Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
42. Personally
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 02:25 PM
Mar 2013

I have never seen "RW drivel" jump all over one of their own as they do with Graham. That's not friendly talk in my opinion.

"Graham is a warmonger. A senator who signs on to Graham’s warmongering resolution identifies himself or herself as a warmonger. Co-sponsoring SR 65 identifies a senator clearly as making one of the most serious possible misjudgments that a legislator can make. Very few matters rise to the importance of launching an aggressive war against another nation without justification."

Does this carry the force of law? Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2013 #1
I think he can ignore it. They can't tell the President when to start a war. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #19
Thanks Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2013 #38
"Please, Mr. President, start the war we're afraid to declare." n/t Orsino Mar 2013 #40
I think every country in the world should have nukes, or NO COUNTRY in the world should have them. sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #2
Well said. nt woo me with science Mar 2013 #24
I could not agree more. CrispyQ Mar 2013 #27
We need to do whatever it takes to stop the Ayatollahs getting nukes. Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author damnedifIknow Mar 2013 #4
And yet Pakistan and North Korea are fine... Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #5
oh please. this absurd panic over Iran is pathetic cali Mar 2013 #11
So you think that President Obama is being "pathetic" Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #16
no. I don't think he will order an attack on Iran cali Mar 2013 #17
what does this picture say about threats green for victory Mar 2013 #37
They voted ProSense Mar 2013 #39
Personally damnedifIknow Mar 2013 #42
Assuming that is their goal, I agree, but that assumption may not be correct. stevenleser Mar 2013 #22
"Were parties here divided merely by a greediness for office,...to take a part with either would be Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2013 #6
"as Pat Buchanan explains" geek tragedy Mar 2013 #7
Sometimes Pat is right. Doesn't make him a great human being. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #20
You are quoting a bunch of right wing nuts that are being fast and loose with the truth. tritsofme Mar 2013 #8
We do not need a war with Iran. It would be political and economic suicide for us. Initech Mar 2013 #9
lewrockwell.com? seriously? bigoted, dog shit paleoconservative cali Mar 2013 #10
I remember getting quite a bit of info damnedifIknow Mar 2013 #12
Not at all a parallel universe, but consistency with liberal values. cali Mar 2013 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author damnedifIknow Mar 2013 #14
the article making sense, poppet, doesn't justify the hateful shit site. cali Mar 2013 #15
This comes from a hard-right libertarian site; and the author is a extremist libertarian who rejects LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author damnedifIknow Mar 2013 #23
To clarify: Obama's current position is, if Iran actually develops A WEAPON, we will TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #21
So we should be taking action then against all countries that have nukes?? sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #25
North Korea is an example of the bad things that happen when crazy people TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #28
Well from their pov, and we are not the only ones entitled to a pov, they are safe from an invasion sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #30
Some days I'm just not as down on America as others on DU. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #31
Well, it's easy not to be down on the US when you are not a victim of its policies. I could ignore sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #33
You use Lew Rockwell as a credible source? greatauntoftriplets Mar 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author damnedifIknow Mar 2013 #29
Pretty soon ProSense Mar 2013 #41
I'd suggested 10 years ago a provision Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #32
You wanted Chelsea Clinton on the front line in Iraq? (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #34
Um, why not? Romulox Mar 2013 #35
I want every "yes" vote to have some skin in the game Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #42