General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Hassin Bin Sober
(26,243 posts)Nudity is fine. But the law usually draws a line at when the nudity was done for sexual arousal/gratification.
I'll agree far too many people are charged with sex crimes for innocent displays of their naughty bits - i.e. peeing in the woods, or the guy who was arrested for walking around nude in his OWN house where some nosy body could see ... etc.
But this WAS done for sexual arousal and gratification.
The stripper is probably guilty of statutory rape and the mother endangerment because she arranged the situation that lead to said rape. The mother put the child in the situation. That's the endangerment.
I can't help but think you would view this differently if it was a thirty year old man rubbing his balls on a 14-15-16 year old girl's head and face.