Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

11. That's pretty much the dissent in Lochner v New York

Reply to cthulu2016 (Reply #10)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 09:19 PM

Feb 2013

At the end of the day, the only functional definition of "improper substitution of legislative judgment" is "the court didn't agree with me".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scalia's bold new view of the Supreme Court [View all] cthulu2016 Feb 2013 OP

That interpolated means they can at any time strike down or interpret the 2nd. graham4anything Feb 2013 #1

Or Citizen's United thelordofhell Feb 2013 #2

K&R! patrice Feb 2013 #4

Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2013 #3

The Right doesn't understand the difference between judicial activism hedgehog Feb 2013 #5

Members of Congress are representatives of the people octoberlib Feb 2013 #6

So I Agree With You About This Current Issue. BUT... dballance Feb 2013 #7

That's not the rationale for disagreeing with Scalia pinboy3niner Feb 2013 #8

DOMA was passed by Congress too jberryhill Feb 2013 #9

We are (kind of obviously) talking about *absent Constitutional issue* cthulu2016 Feb 2013 #10

That's pretty much the dissent in Lochner v New York jberryhill Feb 2013 #11

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scalia's bold new view of...»Reply #11