Reply #212

In the discussion thread: Dear DU: Fuck Rand Paul [View all]

Thu Mar 7, 2013, 04:46 PM

DevonRex (19,957 posts)

212. Um, you might wanna check out his actual opinion on drones before you go agreeing with him.

Last edited Thu Mar 7, 2013, 04:51 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

And Holder spoke only of a Pearl Harbor sort of attack or a 9/11 sort of attack and said of course we could respond militarily in those cases. Didn't mention drones at all.
He's the AG. Read him like an attorney.
rand Paul is a John Birch asshole. Read him like he has an agenda. One that Holder didn't play along with.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

221 replies	Author	Time	Post
Dear DU: Fuck Rand Paul [View all]	Stinky The Clown	Mar 6	OP
K&R for a voice of reason. nt	Comrade_McKenzie	Mar 6	#1
This isn't your best work, Stinky.	Buzz Clik	Mar 6	#2
Hey, object rape threads are cool now.	Common Sense Party	Mar 6	#83
I agree. I never give	No Vested Interest	Mar 7	#131
I sure as fuck do. All the fucking time.	Iggo	Mar 7	#180
I disagree.	Cary	Mar 7	#165
Is he also behind the National Right-to-Work bill?	Kingofalldems	Mar 6	#3
I'll answer my own question-yes Paul is behind	Kingofalldems	Mar 6	#9
Fought to stop raising the Debt Ceiling over Personhood, defunding PP, food stamps, etc.	freshwest	Mar 6	#86
Another Fuck Rand Paul here...	Ohio Joe	Mar 6	#4
Touche, Mr. Clown. Touche. nt	Honeycombe8	Mar 6	#5
Well, I have standards...........but agree with the gist of the sentiment.	PDJane	Mar 6	#6
Fuck Rand Paul!	bluedigger	Mar 6	#7
Thank you, too. I'd have left the vegetable reference out of the OP, though.	freshwest	Mar 6	#88
Yeah, that's why I spoke for myself.	bluedigger	Mar 6	#91
Yup the veg out the rest stays!	sheshe2	Mar 7	#129
Agreed!	freshwest	Mar 7	#203
This message was self-deleted by its author	onehandle	Mar 6	#8
I say , leave the husks on the ear	DollarBillHines	Mar 6	#12
You mean his wig. nt	onehandle	Mar 6	#16
I'll mark you down as one more object rape-supporter.	Common Sense Party	Mar 6	#97
Please delete. The Holder-haters post the same thing about him.	freshwest	Mar 6	#98
Yay! MORE violent object rape cheering!	Common Sense Party	Mar 6	#85
Fuck political correctness! n/t	backscatter712	Mar 7	#168
I'd also rationalize it by merely calling it PC...	LanternWaste	Mar 7	#204
Thank you.	freshwest	Mar 6	#90
Please be kind enough to explain	G_j	Mar 7	#164
Indeed...	one_voice	Mar 6	#10
Plus a zillion	graham4anything	Mar 6	#35
See reply below yours #92.	freshwest	Mar 6	#93
Plus a million to that. Guess I'll have to pull this one out for the same crowd:	freshwest	Mar 6	#92
This should be pinned to the GD and the Politics 2013 sections forever.	graham4anything	Mar 7	#147
Anyone who has read that article and understands it, knows the basis of much of the TOS.	freshwest	Mar 7	#186
Excellent read!!!..	one_voice	Mar 7	#197
YW. I think some people are being misled by these guys. Many aren't, but some will take the bait.	freshwest	Mar 7	#202
Interesting article...	TommyCelt	Mar 7	#211
It's context as well. Some have skewered Brennan, who they confused with Bremer, not the same animal	freshwest	Mar 7	#214
Oh Bravo!!	Ratty	Mar 7	#217
Fuck drones too.	Warren Stupidity	Mar 6	#11
Except no one looks to a broken clock for the time. nt	Comrade_McKenzie	Mar 6	#15
And we call people who do "idiots."	Robb	Mar 6	#20
This.	riqster	Mar 6	#26
+1	Politicub	Mar 6	#45
Huge K&R!!...nt	SidDithers	Mar 6	#13
Pretty much. I don't think Republicans suddenly give a rat's ass about civil liberties	TwilightGardener	Mar 6	#14
Where the hell are they now?	Abq_Sarah	Mar 6	#28
Maybe Democrats don't want to filibuster Brennan based on Holder's hypotheticals.	TwilightGardener	Mar 6	#42
Do you really believe	Abq_Sarah	Mar 6	#72
Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee already demanded	TwilightGardener	Mar 6	#80
How long should we wait?	Abq_Sarah	Mar 7	#113
What did the administration do? Most I can see is that they dragged their feet handing	TwilightGardener	Mar 7	#118
You don't get it	Abq_Sarah	Mar 7	#120
The President does have a right to DEFEND us from an attack on our soil--	TwilightGardener	Mar 7	#122
He did not limit scenarios only to attacks in progress	Abq_Sarah	Mar 7	#141
Thank you! nt	Mojorabbit	Mar 7	#126
I agree...a Democrat should have been doing the filibustering.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Mar 6	#17
Our Democratic champions	OnyxCollie	Mar 6	#75
It would have meant a hell of a lot more...	1983law	Mar 7	#127
+55	Faryn Balyncd	Mar 7	#218
Not with anybody else's ten foot pole	Warpy	Mar 6	#18
WORST SENATOR EVER!!!!!	Initech	Mar 6	#19
No.	GoCubsGo	Mar 7	#178
True that is a very competitive category.	Initech	Mar 7	#184
Ted Cruz aka	mimi85	Mar 7	#213
This wouldn't happen	ForgoTheConsequence	Mar 6	#21
You don't have to think he is your friend to have the same question on something that he does.	MotherPetrie	Mar 6	#22
K&R to the moon, Stinky...	ReRe	Mar 6	#23
It says a lot.	ForgoTheConsequence	Mar 6	#24
It's about not showing support to a Bircher.	bluedigger	Mar 6	#40
Well, it's not like you're voting for him or anything like that	HoneychildMooseMoss	Mar 6	#52
Because that is what the Bircher's want.	bluedigger	Mar 6	#57
Rand Paul would use drones on Americans HIMSELF as long as they were poor, minorities,	DevonRex	Mar 6	#76
Yes, he would. They've added a weasel word to their exceptions already. It's on ProSense's thread.	freshwest	Mar 6	#94
Thanks. And here's a good link	DevonRex	Mar 7	#109
Definitely racist. More links for those who think he's any kind of liberal:	freshwest	Mar 7	#125
And I dug around. Glenn Beck thinks drones will be used on conservatives.	DevonRex	Mar 7	#196
Check the Angry Black Lady Chronicles for the scoop on this darling man - keep going, she's great:	freshwest	Mar 7	#201
I love both of them. Absolute heaven.	DevonRex	Mar 7	#205
You're also appreciated. And I love that cat!	freshwest	Mar 7	#208
Thanks, added the link to ProSense's detailed thread and will go that link, too.	freshwest	Mar 7	#207
If you're against the President people are cheering for your forcible sodomy???	NOVA_Dem	Mar 6	#51
Please don't assume too much. Some of us are having legitimate trouble with your messenger, RP's	patrice	Mar 7	#144
^^^^^^^^^^^^^BOOM^^^^^^^^^^^^^^	Dryvinwhileblind	Mar 7	#159
Thank you, Patrice!	freshwest	Mar 7	#192
Trying not to forget what happened to OUR troops & how much more profoundly horrible ALL	patrice	Mar 7	#198
Thank you, Stinky. Well said.	Demoiselle	Mar 6	#25
With a sandy lubricant, and a Drano enema for dessert,	riqster	Mar 6	#27
Ran Paul is an opportunist who is allied with Alex Jones who is a "One World Government" asshole.	Lint Head	Mar 6	#29
That's all this is, a dog whistle to the racist patriot movement.	freshwest	Mar 7	#100
Broken clocks are right twice a day	FreeBC	Mar 6	#30
See post #15	Politicub	Mar 6	#46
You're Right. Fuck that assclown.	Hayabusa	Mar 6	#31
Well, shit, Stinky.	cliffordu	Mar 6	#32
Apparently I'm on ignore, but that's just fine.	cliffordu	Mar 7	#138
.	patrice	Mar 7	#146
Welll....	cliffordu	Mar 7	#163
Roger fucking that dude!	lonestarnot	Mar 6	#33
Yes Rand Paul is an ass however,	Angry Dragon	Mar 6	#34
Ya, but one ok thing doesn't excuse him from being generally a FUCKHEAD !	RBInMaine	Mar 6	#64
I never said it did	Angry Dragon	Mar 7	#161
thanks for saying it loud and clear,	Cha	Mar 6	#36
+1!	sheshe2	Mar 7	#130
Simple-minded thinking is always going to come up short	quinnox	Mar 6	#37
And one ok thing doesn't excuse a THOUSAND fucked up things this ASSHOLE believes and does.	RBInMaine	Mar 6	#66
Fuck the Pauls. It's always the same group of DUers who come out of the woodwork	Politicub	Mar 6	#38
We are, and have been, infested with Paulbots.	bluedigger	Mar 6	#41
They've lost their home turf and are using DU to organize here. Is it working, IDK?	freshwest	Mar 7	#101
The same DUers that nitpick about everything the President does. nt	Comrade_McKenzie	Mar 6	#53
the same DUers that held the same opinion when bush was in office..	frylock	Mar 6	#67
His filibuster is not being done to protect the Constitution	Generic Brad	Mar 6	#39
K&R for unamiguous intent	WheelWalker	Mar 6	#43
Fuck.Rand.Paul!	TeamPooka	Mar 6	#44
Yes. but	Vanje	Mar 6	#47
This is being HYPED in a big way. Chill down. Doubt this would ever happen. Let's get real here.	RBInMaine	Mar 6	#69
Message auto-removed	GRENADE	Mar 6	#48
Why are people so bothered that we could agree with Paul on one issue?	LittleBlue	Mar 6	#49
So where are the Democrats?	MadHound	Mar 6	#50
Ron Wyden Was There... Harry Reid Showed Up, But Just To Ask Paul To Stop So They Could Vote...	WillyT	Mar 6	#54
Father and son does not deserves no praise	Iliyah	Mar 6	#55
So, they deserve praise?	MrSlayer	Mar 6	#60
Agreed...	awoke_in_2003	Mar 6	#56
k&r...	spanone	Mar 6	#58
Broken Clock Sr. and Broken Clock Jr.	Jamaal510	Mar 6	#59
Yep - Of Broken Clocks and... by Tim Wise.	freshwest	Mar 6	#95
He's a lobbyist for assault weapons manufacturers who make profits from 3rd-world VIOLENCE that	patrice	Mar 6	#61
Thank you, patrice, for putting his hypocrisy in view.	freshwest	Mar 7	#103
FuPaul	Blue Owl	Mar 6	#62
DUers, this is the FUCKNUT who said "the market" should dictate WHO should be served in restaurants.	RBInMaine	Mar 6	#63
Thank you many times over for that post.	freshwest	Mar 7	#133
Rand and Ron Paul are against ALL government spending, including for drones.	Zen Democrat	Mar 6	#65
+10000000000	LeftInTX	Mar 6	#96
I think they are good with local policing.	bluedigger	Mar 7	#110
Wrong, they're protecting un-regulated markets in the world's poor countries. nt	patrice	Mar 7	#145
and fuck that fucking Judas Paulite, Ron Wyden..	frylock	Mar 6	#68
LOL !!!	WillyT	Mar 6	#70
I respect Wyden. Fuck Rand Paul. He's a Bircher. They're	DevonRex	Mar 7	#108
i don't understand what all that has to do with being against targeted assassinations..	frylock	Mar 7	#117
He's NOT against targeted assassinations. Get a grip.	DevonRex	Mar 7	#128
The Ron Wyden that has expressed satisfaction with the administration's explanation	onenote	Mar 7	#111
i have all of st. rand's albums..	frylock	Mar 7	#115
You're confusing him!!!! He thought he had a good thing there. Hahaha.	DevonRex	Mar 7	#124
Except for Ron Paul collecting	Iliyah	Mar 6	#71
I don't have to "like" Rand Paul to necessarily think he's on the right side of an issue	fujiyama	Mar 6	#73
If his concern is drones he should file a bill	loyalsister	Mar 7	#121
He's doing this because he values American lives....	Spitfire of ATJ	Mar 6	#74
Ha! "Rand Paul is Cordially Invited to Kiss My Ass" by ABL	Cha	Mar 6	#87
Damn straight.	freshwest	Mar 7	#105
Excellent!	bluedigger	Mar 7	#112
Rude, crude, and correct! Well said, Stinky	mountain grammy	Mar 6	#77
Awkward situation, isn't it?	Nye Bevan	Mar 6	#78
Wow... I mean...	MrMickeysMom	Mar 6	#79
Exactly right and he ain't doin' it for the left...	Drunken Irishman	Mar 6	#81
Thank. You.	freshwest	Mar 6	#82
Obama feels he has much to prove to the security establishment	cprise	Mar 6	#84
Guess what? Rand Paul had to pee and now my President's nomination goes through...	Comrade_McKenzie	Mar 7	#135
Pres O pants are fittin	Iliyah	Mar 6	#89
Rand Paul	nevergiveup	Mar 7	#99
K&R for speaking truth to power! eom	BlueCaliDem	Mar 7	#102
Amen. I'm Texan, I saw the first run of this play, starring his lunatic father.	Justitia	Mar 7	#104
+1,000	freshwest	Mar 7	#106
Is it ok if I just "don't LISTEN to Rand Paul"?	Ken Burch	Mar 7	#107
Courage to fight for your rights from someone you despise.	Delzars	Mar 7	#114
Delzars, a hard core nut case would ignore	Iliyah	Mar 7	#123
Thanks for sharing.	cliffordu	Mar 7	#137
I agree. I still don't like Brennen though, and would love to see him blocked.	morningfog	Mar 7	#116
Message auto-removed	I Cant Dance	Mar 7	#119
I'm a little fuzzy on your post Stinky. Could you clarify?	Kennah	Mar 7	#132
Who praised Rand Paul?	whatchamacallit	Mar 7	#134
Nothing.	bravenak	Mar 7	#136
.	blkmusclmachine	Mar 7	#139
Sometimes . . .	caseymoz	Mar 7	#140
Please see my post #61 above. & Why is the anti-drone position apparently pretending there is no	patrice	Mar 7	#142
First, the sale of arms doesn't belong in this argument.	caseymoz	Mar 7	#148
Ergo, It's okay for INNOCENT people to die for YOUR Constitution even if they don't CHOOSE to.	patrice	Mar 7	#173
You might as well say, "oh, so you're a Cub's fan!"	caseymoz	Mar 7	#215
Excellent Point "why does a nice guy insist on holding you at gunpoint?"	GoneFishin	Mar 7	#187
That IS a good question if it's an honest one & doesn't start with the answer as is the usual case	patrice	Mar 7	#200
Kick and Rec! n/t	zappaman	Mar 7	#143
When Democrats don't serve their constituents, they risk the right stealing their voters ...	Scuba	Mar 7	#149
It's all about the money	Andy Stanton	Mar 7	#150
Excuse me-Ron Paul is a megamillionaire who makes $50,000 a speech now.	graham4anything	Mar 7	#151
It's not about the man.	freedom fighter jh	Mar 7	#152
Its funny how so many on DU will FLOCK to this turd because he	JoePhilly	Mar 7	#153
The Paul cult infests every site on the Internet.	Comrade_McKenzie	Mar 7	#175
Nice to see who they are. I am not surprised one bit. nt	DevonRex	Mar 7	#190
I think we should be embarassed by this.	paulbibeau	Mar 7	#154
I do not agree with the administration's position on drones.	mmonk	Mar 7	#155
Yes! nt	paulbibeau	Mar 7	#156
Um, you might wanna check out his actual opinion on drones before you go agreeing with him.	DevonRex	Mar 7	#212
How very droll and insulting...	99Forever	Mar 7	#157
+1	bahrbearian	Mar 7	#166
He's also a woman-hating, woman-abusing pr*ck	ProfessionalLeftist	Mar 7	#158
No drones	Mkap	Mar 7	#160
Rand Paul and his daddy should wear their pointy white hoods to work	workinclasszero	Mar 7	#162
+1. And they call themselves "libertarians"	backscatter712	Mar 7	#177
Yep. The LiberTEAryans branch of that family supporting tax-cuts for the 1% this time.	patrice	Mar 7	#191
But support re-instating Habeus Corpus, right?	grahamhgreen	Mar 7	#167
Judging by the length of this thread and the speciousness of some of the flames...	backscatter712	Mar 7	#169
He poses as libertarian	Idpomattlex	Mar 7	#170
Exactly. The Randroid does not really believe in liberty. If he did, he'd support GLBT rights. n/t	backscatter712	Mar 7	#174
Rand Paul supports "swift drone action" based on a "reasonable suspicion" of an "imminent danger"	ProSense	Mar 7	#171
This thread is certainly not DU's finest hour. nt	Romulox	Mar 7	#172
So we'll put you down as supporting Rand Paul on drones. You'd better check his actual position.	DevonRex	Mar 7	#193
Putting words into people's mouths only to denounce them? It's the lowest form of "discourse". nt	Romulox	Mar 7	#209
Stinky, may I suggest some lube for that dried corncob?	backscatter712	Mar 7	#176
even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while....	bowens43	Mar 7	#179
"He should not be speaking for you."	TommyCelt	Mar 7	#181
I want to address something	timdog44	Mar 7	#182
Thank you, timdog44. It's a difficult position to hold, because I am actually REALLY worried about	patrice	Mar 7	#189
Agreed.	timdog44	Mar 7	#194
Oh, please.	Daemonaquila	Mar 7	#183
"Poking the hornet's nest". Exactly right.	GoCubsGo	Mar 7	#188
Exactly.	Rider3	Mar 7	#185
+100	BklnDem75	Mar 7	#195
Yeah, fuck that guy.	ellie	Mar 7	#199
No thank you	RoccoR5955	Mar 7	#206
the stinkmeister is correct.	spanone	Mar 7	#210
Local KY Poll: Can we blow this up pls?	fuzila	Mar 7	#216
Does this help?	Rhiannon12866	Mar 8	#221
Eeewwww!	polmaven	Mar 7	#219
Not the point. Ideas count, not teams or personalities.	DirkGently	Mar 7	#220

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.