Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
19. The VTOL version is a big part of the programs troubles
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 01:30 PM
Feb 2013

Drop the VTOL and simplify the other versions.

So, what should replace the F-35? [View all] bobclark86 Feb 2013 OP
How about the F15 for interception and the F16 for air-to-air? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2013 #1
The Navy carrier fleet could get by with F-18s for a few more decades...eom Kolesar Feb 2013 #3
My mom was at NAS Pensacola in '74... bobclark86 Feb 2013 #13
We have C-130's going overhead on a regular basis. They still work just fine. Gorp Feb 2013 #42
Probably woudn't fare well against Chinese and Russian stealth jets. OceanEcosystem Feb 2013 #77
We won't be having dogfights with the Chinese or Russians DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2013 #78
Conservatives claim that leaving the money with the public creates more growth and jobs Kolesar Feb 2013 #2
Ooh! bobclark86 Feb 2013 #15
We lacked translators, not armaments, to stop the 9/11 terror attack Kolesar Feb 2013 #32
Drones are replacing manned aircraft pretty rapidly FarCenter Feb 2013 #4
Nothing. The JSF is not the problem, it is a symptom. Few people can really grasp just how Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #5
Try again, the Russians are kicking our asses sir pball Feb 2013 #11
I'd agree accept that the F-22 and F-35 are both over-priced pieces of shit. Gorp Feb 2013 #44
From the get-go maybe sir pball Feb 2013 #64
Buying overpriced hardware built by incompetent numbnuts won't help fix that problem. bemildred Feb 2013 #51
If you can get out of the absurd mindset that has been fostered, you would also consider Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #52
I never said anything about Russian aggression. sir pball Feb 2013 #65
I get the corporate welfare bit... bobclark86 Feb 2013 #16
That's where changing our minds comes in. We are stuck in a cycle of Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #53
The next gen of air superiority and ground attack will be remotely piloted vehicles. leveymg Feb 2013 #6
+1 Blue_Tires Feb 2013 #7
The F-35 is obsolete, inferior, unsurvivable junk. Stop throwing money at it. leveymg Feb 2013 #9
Publicly funded, universal health care. n/t ronnie624 Feb 2013 #8
The F-35 is likely to be America's last manned fighter. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #10
Yes and no sir pball Feb 2013 #38
Actually, human lag time is worse. Pilots take longer than automonous drones in decision-making Ikonoklast Feb 2013 #56
No drone can remotely handle the Su-30 and Mig-29 derivatives FogerRox Feb 2013 #39
How would the Su-30 and Mig-29 do against the Patriot missile -- which is an autonomous drone? FarCenter Feb 2013 #61
The patriot is not a drone. A drone is a weapons platform, not a weapon. A patriot is a weapon. nt stevenleser Feb 2013 #74
A drone is any unmanned vehicle under its own guidance and optionally remote guidance FarCenter Feb 2013 #76
A drone could have advantages. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #79
I disagree. Even with the rapid communication links we have now, a pilot is quicker. Gorp Feb 2013 #46
The drones will rapidly become autonomous -- there is no need for a pilot on the ground FarCenter Feb 2013 #55
That's true, but autonomous drones have no sense of ethics. Gorp Feb 2013 #57
It'd have whatever ethical precepts are programmed into it. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #80
That's the point. A pilot knows when firing is ethically wrong. Gorp Feb 2013 #81
I dont know how rapidly we will be able to build the following AI into a drone... stevenleser Feb 2013 #58
The problems are soluble or irrelevant FarCenter Feb 2013 #60
You gloss right over the complexities...starting with IFF. stevenleser Feb 2013 #66
To intercept airliners and general aviation aircraft doesn't require an F-35 FarCenter Feb 2013 #69
And that is easier said than done in terms of identifying what is an enemy target at that range. stevenleser Feb 2013 #71
Yeeeah, you're oversimplifying the hell out of things Posteritatis Feb 2013 #72
That's a good point. Even in chess there are a limited amount of possible moves. stevenleser Feb 2013 #73
And that's before the subjectives like rules of engagement and other shades of gray Posteritatis Feb 2013 #75
SkyNet is self-aware jpak Feb 2013 #68
Yeah, that is another reason not to implement artificially intelligent killing machines... stevenleser Feb 2013 #70
If we have to keep it within the defense/MIC spending, kentauros Feb 2013 #12
Doesn't have to stay Pentagon... bobclark86 Feb 2013 #14
Okay, and I like your idea of a "CIC" kentauros Feb 2013 #17
Your solar-antenna would work at night in my quite-cloudy town Kolesar Feb 2013 #21
One thing that I sincerely hope would be done, kentauros Feb 2013 #23
Reforestation would sequester the CO2 as would algae growth from dumping iron powder into the sea Kolesar Feb 2013 #25
I have read about the use of iron powder, and am still iffy on doing that. kentauros Feb 2013 #28
Except for the VTOL version the rest should be dropped The Second Stone Feb 2013 #18
The VTOL version is a big part of the programs troubles FarCenter Feb 2013 #19
then just drop them all The Second Stone Feb 2013 #22
Yes, it is probably too late and too costly to salvage the Air Force and Navy versions FarCenter Feb 2013 #24
Simple. 99Forever Feb 2013 #20
Peace, and paintable weatherproofing caulk! Kolesar Feb 2013 #26
I'm not exactly sure how to take your response. 99Forever Feb 2013 #31
F-22 midwest irish Feb 2013 #27
We're *still building* LCACs, and you expect the F-35 to be scrapped? Recursion Feb 2013 #29
Simple solution: fuck war. Earth_First Feb 2013 #30
Not another Jet n2doc Feb 2013 #33
Well said, but with one minor correction. For the cost of the F-35, it would be WAY more than 140K. Gorp Feb 2013 #47
As an act of patriotism I'll offer my '93 Toyota pickup and put on fresh duct tape. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #34
Butter. n/t Orsino Feb 2013 #35
here's a diagram bigtree Feb 2013 #36
The G-36 of course. nt guardian Feb 2013 #37
schools and teachers rurallib Feb 2013 #40
More F-15s. They're proven, highly effective, reliable, and relatively inexpensive. Gorp Feb 2013 #41
The Viper MK II of course Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #43
"Use the Force, Luke." Gorp Feb 2013 #48
A School Lunch Program eom Taverner Feb 2013 #45
The YF-23 should have been built and then modified to meet the joint criteria. Tikki Feb 2013 #49
Nothing. nt bemildred Feb 2013 #50
not surprising... janlyn Feb 2013 #54
They should conduct a War Game between the F-35 and the Patriot missile FarCenter Feb 2013 #59
I don't see why we don't start the space program again instead of letting private enterprises do it? Cleita Feb 2013 #62
Republicans. We should threaten to offload them onto other countries. winter is coming Feb 2013 #63
I'll make the Pentagon an offer they can't refuse ... lpbk2713 Feb 2013 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, what should replace t...»Reply #19