Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)

10. On the last post, you said he was the key to the US operation led of course by OBL

Reply to leveymg (Reply #9)

Sat Feb 23, 2013, 11:36 AM

Feb 2013

therefore, had they gone after the 20 plus him, they would all have been killed in 2000 or 2001
so he would still be dead.

dead is dead.

one can't have it both ways.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Zero Dark Thirty is total propaganda [View all] noise Feb 2013 OP

I know a lot of Europeans have been very unimpressed with it Warpy Feb 2013 #1

CIA hero narratives are well received by US journalists noise Feb 2013 #2

It does, but any movie that told the truth Warpy Feb 2013 #4

Unless they had specific info on OBL, how would it have stopped it? graham4anything Feb 2013 #3

An honest movie noise Feb 2013 #5

OBL had others ? dipsydoodle Feb 2013 #6

The principal hijackers all met together on several occasions. There was an opportunity to roll-up leveymg Feb 2013 #7

That's why it's great they droned him. graham4anything Feb 2013 #8

And, he can no longer talk about his apparent role as a CIA/Saudi double-agent. leveymg Feb 2013 #9

On the last post, you said he was the key to the US operation led of course by OBL graham4anything Feb 2013 #10

OBL hasn't led what we call al-Qaeda for many years. leveymg Feb 2013 #11

AAK would have been dead then, instead of by drone.(Probably by bunker bomb). graham4anything Feb 2013 #12

Funny thing, SomethingFishy Feb 2013 #13

Yeah, I agree with what I said 100%. graham4anything Feb 2013 #14

No, I don't get someone SomethingFishy Feb 2013 #15

But who said what you said I said? graham4anything Feb 2013 #16

I knew it would be. It's the same reason I refused to see "Act of Valor." white_wolf Feb 2013 #17

It was just a movie. 99Forever Feb 2013 #18

I didn't see it noise Feb 2013 #19

Oh the irony. 99Forever Feb 2013 #24

So what if it isn't a documentary? It still contains a message. white_wolf Feb 2013 #23

Very peculiar comments considering the Guy Fawkes mask n/t Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2013 #27

You mean the mask that Occupy Wall Street used and I'm using a show of support for them? white_wolf Feb 2013 #29

Actually you are 100% wrong here. graham4anything Feb 2013 #28

Indeed. PM Martin Feb 2013 #20

The movie was entirely about the chase for OBL after 9-11 Godhumor Feb 2013 #21

The context of the movie is distorted noise Feb 2013 #22

And as for the movie generally.. sendero Feb 2013 #26

Ah bullshit... sendero Feb 2013 #25

Based on what? noise Feb 2013 #30

And this would differentiate it from other war-genre movies how? WinkyDink Feb 2013 #31

Anyone remember this? green for victory Feb 2013 #32