Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
14. The EU's Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:46 AM
Feb 2013

The US was already lethally behind the EU in protecting citizens/residents from exposure to toxic substances. Now we add radioactive materials to our products? What is this? A new Obama anti-science policy? You don't recycle radioactive!

The Obama administration is moving in the opposite direction, and against scientific knowledge in regard to protecting citizens from exposure to hazardous materials! Absolutely inexcusable and unacceptable!

While taking a train in Ireland about 6 years ago, I sat next to an American woman who was a computer salesperson assigned to the UK. She explained to me that computers and other equipment her company sold had to meet higher safety standards in all developed countries, except the US, in regard to dangerous components. I am NOT relying on a single source of information. Below are chapter and verse links to data backing up what she told me.

http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/air_pollution/l28035_en.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_of_Hazardous_Substances_Directive
The EU's restriction of hazardous substances (ROHS) is often referred to as the lead-free directive, but it restricts the use of the following six substances:

Lead (Pb)
Mercury (Hg)
Cadmium (Cd)
Hexavalent chromium (Cr6+)
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB)
Polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE)

The directive applies to equipment as defined by a section of the WEEE directive. The following numeric categories apply:

Large household appliances.
Small household appliances.
IT & Telecommunications equipment
Consumer equipment.
Lighting equipment—including light bulbs.
Electronic and electrical tools.
Toys, leisure, and sports equipment.
Medical devices (exemption removed in July, 2011)
Monitoring and control instruments (exemption removed in July, 2011)
Automatic dispensers.
Semiconductor devices

RoHS restricted substances have been used in a broad array of consumer electronics products. Examples of leaded components include:

paints and pigments
PVC (vinyl) cables as a stabilizer (e.g., power cords, USB cables)
solders
printed circuit board finishes, leads, internal and external interconnects
glass in television and photographic products (e.g., CRT television screens and camera lenses)
metal parts
lamps and bulbs
batteries
Hazardous materials and the high-tech trash problem

RoHS and other efforts to reduce hazardous materials in electronics are motivated in part to address the global issue of consumer electronics waste. As newer technology arrives at an ever increasing rate, consumers are discarding their obsolete products sooner than ever. This waste ends up in landfills and in countries like China to be "recycled."http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es071873x

"In the fashion-conscious mobile market, 98 million U.S. cell phones took their last call in 2005. All told, the EPA estimates that in the U.S. that year, between 1.5 and 1.9 million tons of computers, TVs, VCRs, monitors, cell phones, and other equipment were discarded. If all sources of electronic waste are tallied, it could total 50 million tons a year worldwide, according to the UN Environment Programme."
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/01/high-tech-trash/carroll-text

American electronics sent offshore to countries like Ghana in West Africa under the guise of recycling may be doing more harm than good. Not only are adult and child workers in these jobs being poisoned by heavy metals, but these metals are returning to the U.S. "The U.S. right now is shipping large quantities of leaded materials to China, and China is the world's major manufacturing center," Dr. Jeffrey Weidenhamer says, a chemistry professor at Ashland University in Ohio. "It's not all that surprising things are coming full circle and now we're getting contaminated products back."[11][12]http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9919304-54.html?tag=nefd.lede
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/15/science/earth/15obrecy.html?ref=technology

Now we can add radioactive poison to all the other hazardous materials we inflict upon our own citizens and ship to 3rd world countries! A new version of American Exceptionalism!

What a country newfie11 Feb 2013 #1
Not To Worry.... global1 Feb 2013 #3
Oh yeah TG. Ng newfie11 Feb 2013 #21
What could possibly go wrong? TDale313 Feb 2013 #2
asshole chu's parting gift triplepoint Feb 2013 #4
Serves us right--We debated and debated where to put this garbage, and couldn't arrive at consensus… Journeyman Feb 2013 #5
Nice, way to blame the future victims. MadHound Feb 2013 #7
But wait....... Rain Mcloud Feb 2013 #8
We elected Obama to block this kind of crap, not enable it! Divernan Feb 2013 #9
Time to be outraged - yet again! colorado_ufo Feb 2013 #6
Almost everything in nature is radioactive to some level quaker bill Feb 2013 #10
well then let's add it to our cereal leftyohiolib Feb 2013 #15
Your cereal is radioactive already, get used to it - in fact you already are. quaker bill Feb 2013 #30
Cobalt 60 and cesium 137 newfie11 Feb 2013 #22
True, but are these proposed for re-use as anything other than a radiation source? quaker bill Feb 2013 #29
Sure there is radiation AND then there is RADIATION newfie11 Feb 2013 #32
We do our best to educate Quaker Bill - Divernan Feb 2013 #42
Neither one of these are anything I want near me. quaker bill Feb 2013 #44
That would make some great stuff to Hubert Flottz Feb 2013 #11
So "they" get to put this timdog44 Feb 2013 #12
Worked so well on the Navajo Reservation. Downwinder Feb 2013 #13
Yep I am a downwinders too newfie11 Feb 2013 #23
Kerr McGee got the Uranium formercia Feb 2013 #33
They got all of that nice construction material Downwinder Feb 2013 #38
The EU's Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive. Divernan Feb 2013 #14
Holy cow Batman, excellent comment FogerRox Feb 2013 #17
Thanks for taking the time to read through it. Divernan Feb 2013 #19
Thanks for this post, Divernan. It's an important read to go along with OP.. KoKo Feb 2013 #35
Nuclear Risks at Bed, Bath & Beyond Show Dangers of Scrap KoKo Feb 2013 #36
Bed,BathTissue boxes tainted with melted cobalt-60 used in medical instruments! Divernan Feb 2013 #41
They have been wanting to reuse the carbon in radiation plants for years, putting them Baitball Blogger Feb 2013 #16
also in the concrete and paving materials that we build with ThomThom Feb 2013 #18
WTF IS GOING ON WITH THIS COUNTRY?! JaneyVee Feb 2013 #20
I say this many times a day newfie11 Feb 2013 #24
Me, too. Frankly, I'm glad I'm old. I weep for my grandson. nt Nay Feb 2013 #27
I know the feeling newfie11 Feb 2013 #34
We used to have a Democratic Party that stood in opposition to corporatist, predatory policies. woo me with science Feb 2013 #40
I think we thought we did...and it ended with Carter...so... KoKo Feb 2013 #47
I do believe it's time to buy a Geiger Counter. nt Ilsa Feb 2013 #25
Not so easy to detect rads RobertEarl Feb 2013 #39
I just FB'd to my kids that this is what I want for Mother's Day Divernan Feb 2013 #43
Because it worked out so well before? HooptieWagon Feb 2013 #26
Sadly I thought you were joking in the header message... Jasana Feb 2013 #28
Which Obama crony will get even richer off of this? forestpath Feb 2013 #31
Thousands of consumer products found to contain low levels of radiation KoKo Feb 2013 #37
K&R...it's a good discussion from OP and the Rest of it.."in our times." KoKo Feb 2013 #45
WTF?? Unfreakinbelievable!! DearHeart Feb 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Energy Dept announces pla...»Reply #14