Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
9. It's about proximity and also what the waves pass through.
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 09:29 PM
Feb 2012

Most of the time, the trans-vaginal is closer.

But there also isn't a wide variety of tissue with differing density between the vagina and the uterus. There is between the "belly" and the uterus...which is one of the reasons pre-natal "belly" ultrasounds are usually done with a full bladder.

What I'm saying is the 'belly' ultrasounds would produce an indistinct smudge at that gestation. While transvaginal lets you actually see the fetus.

And yes, I'm male. Doesn't mean I'm clueless. Aside from what people learn in biology if they pay attention, my wife had to have a transvaginal ultrasound early in her pregnancy when they couldn't resolve the fetus through her belly. The smudge on the screen that may-or-may-not be a baby on the 'belly' ultrasound became quite distinct transvaginally.

i noticed that too. an ultrasound sounds somewhat benign. spanone Feb 2012 #1
why "trans"? Enrique Feb 2012 #2
Trans: Beyond. Vaginal: the Vagina. TalkingDog Feb 2012 #3
No, in this case "trans" means "through" jeff47 Feb 2012 #5
I agree. Through is the better choice TalkingDog Feb 2012 #21
Having had one of these BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #4
The benefit of the transvaginal ultrasound is the probe is much, much closer jeff47 Feb 2012 #6
??? BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #7
It's about proximity and also what the waves pass through. jeff47 Feb 2012 #9
What if the uterus is full of fibroids? BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #11
So...you're going to argue that because rare conditions exist jeff47 Feb 2012 #13
What I'm describing isn't rare BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #16
Endometriosis: 5-10% of women. jeff47 Feb 2012 #32
Question: Were You Forced To Have This Procedure ??? - Was Your Doctor Forced To Perform It ??? WillyT Feb 2012 #10
Oh I'm in agreement with you BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #12
Thank You For That !!! WillyT Feb 2012 #14
No problem! BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #19
Why does a woman is seeking an abortion required to have something crammed up inside of her me b zola Feb 2012 #15
Well if you're an anti-abortion nut, it's because that's the only way to see it jeff47 Feb 2012 #31
call it "state sanctioned rape" handmade34 Feb 2012 #8
Yep... That's What EVERYBODY Should Be Calling It... WillyT Feb 2012 #18
I call it state sponsored terrorism Major Nikon Feb 2012 #28
STATE RAPE - ANY law that restricts or denies a woman's right to ALL reproductive health services amb123 Feb 2012 #29
ed shultz called it trans-vaginal spanone Feb 2012 #17
It's prob because they're two elderly gentlemen who can't dmr Feb 2012 #20
You got it. BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #22
On The Contrary... These Are The Most Valuable Stories Of All... WillyT Feb 2012 #23
Men of a certain age.... baldguy Feb 2012 #24
Buncha prudes. They think "vagina" is profane. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #25
If you want to discuss Republican social policy, you have to talk about body parts. DirkGently Feb 2012 #26
K&R Skittles Feb 2012 #27
It is hard for me to peruse this visual because Mira Feb 2012 #30
MSNBC is worthlessly corrupted propaganda, a disgrace to all humanity just1voice Feb 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've Noticed This Twice T...»Reply #9