Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,199 posts)

14. It would be a huge savings in rocket fuel

Sat Mar 2, 2013, 02:58 PM

Mar 2013

The amount of hot air present could not only lift the rocket but propel it out of the atmosphere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In 5 years, we're going to send two people to Mars. [View all] bananas Feb 2013 OP

Or will the man end up on Mars...and the woman on Venus? pinboy3niner Feb 2013 #1

I've seen a lot of these private space ventures come and go LongTomH Feb 2013 #2

This isn't a start-up venture, it's a philanthropic venture bananas Mar 2013 #9

Well, I nominate Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.... n/t Still Sensible Feb 2013 #3

In nominate Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh SummerSnow Feb 2013 #4

It would be a huge savings in rocket fuel LadyHawkAZ Mar 2013 #14

This is real and doable Neurotica Feb 2013 #5

Are Carnival Cruises far behind? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2013 #10

The money would be much better spent Shankapotomus Mar 2013 #11

Biospheres on Mars have a lot of advantages bananas Mar 2013 #12

I have to agree Shankapotomus Mar 2013 #13

Maybe not a good idea just yet. Separation Mar 2013 #15

Even if it doesn't impact, it could still take out the orbiters bananas Mar 2013 #20

I want to pick which two Spirochete Mar 2013 #16

I nominate the Kochroach Bros. meow2u3 Mar 2013 #17

I rather doubt it. The round trip is 70+ weeks, and life support struggle4progress Mar 2013 #18

"President Kennedy, when will we put a man on the moon?" cherokeeprogressive Mar 2013 #19