Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
yeah, thank Jeebus for the Obama supporters setting us all right, eh? provis99 Dec 2011 #1
thought you were serious for a minute limpyhobbler Dec 2011 #2
I did too. He should be careful doing that to an old man that's already on the edge. nm rhett o rick Dec 2011 #65
And THAT is why I give away my jokes Zalatix Dec 2011 #82
K&R Solly Mack Dec 2011 #3
It's just what the USA PATRIOT Act ordered. Octafish Dec 2011 #4
K&R DeSwiss Dec 2011 #5
Finally, here is the text Turley is referring to: JDPriestly Dec 2011 #42
Turley is correct - Obama should veto this bill. TBF Dec 2011 #54
That's out of date. I just looked at the conference report in the Cong Record beginning at H8356. struggle4progress Dec 2011 #57
Thank You, JDP On the Road Dec 2011 #59
Can you explain the existing law or authorities on the topic of unlimited detention JDPriestly Dec 2011 #81
I'm Sure It *Is* Unclear On the Road Dec 2011 #83
The existing law should be changed as I understand it. Codifying existing law JDPriestly Dec 2011 #86
OK -- Fair Enough. Maybe it Should be Clarifying On the Road Dec 2011 #87
Good point. Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch said much the same. suffragette Dec 2011 #77
it's TALLIBURTON!!!11 you now must go straight to prison11! StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #6
ummm it does allow indefinite imprisonment of US citizens Cronus Protagonist Dec 2011 #7
How and where are the Armed Forces policing US citizens? TheDebbieDee Dec 2011 #10
You're being a bit too literal Demstud Dec 2011 #73
Sorry, I was being sarcastic, of course you're right. MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #13
My guess is once they realize you are a citizen you will be released rustydog Dec 2011 #79
kickeroo frylock Dec 2011 #8
Turley: This leave Ron Paul as the only candidate in the presidential campaign ProSense Dec 2011 #9
Isn't it pathetic that Ron Paul is in favor of civil rights? MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #12
Yeah, ProSense Dec 2011 #14
So what's your point? MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #15
No ProSense Dec 2011 #16
So you're OK with indefinite imprisonment of US citizens with zero judicial recourse? MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #17
No ProSense Dec 2011 #18
So are you claiming that the NDAA does not authorize indefinite imprisonment of US citizens MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #19
Here ProSense Dec 2011 #20
It's not a *requirement*, but it's an *option*. So I ask again MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #23
Again ProSense Dec 2011 #26
You simply haven't answered the question. MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #28
No ProSense Dec 2011 #31
I don't see a "yes" or "no" answer. Unless MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #34
If the 34 post-per-day average of your debate partner is to be maintained, ... xocet Dec 2011 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #29
Yup, says it isn't a requirement and then in another sub-section it punts it back to TheKentuckian Dec 2011 #33
You don't understand what 'requirement' means in legispeak. The Doctor. Dec 2011 #46
Maybe it doesnt matter as long as the Pres is a Democrat. nm rhett o rick Dec 2011 #62
I posted the actual text that is JDPriestly Dec 2011 #43
forget about Ron Paul, Suddenly Turley has gone off the deep end, did you view Turley in this light 2banon Dec 2011 #27
But, but, but this president is a Democrat. How could you even think to question a Democrat? rhett o rick Dec 2011 #61
"zero judicial oversight" boppers Dec 2011 #36
So what role does Obama agree that the courts have MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #38
Already established in Hamdi. boppers Dec 2011 #41
"The plurality held that judges need not be involved in reviewing these cases, ... MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #45
Thank you. That's an important point. Seems to me that means the president rhett o rick Dec 2011 #63
.00000001% is not zero eom boppers Dec 2011 #70
Actually. it is. MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #72
How quaint, lets just set in stone the practices of George W Jim_Shorts Dec 2011 #76
I believe that was his son, the jr senator from KY WCGreen Dec 2011 #51
Indeed. Union Scribe Dec 2011 #25
Don't fall for the our side just doesn't see how bad they are manipulation lunatica Dec 2011 #49
Ron Paul is in favor of his own version of what he calls "civil rights" Major Nikon Dec 2011 #85
Turley is a libertarian and evidently a Paulite: struggle4progress Dec 2011 #35
He endorses Paul in exactly zero of those links. MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #39
Turley clearly likes Paul better than any other candidate. They share an anti-regulatory agenda, struggle4progress Dec 2011 #52
lolol TBF Dec 2011 #64
Du rec. Nt xchrom Dec 2011 #11
Not the first time DU has nailed the fucker grantcart Dec 2011 #21
Nope. Looks like Turley is consistant... Luminous Animal Dec 2011 #30
And let's not be distracted by the fact he was right on each occassion. EFerrari Dec 2011 #44
occupy nt Zorra Dec 2011 #22
The greatest compliment! Thanks you! nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #24
LOL! G_j Dec 2011 #32
Kick... AzDar Dec 2011 #37
does section 1031 really follow section 1032? hfojvt Dec 2011 #40
He's not saying 1031 follows sequentially from 1032 Major Nikon Dec 2011 #84
This law is a travisty. blackspade Dec 2011 #47
So can we now accept that the lines in the sand have been drawn? lunatica Dec 2011 #48
Not a line in the sand Autumn Dec 2011 #50
I dread to imagine JEB Dec 2011 #53
Umm, he's right a2liberal Dec 2011 #55
Laws, schmaws has been the official policy for many years now. harmonicon Dec 2011 #56
All I know for sure is that any law Bernie and Al vote against hootinholler Dec 2011 #58
Especially if the ACLU is also opposed - TBF Dec 2011 #66
Right on. nm rhett o rick Dec 2011 #67
Representative Nadler explained it in floor debate. ohwinston Dec 2011 #60
Here, here. nm rhett o rick Dec 2011 #68
Hoist by your own petard. saras Dec 2011 #69
What about Habeas Corpus? MannyGoldstein Dec 2011 #71
Kick for truth. UnrepentantLiberal Dec 2011 #74
thank you..it's a great thing that here on DU we always have people who can explain why we did not Douglas Carpenter Dec 2011 #78
So why does this guy still get airtime on Countdown with Keith Olbermann? alp227 Dec 2011 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jonathan Turley is a Liar...»Reply #22