General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)You are wrong. It's not about a 'disagreement'. It's not an opinion.
Just look at all the articles about her legacy all over the media this week, both positive spins or negative analysis.
No one can claim that she is inconsequential in world history, whether they love her or hate her.
This is not my opinion. She was a major figure in the advancement of an economic system that continues to impact the whole world, in addition to her domestic policies for which she is roundly criticized. Whether or not that impact is 'good' or 'bad' may come down to opinion in the philosophical sense, but you are claiming that she is "an otherwise rather inconsequential figure in world history".
I won't go so far to call you daft for it, though. Just clueless. It's probably not your fault