Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
God, I love that woman NV Whino Jul 2013 #1
AMEN! She has huge courage and excellent values. She's looking out for the public like AikidoSoul Jul 2013 #65
First, they de-regulated the S&Ls... Octafish Jul 2013 #2
What those in Washington don't realize is going along with someone like Warren is all that stands yurbud Jul 2013 #32
I think they have an idea MsLeopard Jul 2013 #57
the difference between now and the past is the internet yurbud Jul 2013 #66
The S&Ls didn't only collapse because of crooks jmowreader Jul 2013 #37
Passive losses, however, can be deducted against passive gain... LooseWilly Jul 2013 #40
Now you can, yes jmowreader Jul 2013 #56
so hillary can sign GLB II im sure.... nt galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #3
Sign on to support Elizabeth .... Scuba Jul 2013 #4
K & R SunSeeker Jul 2013 #5
k&r thanks for posting. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #6
This is a necessity. We need to make this a big election issue in 2014. It will favor Democrats JDPriestly Jul 2013 #7
K&R forestpath Jul 2013 #8
Finally something I can be proud of. Cantwell is my senator. Thank you Warren, Cantwell, and King. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #9
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2013 #10
Excellent Berlum Jul 2013 #11
Great bill too bad it has no chance at becoming law. craigmatic Jul 2013 #12
You're absolutely right..Even if it passes in the Senate, it's DOA in the House. red dog 1 Jul 2013 #72
YES! She can't run for President soon enough! n/t Triana Jul 2013 #13
I agree! liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #16
YEAH! Squinch Jul 2013 #14
I wrote that FDR was smiling in Heaven when Warren was elected MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #15
Senators Warren, McCain, Cantwell, and King Introduce 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act ProSense Jul 2013 #17
Also, Senator Warren has a diary up a Daily Kos: ProSense Jul 2013 #21
And so they don't exist? zipplewrath Jul 2013 #22
K and R ReRe Jul 2013 #18
Finally! Now then, regarding the unconstitutional debacle of 1913. BornLooser Jul 2013 #19
While I agree with you on the Fed, there is one big problem. roamer65 Jul 2013 #33
Good point. I believe it has to start by. BornLooser Jul 2013 #48
Five and a half years after Bush, a DEMOCRATIC Senator finally introduces such a bill. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #20
Good! moondust Jul 2013 #23
Senator Warren is taking on the beast felix_numinous Jul 2013 #24
And where are the so-called conservatives who want to return to the past? lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #25
Key words being "so-called". BornLooser Jul 2013 #50
Sen. Warren is talented in lighting HUGE fires Hydra Jul 2013 #26
I'm so much more for Warren than Hilary stuffmatters Jul 2013 #27
No more Clintons! Go Elizabeth! xtraxritical Jul 2013 #35
When Glass-Steagall was repealed AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #38
Does it really work that way? mattclearing Jul 2013 #44
Of course he could have vetoed it and made them override his video. PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #45
Thanks for this. mattclearing Jul 2013 #47
And Hilary voted for the Iraq invasion, as well. And then made a snarky speech against it on the ste lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #53
Yes, and she said why AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #62
Hilary knew more than shrub did, because her husband could inform her. lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #63
Bill Clinton is not able to read minds AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #71
For 8 years the Neocons were looking for any excuse to invade Iraq stuffmatters Jul 2013 #74
Bingo. lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #79
He knew because the neocons wrote him a letter in 97 asking to invade iraq. lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #80
If it passes by a veto proof majority he is obligated to sign it. AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #60
No, he isn't. Once the veto is overridden it becomes law without his signature. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #68
Not true. mattclearing Jul 2013 #75
Bullshit. progressoid Jul 2013 #58
Glass Steagall passed by a VETO PROOF MAJORITY`` AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #61
He SUPPORTED it sparky. A veto wasn't even an issue. progressoid Jul 2013 #64
Again, this is not true. mattclearing Jul 2013 #77
Even if 100% voted for it, Clinton still could have vetoed. merrily Jul 2013 #82
Clinton told Congress he wanted the repeal on his desk for his signature ASAP. merrily Jul 2013 #81
FYI, there was no alleged veto proof majority, anyway. merrily Jul 2013 #83
This message was self-deleted by its author avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #67
Thank You For Sharing - I Wish More Senators Represented Americans As Well cantbeserious Jul 2013 #28
K&R In my world EW would be a centrist. raouldukelives Jul 2013 #29
I'm pretty far left, almost to point of being socialist. You've peaked my curiosity. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #43
Because I don't consider anything that Warren asks for being more than common sense. raouldukelives Jul 2013 #55
Bernie Sanders has been there much longer than E. Warren. xtraxritical Jul 2013 #59
And then how about a better anti-trust law? Something to breakup ANY "too big to fail." tclambert Jul 2013 #30
How about something simpler. Just don't bail them out when they fail. PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #46
And why in the hell have we not done this already? DirkGently Jul 2013 #31
Why is this Woman Not. BillyRibs Jul 2013 #34
K&R.... midnight Jul 2013 #36
Kicked and Recommended! Enthusiast Jul 2013 #39
K&R Warren DeMontague Jul 2013 #41
Got an email from her on this today... Jasana Jul 2013 #42
It would be great to get it passed davidpdx Jul 2013 #49
This makes total sense to me. DCBob Jul 2013 #51
K & R ctsnowman Jul 2013 #52
Wow! Le Taz Hot Jul 2013 #54
Positive game changer for the USA! avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #69
Love Elizabeth Warren! tweeternik Jul 2013 #70
K&R..Thanks for posting. red dog 1 Jul 2013 #73
rec rec rec +++ Elizabeth Warren for President. Whisp Jul 2013 #76
Sounds like a pass to me. RB TexLa Jul 2013 #78
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2013 #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren Introduc...»Reply #3