Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"The day the right lost the economic argument...President Obama's speech clinched the case..." [View all]
The day the right lost the economic argument
President Obama's speech clinched the case against Norquist-style austerity and won over the likes of USA Today
By Michael Lind
If you need any further evidence of the stark ideological divide that separates progressives from conservatives, you can find it by contrasting President Barack Obamas speech on the economy with the response of the House Republicans...the president provided a capsule summary of the mainstream progressive narrative about the U.S. economy from 1945 to 2009:
Thats an excellent statement of the progressive theory of the case. What collapsed in 2008 was not merely the lesser stock and real estate bubble of the 2000s, but the larger Bubble Economy which had been artificially juiced up since the 1980s.
If you accept this thesis, as most progressives do, there can be no going to back to pre-2008 normality because from Reagan to George W. Bush the normal was abnormal and sustained only by the Keynesian stimulus provided by Reagans and George W. Bushs military build-ups and the stock market and real estate bubbles fueled by tax cuts for the rich. (Conservatives oppose Keynesian stimulus in the form of productive infrastructure investment, but support Keynesian stimulus if it benefits rentiers, defense contractors, real estate speculators and money managers).
- more -
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/25/the_day_the_right_lost_the_economic_argument/
President Obama's speech clinched the case against Norquist-style austerity and won over the likes of USA Today
By Michael Lind
If you need any further evidence of the stark ideological divide that separates progressives from conservatives, you can find it by contrasting President Barack Obamas speech on the economy with the response of the House Republicans...the president provided a capsule summary of the mainstream progressive narrative about the U.S. economy from 1945 to 2009:
In the period after World War II, a growing middle class was the engine of our prosperity. Whether you owned a company, swept its floors, or worked anywhere in between, this country offered you a basic bargain a sense that your hard work would be rewarded with fair wages and benefits, the chance to buy a home, to save for retirement, and, above all, to hand down a better life for your kids.
But over time, that engine began to stall. That bargain began to fray. Technology made some jobs obsolete. Global competition sent others overseas. It became harder for unions to fight for the middle class. Washington doled out bigger tax cuts to the rich and smaller minimum wage increases for the working poor. The link between higher productivity and peoples wages and salaries was severed the income of the top 1% nearly quadrupled from 1979 to 2007, while the typical familys barely budged.
Towards the end of those three decades, a housing bubble, credit cards, and a churning financial sector kept the economy artificially juiced up.
Thats an excellent statement of the progressive theory of the case. What collapsed in 2008 was not merely the lesser stock and real estate bubble of the 2000s, but the larger Bubble Economy which had been artificially juiced up since the 1980s.
If you accept this thesis, as most progressives do, there can be no going to back to pre-2008 normality because from Reagan to George W. Bush the normal was abnormal and sustained only by the Keynesian stimulus provided by Reagans and George W. Bushs military build-ups and the stock market and real estate bubbles fueled by tax cuts for the rich. (Conservatives oppose Keynesian stimulus in the form of productive infrastructure investment, but support Keynesian stimulus if it benefits rentiers, defense contractors, real estate speculators and money managers).
- more -
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/25/the_day_the_right_lost_the_economic_argument/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
27 replies, 6255 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (61)
ReplyReply to this post
27 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The day the right lost the economic argument...President Obama's speech clinched the case..." [View all]
ProSense
Jul 2013
OP
Yet nothing will sway the GOP from their pledge to Grover and their obstruction
liberal N proud
Jul 2013
#2
unfortunately the country is blanketed with RW radio's take, like on all other issues/events
certainot
Jul 2013
#5
Obama is leading the charge. Either help or get out of the way. K&R. nt
AllINeedIsCoffee
Jul 2013
#18