Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Noam Chomsky Is the Subject of Relentless Attacks by Corporate Media and Establishment [View all]Kurovski
(34,655 posts)13. I found a lecture on Netflix, and the sound was so low
no matter how high you put the volune, it was impossible to hear.
Why does everyone want to make me so paranoid? it had to be an accident, right?
I was at someone else's house, but I should have complained to nf,I must have been suffering an excess of complaint that day.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Noam Chomsky Is the Subject of Relentless Attacks by Corporate Media and Establishment [View all]
Fantastic Anarchist
Mar 2013
OP
Lovely defense of Chomsky and good to hear that Greenwald is working on a new book...
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#1
DU and the Democratic Party have plenty of conservatives. They call themselves Democrats
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#6
That's the problem with conflating a political party with philosophy. The republican party was the
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#28
YVW as well, and you can. Select the OP, click on the reply you wish to bookmark, then bookmark as
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#47
I can kind of sort of see people attacking Chomsky here on DU (and have) ...
Fantastic Anarchist
Mar 2013
#7
It is almost impossible to be "unbiased". Especially history, which IMO is heavily biased one way
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#30
I believe that we all have different levels of denial we use to maintain our sanity.
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#31
It's Alternet's headline. The original from The Guardian is titled, "How Noam Chomsky is Discussed"
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#14
You are confusing the Watergate break in with Ellsberg shrink's attempted
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#25
Are you referring to this part. "Nixon White House officials sought to steal the files from Daniel
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#33
I am confused as to why you are discussing the Watergate breakin. Did Greenwald mention Watergate?nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#40
No problem. We are all friends here. Well most of us. Well a couple of us.
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#42