Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
4. We don't need all women to do it.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 02:17 PM
Feb 2012

We just need a bunch of them to vote against those morons. And according to the most recent polls, it's working.

Nobody can ever convince everyone to do anything. It's not necessary.

Sounds like someone is off base here. I'm a retired middle class woman with no cause to shraby Feb 2012 #1
I was an Independent for 30 years HockeyMom Feb 2012 #2
see that's the thing Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #5
That's because they have the good insurance the Repubs want to deny people muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #39
we can't just hope they'll have empathy Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #42
They have the cover; they know it's a good thing muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #45
so let's just assume that and only go after liberals? Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #51
Now you seem to be advocating reacting to public opinion muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #55
No...I'm saying we need to tell voters even conservatives why progressive benefit everyone Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #57
I'm not saying it'll work on all middle class women... Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #3
When 98% of all women use them? HockeyMom Feb 2012 #20
I agree it's do as I do not as I say... Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #22
I am 70 and I am angry. They have no right to make these moral judgements against women. I am jwirr Feb 2012 #16
We don't need anger we need to be proactive Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #19
So why can't we do both? jwirr Feb 2012 #21
we can be motivated by anger Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #23
Absolutely. jwirr Feb 2012 #24
Another 70 year old who will be right there with you. kiranon Feb 2012 #30
Your post makes me smile. So true. If men think about it they would be the ones fighting for birth jwirr Feb 2012 #32
We don't need all women to do it. MineralMan Feb 2012 #4
the polls are a progressive weakness Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #8
Obama designed the rules saying all insurance must cover birth control muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #40
Obama is the one who balked and put in the religion exemption... Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #43
He changed the rules so that all women will be covered muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #46
he could have just done that in the first place Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #52
Huh? What exemption are you saying he put in? muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #54
there was an exemption for religious institutions in the original requirement Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #60
That's churches themselves, not church-run hospitals, universities and so on muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #62
an ideal world? Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #69
Are you sure that includes the religions themselves? muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #80
Birth Control is a losing issue for the GOP. mick063 Feb 2012 #6
I like Rachel but she can be naive Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #11
I don't know - there are some signs already of a backlash against the Republicans on this.... yellowcanine Feb 2012 #7
You underestimate the impact of this GOP theater. AtomicKitten Feb 2012 #9
only if the issues are debated at face value Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #13
The GOP is tone deaf on women's issues and I agree they use subterfuge AtomicKitten Feb 2012 #15
Santorum is a gift to us Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #18
It effects men too -- are you too confident in men too? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #10
depends on the man Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #17
Until they end up paying child support justiceischeap Feb 2012 #34
You're not confident enough that women will stand up for their own well-being against the GOP. FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #12
no I'm not Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #14
Lots of things "could" happen and nobody can predict the future Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2012 #44
I agree the GOP going too far right may just hurt them.. Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #53
2004 was much different Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2012 #58
Male Vasectomies SHOULD be covered too HockeyMom Feb 2012 #25
insurance would oppose covering that without copay Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #26
My husband's in '84 was outpaitent and had a co-pay HockeyMom Feb 2012 #27
My wife really pestered me to become a "sport model" mick063 Feb 2012 #28
Guys, your woman will really appreciate it, during MENOPAUSE HockeyMom Feb 2012 #29
Do you have a link where republicans are framing on the issue of "free" birth control? CTyankee Feb 2012 #31
No, I was saying they are framing it as a handout... Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #49
And what I am trying to tell you is that women hear what you have just said and think CTyankee Feb 2012 #50
oh, definitely on Santorum I agree Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #56
and if he is the repub. nominee for president, what will other republicans do? CTyankee Feb 2012 #68
If Santorum gets nominated I bet he'll focus on the economy and be more general on Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #70
do you honestly believe that the Dems will let him run only on the economy? CTyankee Feb 2012 #81
I think you missed the point DearAbby Feb 2012 #33
This is the critical point! I don't know if the OP is male or female but CTyankee Feb 2012 #35
+++ to both this and the post to which is being replied. salin Feb 2012 #36
and that's why the right is not overtly saying to ban birth control.. Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #41
Oh, but they ARE overtly saying to ban birth control... CTyankee Feb 2012 #47
as I said before Santorum is a different story... Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #64
I agree. They couldn't go over the cliff any more dramatically IMO... CTyankee Feb 2012 #67
insult or not...the frame of slutty women has worked for the right.. Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #37
You keep on saying how effective their strategy is...I am beginning to wonder about CTyankee Feb 2012 #48
I'm not glad when they are effective.. Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #61
It seems to me that the RW is only effective when they can marginalize issues to their CTyankee Feb 2012 #65
Maybe but I never thought I'd hear a letter about contraception read at church either Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #72
and I'll bet you weren't the only Catholic who thought that! CTyankee Feb 2012 #74
I said it was a free commercial for Obama... Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #76
Really? Rex Feb 2012 #59
it worked enough to reelect Bush.. Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #63
No, the 'lockdown' in Ohio worked to get Bush relected Rex Feb 2012 #66
Thank you. n/t myrna minx Feb 2012 #38
If Santorum is the candidate they can be confident marlakay Feb 2012 #71
a President cannot ban birth control without Congress Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #73
What evidence, relative to this particular context, LanternWaste Feb 2012 #75
what do you mean? trend towards what? Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #77
Historical voting trends for women in the past 35 years are contrary to this statement... LanternWaste Feb 2012 #78
I never said additional female voters.. Green_Lantern Feb 2012 #79
If they don't gain voters then what is the concern? TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some progressives are too...»Reply #4