Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amerciti001

(158 posts)
9. I'm with you on this point...
Wed May 15, 2013, 06:51 PM
May 2013

are these so called groups really engaged in Social Welfare for the common good? What proof is there that all of these group do spend for the general welfare of the community? I think that this will come out one day that in fact all of these groups were nothing more than political front groups just for the collection of campaign money, that'll be used for local, state and federal elections campaign.

Remember, 501(c)4 organizations do have limited political lobbying, over that of a 501(c)3 organization. My greatest thought is that all of these so called 501(c)4, will eventually apply for government grants to further there so called social welfare programs. Anyone needs a new gun range in their community, to educate the people on gun safety and such gun nonsense. 501(c)4 organizations can apply for grants for something like this.

"91 applications had no indication of significant political campaign intervention." Scuba May 2013 #1
I'm not sure what you mean about "kept the money" W_HAMILTON May 2013 #2
If they didn't spend it on campaigning, what did they spend it on? Themselves? Scuba May 2013 #4
I think this is more about scrutinization at the application level. W_HAMILTON May 2013 #5
In theory at least, it would mean they spent it on promoting "social welfare" Dragonfli May 2013 #6
+1,000 Scuba May 2013 #7
The president is about to speak "on the situation regarding the Internal Revenue Service" W_HAMILTON May 2013 #8
I'm with you on this point... amerciti001 May 2013 #9
"Social welfare" or "social services" is about as vague as you can be. former9thward May 2013 #13
hahahahaha! Baitball Blogger May 2013 #3
The issue is not whether there was political activity - political activity is perfectly legal hack89 May 2013 #10
That's not the issue at hand. W_HAMILTON May 2013 #11
Except the inspectors were specifically told to concentrate on conservative organizations hack89 May 2013 #12
If screening of these applications is anything like how the IRS determines who to audit... W_HAMILTON May 2013 #15
The IRS says the criteria was inappropriate and wrong hack89 May 2013 #17
Every single conservative organization's application was flagged for additional review. hack89 May 2013 #14
That's incorrect. W_HAMILTON May 2013 #16
And the IRS says the criteria was inappropriate. hack89 May 2013 #18
The criteria is inappropriate because it gave the appearance of being politically motivated. W_HAMILTON May 2013 #20
IDGI - is the OP suggesting that statistics can be used to justify harrassment? reformist2 May 2013 #19
The OP (me) is suggesting that... W_HAMILTON May 2013 #21
It appears we will need several gross of smelling salts and couches Dragonfli May 2013 #22
Hehe. W_HAMILTON May 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»82% of the IRS-targeted T...»Reply #9