General Discussion

opiate69

(10,129 posts)

26. "Guys"??? No, dear.. you see..

Reply to boston bean (Reply #24)

Sun Apr 7, 2013, 09:09 PM

Apr 2013

unlike some of your little buddies, in our group, one poster = 1 screen name. No socks necessary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

109 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] boston bean Apr 2013 OP

Women get lower payouts for a longer time on average Warpy Apr 2013 #1

Believe, I'm not the one saying it, or looking at actuarial tables boston bean Apr 2013 #4

No. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #2

I think it is bigoted against same sex couples who are denied equal treatment. Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #3

... and that is the truth! etherealtruth Apr 2013 #20

+1000 DURHAM D Apr 2013 #23

That's where I find the real bigotry, too. Warpy Apr 2013 #33

Right there is the truth! Sissyk Apr 2013 #37

You could at least have the courage theKed Apr 2013 #5

Yes, here is the text that brought this question on. boston bean Apr 2013 #6

I am not familiar enough with the math and legislation in question theKed Apr 2013 #8

The group that really gets screwwed over in SS VanillaRhapsody Apr 2013 #7

Exactly true. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #12

except when they do die younger they tend to leave young survivors who collect dsc Apr 2013 #60

It isn't racist either. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #9

Equal pay is not law of the land. What you wrote is pure hogwash! boston bean Apr 2013 #10

Are you really that poor of a reader? lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #13

Yes, she is. opiate69 Apr 2013 #15

If she's going to troll safe haven groups looking for outrages to share... lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #19

I'm afraid in her mind, it ain't a fact unless some knucklehead blogger sez so. opiate69 Apr 2013 #22

You guys in the mens group posted something boston bean Apr 2013 #24

"Guys"??? No, dear.. you see.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #26

You have something you want to say about me? boston bean Apr 2013 #29

Just that you might do well to quit worrying about the men's group opiate69 Apr 2013 #30

Take your own advice. boston bean Apr 2013 #34

Well.. with the amazing powers to educate that you seem to think you possess, you might notice.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #39

Oh, you could alert on the post for SOP violation. Did you? nt boston bean Apr 2013 #40

Considering two of our hosts actually commented in it, I figure it falls within SOP just fine. opiate69 Apr 2013 #41

are you accusing me of having a sock? If so, put up or shut up. boston bean Apr 2013 #42

Nope.. just a subtle reminder that... opiate69 Apr 2013 #48

Yeah, that proves something or nothing. boston bean Apr 2013 #49

I don't really care who or what she was alerting on.. the fact that she had to try to circumvent opiate69 Apr 2013 #54

You just implied I can't use big words. boston bean Apr 2013 #55

Oh, I don't know.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #57

Yeah tell me about it! i agree with you 100% boston bean Apr 2013 #62

Well.. find examples of me twisting your words, or creating strawmen out of your "arguments". opiate69 Apr 2013 #65

find me examples of me doing that to you. I won't hold my breath. boston bean Apr 2013 #68

well.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #72

go for it. more petty accusations. boston bean Apr 2013 #79

Oh, I don't know.. a fuck of a lot in just this one thread though.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #83

I have nothing to apologize for. If I felt I needed to apologize for anything boston bean Apr 2013 #87

Ah yes.. always a justification, an excuse, and ever the victim. opiate69 Apr 2013 #89

Yes, I was very much the victim in that hide. boston bean Apr 2013 #101

when you say the law of the land, you mean it's actually enforced? boston bean Apr 2013 #21

Yes. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #27

Wow! 62.5 Million... seems like a lot huh? boston bean Apr 2013 #36

Different jobs should have different ages for social security eligibility. reformist2 Apr 2013 #11

that makes sense to me BainsBane Apr 2013 #16

The intimate knowledge that some have with HOF BainsBane Apr 2013 #14

... opiate69 Apr 2013 #17

That's just fascinatingly cute... pacalo Apr 2013 #95

OMG! That's awesome!! opiate69 Apr 2013 #100

Haven't I... theKed Apr 2013 #28

And there you go again The Straight Story Apr 2013 #51

"I didn't agree with a bunch of gays on here about those snickers ads back during the superbowl." boston bean Apr 2013 #64

Shit.. there goes another Irony Meter. opiate69 Apr 2013 #67

Let's see if he takes it to heart. boston bean Apr 2013 #69

I adress actual issues all the time.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #73

Ok, me too then. Right back at ya! boston bean Apr 2013 #77

"Derailing"!! Woot! Two more for Bingo!! opiate69 Apr 2013 #80

more pettiness. We can both play this game, I guess. boston bean Apr 2013 #81

Oh, but I don't "follow you around the board". opiate69 Apr 2013 #84

Probably most of all last work week. boston bean Apr 2013 #86

lmao.. trust me, you're not nearly important enough to me for me to bother with obsessing over. opiate69 Apr 2013 #88

Well, you said you saw me a lot in GD over the past week. boston bean Apr 2013 #94

And you wonder why I accuse you of intellectual dishonesty? opiate69 Apr 2013 #99

Your words were one scroll on the mouse wheel away boston bean Apr 2013 #102

And somehow, that translates into "I saw you a lot in GD over the past week"? opiate69 Apr 2013 #107

As I suspected.. IOKIYARF opiate69 Apr 2013 #97

What am I to take from those links? boston bean Apr 2013 #103

Really? The Straight Story Apr 2013 #76

Hey you are the one who wrote it. Seemed sort of angry to me. boston bean Apr 2013 #78

Heh The Straight Story Apr 2013 #82

Well... boston bean Apr 2013 #85

I actually don't dislike you The Straight Story Apr 2013 #93

Well.. kudos for not calling MN a dipshit this time around. opiate69 Apr 2013 #18

who knows dsc Apr 2013 #25

huh? Why do women earn less and put in less? boston bean Apr 2013 #32

now they likely don't put in less dsc Apr 2013 #35

That is not what he said. boston bean Apr 2013 #38

and women might dsc Apr 2013 #45

Is what you just said sexist against men. boston bean Apr 2013 #46

SS isn't designed to be even dsc Apr 2013 #50

So your answer is no it is not sexist against men? boston bean Apr 2013 #52

By design the answer is clearly no dsc Apr 2013 #56

So, it is sexist against men? boston bean Apr 2013 #61

It would depend on the definition of sexism dsc Apr 2013 #74

It just depends on whether you want to look at it based on equality or outcomes Major Nikon Apr 2013 #106

actually they can dsc Apr 2013 #108

Nope. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #31

Jesus. Fucking. Christ. one_voice Apr 2013 #43

You beat me to it... zappaman Apr 2013 #44

Are you for or against me? boston bean Apr 2013 #47

That very odd phrasing... one_voice Apr 2013 #58

Well the forehead slap felt rather personal. boston bean Apr 2013 #59

No need to be sorry... one_voice Apr 2013 #63

ok boston bean Apr 2013 #66

Why is it always sexism with a particular topic with particular people? Apophis Apr 2013 #53

Do you think the pay gap is sexist? Major Nikon Apr 2013 #70

But equal pay does address the actual outcomes. boston bean Apr 2013 #75

If the Equal Pay act doesn't address it, then what makes you think the ERA will? Major Nikon Apr 2013 #90

You claim the ERA will get rid of all those pesky boston bean Apr 2013 #96

Strawman rhetoric doesn't work on me Major Nikon Apr 2013 #104

Hey you're the one who makes that argument boston bean Apr 2013 #105

CIVILIZED nations actually recognize the monetary value of "women's work" Hekate Apr 2013 #71

I think the original post in the men's group is ridiculous. stevenleser Apr 2013 #91

The main issue is divorced women collecting on the former husband's earning record FarCenter Apr 2013 #92

If men didn't earn more, they wouldn't pay in more. correct? boston bean Apr 2013 #98

I'm going to bed. I don't have time to baby sit this thread boston bean Apr 2013 #109