Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Too much? [View all]Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)22. Agreed.
The truth is sometimes presented in scathingly caustic terms - but it IS the truth, nonetheless.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Its what he was hired for afterall by the biggest bullshitters in gov. office-the Bush family
MichiganVote
Feb 2013
#2
True, but Thomas has expressed his opinion the the Act is unconstitutional. /nt
dorkulon
Feb 2013
#5
Is that like counting some of the votes in Florida? or like being sort of pregnant?
robinlynne
Feb 2013
#19
Not that I want to agree with him but the voting rights act may well be unconstitutional.
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#21
I think th burden should be on the party who believes the act is unconstitutional.
Hassin Bin Sober
Feb 2013
#26
It appears that your are using the KKK as a shield in order to call Thomas "boy".
Luminous Animal
Feb 2013
#24
The clear intent of the OP was to show the KKK calling Thomas, "boy", not the poster. nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#33
I object to the boy part - and I think the boy part is why it was posted here.
Democracyinkind
Feb 2013
#25
Clarence Thomas is more a lapdog of Monsanto than the KKK. He's an ex-Monsanto attorney
Fire Walk With Me
Feb 2013
#30