Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whopis01

(3,511 posts)
133. That logic doesn't really work
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jul 2013

There is irony in vehemently expressing ones indifference towards a topic.

If one was truly indifferent then they would likely not be shouting out their opinions on it. One who is outraged on the other hand would be expected to do so.

With that said - I don't the OP falls into that category. Sounds like he is indifferent to the royal birth but is outraged (or at least annoyed) that it distracts from other things the media could be covering.

That makes two of us... n/t PasadenaTrudy Jul 2013 #1
And that makes three of us. RebelOne Jul 2013 #86
then turn the tv off warrior1 Jul 2013 #2
We can't have opinions? Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #72
not sure who wouldn't care about a baby being born PatrynXX Jul 2013 #92
"Probably don't like kids anyway" ... Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #121
did I say you couldn't have an opinion? warrior1 Jul 2013 #116
Nope, you didn't say it. Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #120
whatever warrior1 Jul 2013 #124
You cared enough to post this. TheManInTheMac Jul 2013 #3
LOL! Exactly. Zoeisright Jul 2013 #97
Cared enough to say it stupid. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #115
That makes 3 of us.. HipChick Jul 2013 #4
It's basically Disney-princess fantasy for adults. reformist2 Jul 2013 #5
The more grim real life becomes, the more the desire to retreat to fantasy.... Junkdrawer Jul 2013 #8
Hence the resurgence of religion. nt awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #98
Atheism is the fastest growing religion. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #118
You almost drew me offsides... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #126
Especially because SANE American adults prefer the REAL Disney World, Disney cruises, Disney WinkyDink Jul 2013 #15
Ugh, I hate all that Disney theme park stuff. Awful, awful, awful. reformist2 Jul 2013 #29
Some people sound like they prefer Self Flagellation Park ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2013 #68
I actually love a lot of silly entertainment. But not $100 a pop for an overcommercialized theme par reformist2 Jul 2013 #89
Heh. So many DUers vehemently expressing their indifference. Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #6
That's a bit facile, don't you think? Orrex Jul 2013 #54
May I just say redwitch Jul 2013 #129
That logic doesn't really work whopis01 Jul 2013 #133
There's not caring, and then there's not caring. Orrex Jul 2013 #140
Indeed BuddhaGirl Jul 2013 #110
and yet you posted. for the record, it is catherine, duchess of cambridge. niyad Jul 2013 #7
Exactly, who gives a shit..!! busterbrown Jul 2013 #9
Proud of ignorance! Good on ya! WinkyDink Jul 2013 #16
I am also very ignorant on the subject of guns and expensive cars.. busterbrown Jul 2013 #18
It's not like its the freakin King (or Queen) of England being born NightWatcher Jul 2013 #10
what royal baby. speaking of babies okieinpain Jul 2013 #11
It wasn't a bad film cabot Jul 2013 #42
lol, i wouldn't know the difference between okieinpain Jul 2013 #75
I think they should make a movie about Annabelle the doll cabot Jul 2013 #81
lol. those girls were stupid as hell. you give a spirit okieinpain Jul 2013 #165
Eh, why is it worth Tien1985 Jul 2013 #12
One royal birth won't exactly have a major impact on the world population. You really need to look WinkyDink Jul 2013 #17
I hear you Tien1985 Jul 2013 #26
Best you attack the latest round of Prime Ministers, not the Queen. BTW: You need a fact-checkerrr. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #13
I bet your house is filled with Royalty Memorabilia... Very cool... busterbrown Jul 2013 #23
MSNBC = Info-tainment. Belongs with E! True Hollywood Story and the like. limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #14
Can I use this thread to list all the things I don't give a shit about... Bay Boy Jul 2013 #19
Yes! Iggo Jul 2013 #21
Did you reply like that on purpose? Bay Boy Jul 2013 #127
I did! Iggo Jul 2013 #128
You're a bad person! Bay Boy Jul 2013 #130
Only if you start with yourself MattBaggins Jul 2013 #138
Maybe send that sentiment to msnbc? Dreamer Tatum Jul 2013 #20
How dare you! People gave their lives so you could care about the Royal Family! NuclearDem Jul 2013 #22
I think you must give a shit Progressive dog Jul 2013 #24
I hate all royal crap BainsBane Jul 2013 #25
So you started a thread about it? MineralMan Jul 2013 #27
That Ribbon is an Air Force Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon warrant46 Jul 2013 #30
Why, so it is! MineralMan Jul 2013 #33
Thank you for your service !!! warrant46 Jul 2013 #39
You too. I was surprised to go to range training and MineralMan Jul 2013 #50
A thread concerning media distractions. busterbrown Jul 2013 #31
Being distracted by such things is a personal choice... MineralMan Jul 2013 #36
Your point? Stay off point? busterbrown Jul 2013 #41
Uh, that''s all in the UK. MineralMan Jul 2013 #43
The show in the Uk is funded entirely with people’s taxes.. busterbrown Jul 2013 #52
:shrug: MineralMan Jul 2013 #53
What is your point? busterbrown Jul 2013 #151
I wonder how much tourism is generated because of those things? karynnj Jul 2013 #57
TONS. Buckingham Palace Inc. is HUGE business for the Brits. HUGE tourist attractions. calimary Jul 2013 #123
We are also well beyond a thousand years old MattBaggins Jul 2013 #139
thank you for pointing out the change in the succession law--kind of a big thing for those of niyad Jul 2013 #141
He did that to mess with your brain...put one of these on Rex Jul 2013 #160
Here here DainBramaged Jul 2013 #28
There, There. MineralMan Jul 2013 #108
So True grilled onions Jul 2013 #32
I couldn’t give a shit Flashmann Jul 2013 #34
You gave enough of a shit HappyMe Jul 2013 #35
It’s a thread concerning distraction... busterbrown Jul 2013 #37
Oh good grief. HappyMe Jul 2013 #45
And you gleefully jumped on the distraction bandwagon. City Lights Jul 2013 #60
Yeah, sick to death of "The Royal Family" AndyA Jul 2013 #38
However, the royal baby will be giving quite a lot of shit in the coming weeks, kentauros Jul 2013 #40
Are they taking bets as to which hole the baby comes out of? L0oniX Jul 2013 #49
So don't watch; nobody's forcing you to. badtoworse Jul 2013 #44
There are no such people as "Royals" anymore then we have Botany Jul 2013 #46
It's worshipper candy for the stupid. L0oniX Jul 2013 #47
Good for you. Now why don't you start a thread about Zimmerman or Snowden or Boehner- Rowdyboy Jul 2013 #48
I’d rather discuss the repeal of Obamacare or perhaps how Texas has now passed a bill which almost busterbrown Jul 2013 #149
I don't consider myself a self-appointer arbitor of what is an appropriate discussion subject and Rowdyboy Jul 2013 #155
Who the hell was I bitching about? busterbrown Jul 2013 #161
So MSNBC exists just to cover things that entertain you or that you think important? karynnj Jul 2013 #51
Filing in "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" Folder....... yellowcanine Jul 2013 #55
I think it's nice to erect monuments to facilitate worship of the upper class Orrex Jul 2013 #56
Agreed. SoapBox Jul 2013 #58
Such a GOOD reason to start a thread on the subject! elleng Jul 2013 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author datasuspect Jul 2013 #61
You think its important enough to post... iandhr Jul 2013 #62
Cut off the "Royal Family"s welfare!! lastlib Jul 2013 #63
Me too. xtraxritical Jul 2013 #64
We fought a Revolution to rid ourselves of that parasitic bunch called "royals" MNBrewer Jul 2013 #65
And we did get rid of them. But if the British people want to get rid of them that's for them to totodeinhere Jul 2013 #67
Hence why I don't pay any attention except for reading about it on here. MNBrewer Jul 2013 #74
The baby will be third in line to the throne and most likely a future monarch as we know. totodeinhere Jul 2013 #66
+1 N/T GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #69
I'm surprised people aren't whining that this belongs in the Lounge. nt LaydeeBug Jul 2013 #70
Me neither ... Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #71
Kathryn is Duchess of Cambridge actually NoPasaran Jul 2013 #73
and it is spelled catherine niyad Jul 2013 #143
10-4 heaven05 Jul 2013 #76
Totally agree. somethingshiny Jul 2013 #77
I'm pretty sure that was... Tribalceltic Jul 2013 #95
So, to reduce the amount of attention paid to this topic demwing Jul 2013 #78
lol - my thought exactly 840high Jul 2013 #85
As a Scot .. I concur Lenomsky Jul 2013 #79
I wouldn't say 'I don't care' Wait Wut Jul 2013 #80
baby kardonb Jul 2013 #82
I can't argue with that, at least. n/t AverageJoe90 Jul 2013 #96
...buuut just enough to rant about it on the internets.... truebrit71 Jul 2013 #83
It seems not caring Aerows Jul 2013 #93
Like jumping into a pond... Wait Wut Jul 2013 #99
U couldn't give a shit? Why not? Constipated? TheDebbieDee Jul 2013 #84
So this has turned into a clever writing audition? busterbrown Jul 2013 #150
Wow allinthegame Jul 2013 #87
same with the Royal Family of Belgium ZRT2209 Jul 2013 #88
ABOLISH MONARCHY WORLDWIDE. N/t alp227 Jul 2013 #90
+10000000000000 Initech Jul 2013 #111
But you made a thread about it? Aerows Jul 2013 #91
hey whats with the Dodgers this year ? olddots Jul 2013 #94
good for you LittleGirl Jul 2013 #100
What does constipation have to do with it? nt pintobean Jul 2013 #101
I have a problem trashing anyone without proper cause Tribalceltic Jul 2013 #102
I don't care so much that I didn't even start a thread about it. nt dorkulon Jul 2013 #103
Well the OP refuses to read that thread demwing Jul 2013 #125
I agree ctsnowman Jul 2013 #104
Despite what the media is reporting, most Brits don't give a shit either. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #105
I didn't know just being born was this big of a deal. BlueStater Jul 2013 #106
Essentially, you just gave it 'more coverage'. AtheistCrusader Jul 2013 #107
It beats listening to the zimmerman crap OVER AND OVER AND OVER n/t onecent Jul 2013 #109
Or the endless Snowden conspiracy theories. Initech Jul 2013 #114
Not it is not! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #119
You got that right. HappyMe Jul 2013 #132
Conversation with my sister about an hour ago TlalocW Jul 2013 #112
This baby will be the first one not inbred. Dawson Leery Jul 2013 #113
I should begin a thread about how careless I am in regards to automobiles LanternWaste Jul 2013 #117
I have no interest. LWolf Jul 2013 #122
My wife is happy to have another oh so very distant cousin indepat Jul 2013 #131
The next time you see your doctor, request a prescription for an irony supplement. 11 Bravo Jul 2013 #134
Damn it, you're making me hide another thread. Coyotl Jul 2013 #135
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #136
It is their tradition. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #137
Geez with everything going to hell in a handbasket a breather with just Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2013 #142
completely agree niyad Jul 2013 #146
Of course the struggle continues, doesn't it? But taking time Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2013 #166
despite what some people think, we ARE allowed that. as a matter of fact, it is absolutely niyad Jul 2013 #167
Beautiful moon and music. I can't see the moon where Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2013 #168
seems so simple, doesn't it? niyad Jul 2013 #169
I don't care much but am thinking of how much my English mum would have loved this Skittles Jul 2013 #144
same here quinnox Jul 2013 #145
you are absolutely right gabeana Jul 2013 #147
I'm offended by Americans embracing "royalty" TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #148
Apparently many will disagree with you. busterbrown Jul 2013 #152
Piss on a baby? Dreamer Tatum Jul 2013 #153
Thank God you took the time to announce it... Pelican Jul 2013 #154
good for you. I don't give a shit that you don't give a shit. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #156
You gave a shit enough to create a thread. donheld Jul 2013 #157
Good Point!!! busterbrown Jul 2013 #163
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #158
How dare you scoff at the royal poop! Rex Jul 2013 #159
I think it is MFM008 Jul 2013 #162
I didn’t realize that... I take it all back... busterbrown Jul 2013 #164
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Royal Baby? I couldn’...»Reply #133