Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So 2016 will be a Clinton vs. a Bush? [View all]MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)28. Back in 2007, a good friend of mine told me that this was actually the case
He told me that Obama had been anointed by the bankers, and that Gephardt had been paid off to give Obama his staff and that the fix was in, blah, blah, blah.
I was Probama at the time, and thought my buddy was nuts. And my buddy always sounds nuts, but usually ends up being right.
And here we are.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Howard Dean has said he might run if progressives are not being served.
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2013
#17
If he is running and has a chance of being the "not Hillary" in the primary, he has my vote
karynnj
Jun 2013
#45
Nobody named Bush or Clinton should be allowed within a 10 mile radius of the White House
tularetom
Jun 2013
#21
Yes. The Establishment met in 2007 to determine who the next President should be.
Nye Bevan
Jun 2013
#25
Back in 2007, a good friend of mine told me that this was actually the case
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2013
#28
It strikes me the GOP is good at nominating the least insane of their candidates.
BlueCheese
Jun 2013
#51
I would offer you a beer, but i only have Coors :p and some dont consider it alcohol
darkangel218
Jun 2013
#54