Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
27. All right, I'll try.
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 03:28 AM
Aug 2013

First, by waiting a couple of weeks, the Western Powers would have wound up giving Hokkaido to Stalin and the Soviet Union. They had advanced--if highly shoe-string--plans to invade the northernmost of the main Japanese islands on or about August 21, 1945.

The preparatory step was the Soviet invasion of the Kurile Islands, which began on August 18 and was largely complete within four days. All Japanese residents were expelled by 1946, and the islands, now without the silent "e," remain Russian.

http://istoria.pl/history388.html

That almost certainly would have led to larger Soviet involvement in, for example, the Korean War.

Second, by waiting a couple of weeks and allowing the Soviets a toe-hold on mainland Japan when the Americans did not have one, American plans to invade the southernmost of the main islands, Kyushu, might have been moved up from its planned November 1 date.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6231948&mesg_id=6232074

Unfortunately for the Americans, the Japanese had correctly anticipated exactly where the Marines were going to land, had fortified those places, and had at least as many troops on hand to defend as there were Marines to invade. Top brass were inclined to doubt the usually ridiculous claims of enemy strength provided by MacArthur's staff--but this time they had got their call right.

Recall that the bloodbath of Iwo Jima was successfully conducted with a greater than three to one troop advantage in favor of the Americans, taking weeks and thousands of lives to clear out an island eight square miles in area. Then consider that the Japanese were planning to conscript all men and women on Kyushu and use them in the defense--the women were going to be charging machine guns with bamboo spears.

Moving up the date of Operation Olympic would have made it even less likely that the details of the plan could be changed. But the Americans had a super-awesome contingency plan, which would be to use the six or seven atomic bombs we expected to have by then as tactical nuclear weapons, nuke the beaches and inland defenses, and then land the Marines and march them through the radiation zones. The Americans were also seriously considering the use of poison gas to deal with Japanese cave defense tactics, because what could possibly go wrong with that? It's not like the Japanese were planning to hide their kids in the caves--oh, wait, yeah they were.

Yes, all one million of the invading soldiers and Marines, most of them fresh out of high school, would have died within a decade or two from complications of radiation exposure, if they weren't killed by suicidal and irradiated Japanese civilians, and untold millions of Japanese soldiers and civilians would have died as well, and the Soviets would have systematically murdered and worked to death another million Hokkaidans, and then Honshu would also have to be invaded, probably also preceded by atomic bombs and another million American troops because the previous million would be too sick to participate in that invasion....

But the innocent people Hiroshima and Nagasaki might have lived up to another year, and one or two surely would have avoided being consumed in the far larger and bloodier conflicts that loomed. Those people might have been saved--at the cost of twenty times as many other people.

The horse.... Socal31 Aug 2013 #1
heaven forfend that we should discuss possible alternatives in such a horrific event. niyad Aug 2013 #3
Rape of Nanking. Heaven forbid that we should discuss possible alternatives in Nanjing to Seoul Aug 2013 #14
Possiable alternatives? Lancero Aug 2013 #28
best post of the annual Niceguy1 Aug 2013 #29
Some of us believe the examination of historical events is worthwhile. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #30
is it so hard to understand that the possible alternatives discussion reference should have happened niyad Aug 2013 #31
Apparently, to many, it is. ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #41
Ah, Bullshit. cliffordu Aug 2013 #50
I diagree that neither target was a military target NutmegYankee Aug 2013 #55
Yes we did telclaven Aug 2013 #56
I have asked why the hypothetical "million casualties" invasion was necessary Bonobo Aug 2013 #2
The world had gone through WWI and now less than thirty years later was engulfed in another war Fumesucker Aug 2013 #9
OK, let's put ourselves in their shoes. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #18
WWII was a catclysmic national effort for the USA as well as other nations Fumesucker Aug 2013 #24
How about dropping the bomb to save innocent lives? hack89 Aug 2013 #48
Which innocent lives would have been lost? Jim Lane Aug 2013 #59
There were deaths ongoing up to the day Allied occupation troops arrived hack89 Aug 2013 #63
Read a goddamned book. cliffordu Aug 2013 #51
I've read lots of books. Bonobo Aug 2013 #57
Coming from you, that's hot praise. cliffordu Aug 2013 #58
It was obviously a message to the Soviets. joshcryer Aug 2013 #4
The timing doesn't work out for your argument. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #12
OK, under that scenario, I wholly agree. joshcryer Aug 2013 #15
Yes, I was talking about only a few weeks. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #19
Bucky claims Stalin was advancing his troops. joshcryer Aug 2013 #22
How was Russia going to overrun Japan? Swim? GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #67
There's a fabulous book of essays about this LearnedHand Aug 2013 #5
Personally I suspect Truman was actually afraid that Japan would surrender jimlup Aug 2013 #6
Poppycock. Bucky Aug 2013 #10
I agree with this post. hunter Aug 2013 #7
A few more incorrect statements from this thread Bucky Aug 2013 #11
Moral arguments are silly when discussing atrocities like this. hunter Aug 2013 #13
The list grows Bucky Aug 2013 #20
The war machine for the Japanese invasion was rolling yes... hunter Aug 2013 #32
"two bombs, bang bang, and the good guys win" Bucky Aug 2013 #39
"US intel showed Japan had more defenders ready on Kyushu" - ummm ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #42
good question. Bucky Aug 2013 #43
"essentially a weapon of terror" - yep - it sure was. ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #45
Why the focus on Truman's decision. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #62
Since Hiroshima was the MHQ for the second army nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #54
The targeting documents are dry reading, like most military documents, but are available ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #60
I actually think that using those two nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #44
Not invaded? You don't know your history. Read up on Operaton Olympic. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #46
November 1st... hunter Aug 2013 #52
A list of incorrect statements in this thread so far Bucky Aug 2013 #8
Nice contradiction. What gives? joshcryer Aug 2013 #17
Those are two very different things in the real world Bucky Aug 2013 #21
How long do you think the Soviets had until they got a surrender? joshcryer Aug 2013 #23
I appreciate that you're not echoing the tired "save American lives" meme, but.... Jim Lane Aug 2013 #25
Let's be clear, i.e. an Asian "iron curtain" zipplewrath Aug 2013 #35
Thanks for responding. I've based my arguments on primary sources, hence contradictions. Bucky Aug 2013 #36
Little to NO sympathy for the use of the A-bomb. Hulk Aug 2013 #16
You're begging the question. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #26
All right, I'll try. sofa king Aug 2013 #27
We marched the marines across atomic bomb wastelands later... in Nevada. hunter Aug 2013 #33
Definitely not a consideration. sofa king Aug 2013 #49
I have often wondered what the ramifications of waiting for a Soviet invasion were Lee-Lee Aug 2013 #34
Well, why not wait a few weeks more than a few? brooklynite Aug 2013 #37
Sure, wait the additional time if you know that yet another powerful nation will declare war. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #38
Not even hindsight is 20/20 in this case. Bake Aug 2013 #47
Fact: you cant un-explode an A-bomb 68 year later markiv Aug 2013 #53
They had a chance to surrender and they rejected it -- The Potsdam Declaration DCBob Aug 2013 #64
The decision to drop the bomb melm00se Aug 2013 #65
Regardless - the indiscriminate slaughter and maiming of tens of thousands with one bomb is amoral ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An overlooked A-bomb issu...»Reply #27