'm not complaining about socialism. Bernie Sanders is one of my heroes. I simply and silvershadow Aug 2013 #7
"Restore the constitution" means allow everyone to have rocket launchers and tanks. nt MADem Aug 2013 #13
I can't decide TexasTowelie Aug 2013 #9
It's not about ACA. I love ACA for what it is, and hope we can do even more. I'm just saying silvershadow Aug 2013 #10
I would simply demand both. One does not need to exclude the other. geckosfeet Aug 2013 #11
True. What though does it take to figure out how to restore our democracy? I mean, really? nt silvershadow Aug 2013 #12
An electorate that wasn't filled so largely with buffoons. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #17
Democracy and the constitution are not necessarily the same thing - are they? geckosfeet Aug 2013 #19
REC PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #48
Why do you frame it in terms of a choice? Demit Aug 2013 #14
Think of it as an evaluation of the Obama presidency - on the whole, it's not that great. reformist2 Aug 2013 #24
One can evaluate the Obama presidency in more coherent terms. Demit Aug 2013 #40
I feel completely the opposite Californeeway Aug 2013 #16
People naturally resist a lot of things that they should not. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #18
there are definitely circumstances in which you would be correct Californeeway Aug 2013 #20
Welcome to DU Fumesucker Aug 2013 #31
AS a lifelong democratic-socialist I would say that I would rather live in a non-authoritarian Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #21
I get what you're saying, and agree with your priorities. reformist2 Aug 2013 #22
you already have the 'right' to not have healthcare and die where you fall Sunlei Aug 2013 #23
Too bad you look at people getting Obamacare on Oct 1 as rah rah.. Cha Aug 2013 #26
My impression of the OP is that we are constantly given a weird Sophie's Choice if we complain about djean111 Aug 2013 #27
This really does sound like a ridiculous choice Paul Ryan would offer. Squinch Aug 2013 #29
another moronic post ....... dothemath Aug 2013 #30
Welcome to DU Fumesucker Aug 2013 #32
LOL! the poster has been a member longer than you, Mr Welcome Wagon. Demit Aug 2013 #42
And wise indeed have they become Fumesucker Aug 2013 #43
Except the people who would be free to reject health care watoos Aug 2013 #33
Oh I wouldn't worry too much about the health *care* part Fumesucker Aug 2013 #35
Yeah, you can give up medicaid, social security, and medicare tooi Progressive dog Aug 2013 #36
When you're healthy, you can fight better for what you believe in struggle4progress Aug 2013 #37
Ah, yes, the smell of Skidmore Aug 2013 #38
keep the healthcare, dump the guns except for militias rurallib Aug 2013 #39
It's not either or malaise Aug 2013 #41
WTF? 99Forever Aug 2013 #45
This Democrat will continue praising Obamacare and the 30 million poor who can finally afford HC... tridim Aug 2013 #46
healthcare? when'd we get healthcare? MisterP Aug 2013 #49
Well, it's the law of the land, so we will get it, at some point (in theory, anyway). There are silvershadow Aug 2013 #50
the ACA does not guarantee healthcare MisterP Aug 2013 #51
Indeed it does not. silvershadow Aug 2013 #52
You've always had it. Go to Health Resources Services Administration. Link. DevonRex Aug 2013 #53
health care is a fundamental inalienable right. Period. bowens43 Aug 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'd rather restore consti...»Reply #19