Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
16. Why do I bother reading these posts?
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 11:22 AM
Feb 2013

What makes me think they will ever be any better than any of the others?

Why do I keep doing this?

When did I stop beating my wife?

Where am I?

Huh? Regarding Iraq, Hillary voted for the invasion. TheDebbieDee Feb 2013 #1
I never said the two views were the same on Iraq. I know the difference. graham4anything Feb 2013 #2
You're in denial about Hillary's long legacy as a lead advocate of regime change. Warren doesn't leveymg Feb 2013 #5
You have no evidence of the reverse. graham4anything Feb 2013 #12
Actually, Warren condemned the Iraq War. leveymg Feb 2013 #14
see graham4anything Feb 2013 #15
Ok. We can agree on some of this. But, foreign policy record matters, anyway. A lot. leveymg Feb 2013 #22
John V. Lindsay was one of the greatest liberals of all time. True populist. graham4anything Feb 2013 #24
John Lindsay and Jacob Javits wouldn't recognize today's GOP, which has become Wallace Democrats leveymg Feb 2013 #27
Warren had zero political record before she ran for the Senate. Beacool Feb 2013 #30
Hillary did not vote for "the invasion". DURHAM D Feb 2013 #3
When Bush decided to invade she supported his decision over weapon inspectors who reported blm Feb 2013 #28
Obama gave a speech about it, didn't do much more. Beacool Feb 2013 #29
There's that old chestnut again. AtomicKitten Feb 2013 #33
Why do people fabricate strawman arguments in GD? bluedigger Feb 2013 #4
Actually, the opposite graham4anything Feb 2013 #8
Of course neither Clinton nor Obama 'gave up their current job' to run for President. Both remained Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #19
2016 is not 2008 which was a revolution. 2016 is for a continuation graham4anything Feb 2013 #21
Iraq invasion which is a hot topic this week, was supported by Hillary's vote while Obama said Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #6
Same trick Dean pulled: get angry on TV, and progressives fall for you Recursion Feb 2013 #7
Yup. and Dean was Dukakissed. graham4anything Feb 2013 #10
LOLOLOLOLOL! MadHound Feb 2013 #9
Disagree. All 3 are on the same page.except for a wedge or two,which everyone has. graham4anything Feb 2013 #11
LBJ is hard to describe. Jennicut Feb 2013 #23
It is more of a difference in style rather than policy Freddie Stubbs Feb 2013 #13
Why do I bother reading these posts? WilliamPitt Feb 2013 #16
HRC kept her head down early on during her senate time SoCalDem Feb 2013 #17
no, you got that all wrong graham4anything Feb 2013 #18
Hillary is playing it safe for a presidential run, Liz Warren is right where she wants to be. reformist2 Feb 2013 #20
Personally i hope Hillary doesn't get involved in any wedge issue from now til then. graham4anything Feb 2013 #26
Message auto-removed Kevski Feb 2013 #25
Or Rahm Emanuel's? Or Andrew Cuomo's? (nt) Nye Bevan Feb 2013 #31
They are both strong and wonderful women to have on our side. NCTraveler Feb 2013 #32
In the best of both worlds we may have both. Beacool Feb 2013 #34
Who are these "people of which you speak? stlsaxman Feb 2013 #35
As much as I dislike her foreign policy, Hilary has always backed unions Taverner Feb 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do people think Eliza...»Reply #16