Some background on the latest hero, blogger Michele Catalano,

[pnwmom]

23. It is not at all clear what the employer found on the computer

that led the employer to report him to the police.

The day before she said it was only for the items mentioned. But today she's saying she has new information about something the employer found on his work computer -- but she's not sharing what this was.

So what we know now -- according to her -- is that the searches involved "things" her husband "looked up at his old job." That the piece she wrote the day before was "misleading." And that "there were other circumstances involved" that she was unaware of when she wrote the original post.

Also, she wasn't there when the police came, so her first report was second-hand. Maybe the police told the husband more than he initially acknowledged to her -- there's no way to know. But we do know she wasn't there.

https://medium.com/something-like-falling/2e7d13e54724


We found out through the Suffolk Police Department that the searches involved also things my husband looked up at his old job. We were not made aware of this at the time of questioning and were led to believe it was solely from searches from within our house.

I did not lie or make it up. I wrote the piece with the information that was given. What was withheld from us obviously could not be a part of a story I wrote based on what happened yesterday.

The piece I wrote was the story as we knew it with the information we were told. None of it was fabricated. If you know me, you know I would never do that.

If it was misleading, just know that my intention was the truth. And that was what I knew as the truth until about ten minutes ago. That there were other circumstances involved was something we all were unaware of.