Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
21. Two words: "Carrying capacity".
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 09:40 PM
Feb 2013

That's a really BAD idea and honestly there should be about half as many people on the planet as there actually are.

shameless kick. n/t antigone382 Feb 2013 #1
Hi, I'm an RN (female) and I'd like to address a couple of points in your post Heddi Feb 2013 #2
Yes, the article mentions that there are important educational distinctions between the two. antigone382 Feb 2013 #3
if the per hour rates are the same roxy1234 Feb 2013 #4
The point is that women face disproportionate barriers. antigone382 Feb 2013 #6
Well the women I work with who are CNA's Heddi Feb 2013 #5
Those are very interesting insights into the world of nursing. antigone382 Feb 2013 #7
A long term fix to our economy... valiberal26 Feb 2013 #8
As an environmentalist, I don't necessarily agree with that. antigone382 Feb 2013 #9
And then when those children grow up, they would also need to have 6 or 7 kids too? How many people uppityperson Feb 2013 #10
Like I said, in an ideal world... valiberal26 Feb 2013 #11
Overpoulation issues aside, I have no desire to subsidize large families. Peter cotton Feb 2013 #12
It is unfortunate to me that the discussion of compensating women for reproduction... antigone382 Feb 2013 #13
That was my point actually. valiberal26 Feb 2013 #17
I don't know that we need to encourage it to the point of six children per family. antigone382 Feb 2013 #18
We already subsidize breeding through the tax code customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #27
ZPG=zero population growth? antigone382 Feb 2013 #31
You are correct customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #33
I believe this conversation is about Texasgal Feb 2013 #16
Post #8 advocated having the government encourage women to have half a dozen children or more. Peter cotton Feb 2013 #23
No not clear Texasgal Feb 2013 #26
Interesting question, but not one I addressed. Peter cotton Feb 2013 #28
The problem I may have is that Texasgal Feb 2013 #29
Why should one stay on topic for the entirety of a thread? Peter cotton Feb 2013 #30
Or we could look at immigration laws gollygee Feb 2013 #14
What! The last thing we need is more overbreeding. smirkymonkey Feb 2013 #15
Long term fix... valiberal26 Feb 2013 #19
Two words: "Carrying capacity". Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #21
Only if your model has unlimited resources and opportunity TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #24
I've read your OP and your responses. I believe I understand your points. maggiesfarmer Feb 2013 #20
Interesting points, thanks! I think that general time off for family issues should be compensated. antigone382 Feb 2013 #22
thanks for picking up the humble brag about my daughter, maggiesfarmer Feb 2013 #25
It sounds like you have a good reason to be proud. antigone382 Feb 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Women should NOT be econo...»Reply #21