Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
19. Z has to try and convince the jury that the killing
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 09:57 AM
Jun 2013

Last edited Sun Jun 30, 2013, 10:39 AM - Edit history (2)

was in self defense. The Prosecution will base its case in chief on the idea that 1) there was no self defense, therefore 2) Z killing him was done without legal justification. The burden is then on them to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. They will try and establish as many facts through evidence presented and testimony as possible which indicate the depraved mind standard required for a verdict of Murder 2.

All that is required is reasonable doubt. longship Jun 2013 #1
Actually, since Zimmerman is claiming self defense COLGATE4 Jun 2013 #2
Informative. Thanks. longship Jun 2013 #3
But doesn't the prosecution need to prove a "depraved mind" for 2nd? dkf Jun 2013 #4
Yes. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #6
Not correct, 2nd degree murder defined: demwing Jun 2013 #8
"(E)vincing a depraved mind regardless of human life..." NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #9
That's not intent. It's state of mind. DirkGently Jun 2013 #11
Exactly demwing Jun 2013 #15
782.07 Manslaugher: demwing Jun 2013 #13
Interesting statute. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #14
jury instructions on 782.04(2) ... ctaylors6 Jun 2013 #16
"demonstrating a depraved mind" demwing Jun 2013 #18
Z has to try and convince the jury that the killing COLGATE4 Jun 2013 #19
So if I ever claim self-defense I'm guilty until proven innocent. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #21
In an affirmative defense you are admitting COLGATE4 Jun 2013 #22
As I understand it... NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #5
With COLGATE4's "affirmative defense" clue demwing Jun 2013 #7
I think that's specific to the insanity defense. DirkGently Jun 2013 #10
Thank you, that's much more definitive demwing Jun 2013 #17
Here's my understanding ... ctaylors6 Jun 2013 #12
Your post spells it all out. dkf Jun 2013 #20
Thank you. Caroline-Vivienne Jun 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tell me about the burden ...»Reply #19