Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Upton

(9,709 posts)
86. To a 16 year old boy..
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 11:04 AM
Feb 2013

a woman's genitals up close is indeed a "dream come true"...

Link? nt Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #1
Not familiar with the details here, but if the genders were reversed, closeupready Feb 2013 #2
A nude anything alone shouldn't be considered endangering treestar Feb 2013 #3
None in the US should be exposed to Sex or Nudity until over THIRTY (at least)!!! RKP5637 Feb 2013 #57
And then only in the context of marriage, or enhanced interrogation, kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #126
Until at least thirty? Dpm12 Feb 2013 #139
Did you see the Sarcasm? RKP5637 Feb 2013 #145
More like especially after 30 Major Nikon Feb 2013 #206
The OP is misleading...this was a lot more than mere nudity. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #76
C'mon, strippers are about a little more than nudity. Marr Feb 2013 #197
Do you know any 16 yr olds that haven't figured out how to get better off the internet for free? Major Nikon Feb 2013 #216
At what age can it be handled? treestar Feb 2013 #312
13% of teens have had sex by age 15. young people have sex for the first time at about age 17, seabeyond Feb 2013 #321
This was not the same as a naturist family's trip to a nude beach. Bucky Feb 2013 #198
strippers, with other peoples children "14, 15 and 16 year old child" seabeyond Feb 2013 #4
I wish I knew the code they were being charged under el_bryanto Feb 2013 #8
my child goes to an adults house and served booze (cause the parent wants to be cool) seabeyond Feb 2013 #10
I'd be surprised if anybody defended the mom's actions - el_bryanto Feb 2013 #16
Serving a kid alcohol would be "endangering" the child. Atman Feb 2013 #21
It depends on what the law actually says. We do have laws around statutory rape in some places el_bryanto Feb 2013 #24
"Is a 14-15 year old prepared emotionally..." Atman Feb 2013 #56
and i was raised in calif, on a swim team and we were in essence naked all the time. seabeyond Feb 2013 #59
"...as much as you want to pretend." Atman Feb 2013 #62
you compare it to teenage years playing on the beach, to drawing nudes, to merely seeing boobies... seabeyond Feb 2013 #63
You bore me. Atman Feb 2013 #67
you say all kinds of shit thru out the thread and then pretend you didnt. ya. a bore. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #70
No, I've been very consistent, as have you. Atman Feb 2013 #74
"first one to claim all men are evil pigs". "consistently conflated and twisted my words" seabeyond Feb 2013 #78
Why are you avoiding the very clear statement I have made regarding the CRIME? msanthrope Feb 2013 #83
What does the statute say? or do you have the code? el_bryanto Feb 2013 #106
I'd check out NY Penal sections 230 and 260. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #115
That's is an over the top response. el_bryanto Feb 2013 #103
It's possible she has a certain "style" Atman Feb 2013 #112
so i use your words. you make stuff up. and you call me out. what a fuckin' hoot. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #113
Well that's nonsensical logic right there el_bryanto Feb 2013 #138
What then makes it bad parenting...? LanternWaste Feb 2013 #162
First, this wasn't just nudity as you seem to admit with your next accusation against Sea... DevonRex Feb 2013 #349
Actually, I have the same question Scootaloo Feb 2013 #353
It probably has something to do with the state laws susanr516 Feb 2013 #361
Oh, now bathing suits make one "essentially naked"? Well, it is the QUALIFIER that counts here. WinkyDink Feb 2013 #77
if you saw the speedos of the 70' and 80's, when wet, or hell, even dry, pretty much. seabeyond Feb 2013 #82
I'm actually with Seabeyond on this... Atman Feb 2013 #85
I had to borrow a Speedo to go to the pool in 8th grade and the guy who loaned it to me... Gorp Feb 2013 #301
You would have to look at the law to determine harm or endangerment el_bryanto Feb 2013 #101
It's probably statutory rape on the part of the stripper. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2013 #108
One of the most sane posts yet. Atman Feb 2013 #116
I think it falls under "informed consent" laws R B Garr Feb 2013 #132
18 is the official age for sex? Not in most states. cali Feb 2013 #150
the age of consent is 16 in most states hfojvt Feb 2013 #233
Looks like 17 in NY. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2013 #323
How is it statutory rape if sex wasn't involved? Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2013 #262
Statutory rape is a catch-all as I am using it here. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2013 #319
I meant to say, "I'm not taking sides" ... Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2013 #324
I saw that and figured as much. LOL Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2013 #326
There was at least one 13 year old at this party. The arrest took place in that context. pnwmom Feb 2013 #351
like not all men want to go to strip bars, not all boys want to have a stripper rub her crotch in seabeyond Feb 2013 #32
I have two sons. I don't care what ALL men want. Atman Feb 2013 #60
Sex crimes against minors do not involve an element of consent, generally, so the issue of 'force' msanthrope Feb 2013 #130
Young people will do a lot of things amongst their peers MadrasT Feb 2013 #236
Reverse genders. WinkyDink Feb 2013 #75
How about a 14 year old? cali Feb 2013 #146
I suspect the child endangerment charges are placeholders. msanthrope Feb 2013 #43
B.I.N.G.O. GaYellowDawg Feb 2013 #183
Didn't they used to call that 'contributing to the delinquincy of a minor'? Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2013 #15
No, lots of other states have that, or "corruption of minors" sir pball Feb 2013 #133
Seems to me more "corruption of minors" sir pball Feb 2013 #125
I heard some pundit guffawing that he could not believe that ANY 16 year old American boy Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #5
The question was, is in "endangerment?" Atman Feb 2013 #7
Wow. Way to fully miss the entire point. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #18
I didn't miss the point. Atman Feb 2013 #25
Being gay is not a 'lifestyle'. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #65
"Lifestyle" Atman Feb 2013 #93
Dressing in drag and being gay are not the same things. It is not the case that outgoing gay Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #154
Thank you for these posts. redqueen Feb 2013 #165
We have no argument here. Atman Feb 2013 #172
Wow. What you are doing is defining your cross dressing friend as having a gay 'lifestyle' while Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #239
Thank you for sticking with this conversation. DevonRex Feb 2013 #345
When words impede communication, why use them? LiberalAndProud Feb 2013 #373
There is so much ignorance in this post I don't know where to begin. yardwork Feb 2013 #171
How the hell do you know? Atman Feb 2013 #181
IT'S AN ISSUE WITH ME BECAUSE I AM GAY yardwork Feb 2013 #184
I thought I was on ignore? Atman Feb 2013 #229
So, being gay is a lifestyle to you obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #192
So you're just deliberately ignoring what I posted? Atman Feb 2013 #242
Wow, you just ooze hetero privilege. Yuck. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #170
WTF has happened to you all of a sudden? You are behaving as if you have had some sort of major stevenleser Feb 2013 #368
^^^^^^^^What he said!!!^^^^^^^ Squinch Feb 2013 #377
16 year olds cant see a stripper but they CAN get pregnant and decide wether or no to have an leftyohiolib Feb 2013 #23
It may involve more than the mere sight boobies. aikoaiko Feb 2013 #6
Is that an actual picture from the party? Atman Feb 2013 #9
According to the link, yes, it is from the party aikoaiko Feb 2013 #19
It looks to me like that 16 yo has quite the receding hairline MindPilot Feb 2013 #30
It's the internet...it must be true Atman Feb 2013 #47
It is from the party. They performed lap dances on several minors. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #205
Response from the 16 year old boys out there... WCGreen Feb 2013 #14
The state has an interest in very bad parenting. Brickbat Feb 2013 #11
Would you care if your 14yr old daughter was at a party with male strippers? jmg257 Feb 2013 #12
Of course I would care. Atman Feb 2013 #17
If you don't want your daughter seeing strippers then this OP is bullshit deluxe Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #27
Who invented "18" Atman Feb 2013 #45
Who invented "18?" Atman, I've had criminal clients ask me the same question. msanthrope Feb 2013 #58
Your point being? Atman Feb 2013 #64
Yes. It is the law. It is what matters. People who don't get that simple concept tend to be my msanthrope Feb 2013 #73
"How do you not get that..." Atman Feb 2013 #81
Oh, I read all your posts--including #60, where you note that no minor was 'forced'--as if that's an msanthrope Feb 2013 #88
But parents sign off to send their "kids" to war blueamy66 Feb 2013 #166
Really? 16 year olds go off to war in this country? And I thought you liked lawsuits? msanthrope Feb 2013 #199
Get a life. blueamy66 Feb 2013 #213
+1000 Atman Feb 2013 #220
If you find my memory inconvenient, perhaps you should refrain from posting to me. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #227
Your memory isn't the problem blueamy66 Feb 2013 #231
I have a memory palace. DU has a room. Your Mother's Day thread was one for the ages. msanthrope Feb 2013 #247
17 year olds... actslikeacarrot Feb 2013 #375
They used to. Atman Feb 2013 #219
Or see a naked woman blueamy66 Feb 2013 #234
Do you have an example from this century? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #265
Do you have anything relevant to post other than "it's the law?" Atman Feb 2013 #322
"skanky snatch" Marrah_G Feb 2013 #66
Ridiculous Atman Feb 2013 #100
right. it is a deragatory and demeaning comment made toward the stripper to show the disrespect seabeyond Feb 2013 #105
ALL WOMEN MUST BE ON A PEDASTAL, so says Seabeyond Atman Feb 2013 #118
once again, who is making stuff up? did i say that? no. and you did not address seabeyond Feb 2013 #119
Seabeyond is right, and your strawman is just obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #178
Precisely--a thing to be used, and then despised. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #155
not all men choose to live in this hypocrisy, but the men that do insist all men feel as they do. seabeyond Feb 2013 #158
Do you know this woman? gollygee Feb 2013 #110
Fair enough. Atman Feb 2013 #120
If he used that term, then yes obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #179
Nonsense. Atman Feb 2013 #182
Marrah is 100% right obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #176
Excellent question !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RKP5637 Feb 2013 #72
Apparently not. Atman Feb 2013 #104
SO you have no problem with an adult having sex with a 13yr old? jmg257 Feb 2013 #121
please keep away from mine. seabeyond Feb 2013 #123
You ain't shitting - down right scary. 'Nothing is inappropriate, it's jmg257 Feb 2013 #127
Hope you're not including me in that ... my post about the 13 yr old marriage RKP5637 Feb 2013 #204
Strawman bullshit Atman Feb 2013 #136
Yep-just marriage to 'females' at around 13 or so. I assume they'll be celibate...for some reason. jmg257 Feb 2013 #144
Nope, didn't say that at all, I'm just posting what some state laws were. And RKP5637 Feb 2013 #137
Ahh - I see now. Thanks for clearing that up! nt jmg257 Feb 2013 #148
BTW...WTF is "female marriage"?? And why is it perfectly fine at age 13??? jmg257 Feb 2013 #134
How in the world did you read into this that I was for it? I'm pointing out the inconsistency in RKP5637 Feb 2013 #142
Maybe it was the way the post was written, where you 1)question 18, and jmg257 Feb 2013 #147
Yep, it could be confusing as written. I'll leave it as is for now. Thanks for getting back to me! RKP5637 Feb 2013 #151
Apologies. Cheers! nt jmg257 Feb 2013 #156
DO you think a man who has sex with a girl of 15 should be charged with statutory rape? jmg257 Feb 2013 #117
Please self-delete this post and delete the derogatory, sexist term that you used. yardwork Feb 2013 #159
So, you think "skanky snatch" is acceptable language? obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #173
Sure - but just when referring to it being thrust in a 16yr old boy's face! jmg257 Feb 2013 #185
wrong. the hunks junk is not ok because boys and girls are different. not ok for the girl and the seabeyond Feb 2013 #189
Quite. Boys WILL be boys ya know! Let them be degraded, and degrade. jmg257 Feb 2013 #200
Genders reversed zaireeka Feb 2013 #202
Nice. Another parent trying to be cool, at her kid's expense. jmg257 Feb 2013 #215
To answer your question quite directly ... Laelth Feb 2013 #174
What does 18 have to do with anything I said? Nothing. Why not speak to what I really said? Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #217
"Skanky snatch" - Wow. myrna minx Feb 2013 #260
+100 n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #243
"there are differences between boys and girls" that is so fuckin' lame. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #40
I would expect nothing less from you, Sea. Atman Feb 2013 #48
backatcha... nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #50
There are major differences between boys and girls. Laelth Feb 2013 #191
prove it. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #194
Smile. Laelth Feb 2013 #208
figured. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #209
Those moral and ethical difference are merely observers holding two equals do unequal standards LanternWaste Feb 2013 #180
The Mom decided it would be OK for everyone there. Your daughter jmg257 Feb 2013 #193
If the mother is 33, and the boy just turned 16... Moosepoop Feb 2013 #240
So we've established that your preferred age for defacto adulthood among men is 16. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #254
"Nude woman" and "Stripper" are qualitatively different. Cal Carpenter Feb 2013 #13
Ya know it just not that hard to follow the law lunatica Feb 2013 #20
Exactly. Are people here for a political discussion or a moral one? Cal Carpenter Feb 2013 #28
I think it's endangering the welfare of a child to expose them to sexually explicit material. Nine Feb 2013 #22
But it's just a naked woman Atman Feb 2013 #29
No--it's a sex worker touching a minor, procured by the parent. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #36
The crime is endangerment of the welfare of a minor. Nine Feb 2013 #71
how do nudists fit in? jollyreaper2112 Feb 2013 #26
the OP thinks casual nudity is the same as a sexually charged performance intended to excite. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #33
Don't tell me what the OP thinks, thank you. Atman Feb 2013 #37
You claim a lap dance is the same as 'seeing boobies' and keep insisting ALL boys would dig that. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #41
I DID NOT claim a lap dance is the same as "seeing boobies!" Atman Feb 2013 #51
You post said this is all about 'seeing boobies'. Yet the photos from the story show lap dances. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #55
I've already addressed that. Atman Feb 2013 #69
Exactly Atman Feb 2013 #34
Paying a sex worker to touch your minor child is a crime, Atman. msanthrope Feb 2013 #31
Lap dancing is way beyond just "seeing boobies" Jersey Devil Feb 2013 #35
Kids as young as 13 were present., too. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #38
Have any of you noticed that I had no link or photos when I posted the story? Atman Feb 2013 #39
If it's a crime to take your son to a strip club for his 16th birthday and buy him a lap dance gollygee Feb 2013 #42
Paying a sex worker to touch your minor child is a crime. What are you not getting? msanthrope Feb 2013 #46
The CRIME is what the LAW says it is. So LOOK IT THE **** UP. WinkyDink Feb 2013 #87
You win an internet jberryhill Feb 2013 #316
Meh, I was drawing nudes at 16. big deal. Javaman Feb 2013 #44
Was the nude model paid for by your parents, did she touch you, and did others watch and take msanthrope Feb 2013 #49
Our gallery used to host "figure drawing" classes every week. Atman Feb 2013 #53
I've never seen a figure drawing class that allowed physical contact or leering at the models. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #124
maybe even talked about her "skanky snatch" since it is a known stripper term. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #128
I was upset at about 11 or less that there were no such things (to my knowledge) as RKP5637 Feb 2013 #61
From both directions, it seems. LanternWaste Feb 2013 #210
I have never been harmed by nudity. n/t Laelth Feb 2013 #52
Read the thread...we aren't talking about nudity. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #54
Interesting and clever framing by the OP, isn't it. Laelth Feb 2013 #153
As a criminal defense attorney, I have to disagree....the issue is not rearing a child as msanthrope Feb 2013 #190
NY law is not my specialty, so I will defer to you on this. Laelth Feb 2013 #196
I agree that the best solution all around may be a civil case....but here's the problem... msanthrope Feb 2013 #221
No doubt. Laelth Feb 2013 #230
Does the right to raise a child as a parent sees fit extend to... say... buying them alcohol? n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #271
Touchy subject. Laelth Feb 2013 #286
How is a nude man rubbing his crotch against a 16 year old woman-child..."endangerment"? HMMMMM?? WinkyDink Feb 2013 #68
More puritanical BS.. Upton Feb 2013 #79
Yes, a stranger's naked genitals up close is a dream come true. Post a pic of yours! WinkyDink Feb 2013 #84
To a 16 year old boy.. Upton Feb 2013 #86
Really? And would said boy like it if his friends and MOM observed his 16-yr-old boy reaction? WinkyDink Feb 2013 #89
Really? Having a woman bought and paid for by your mom to do so msanthrope Feb 2013 #92
since there are lots of grown men that do not have the desire, seabeyond Feb 2013 #94
That's right.. Upton Feb 2013 #98
because that is really not even close to saying the same thing. i too, can roll my eyes. seabeyond Feb 2013 #109
'Every boy would want this' is a sexist, and perhaps homophobic assumption. msanthrope Feb 2013 #102
exactly. further, they are not allowed to express it because men like on this thread seabeyond Feb 2013 #111
Indeed. I know grown heterosexual men who would be disgusted by this. MadrasT Feb 2013 #250
My husband would have called the police had he seen this going on. msanthrope Feb 2013 #252
most all men in my life, but a drunk brother, would have been "outraged". but then, seabeyond Feb 2013 #263
Naked women are a 16 year old boy's fantasy.. Upton Feb 2013 #95
Do you not understand that procuring sex workers for your minor child is a crime? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #97
All you keep saying is ..it's the law.. Upton Feb 2013 #107
The assumption of endangerment gollygee Feb 2013 #114
Well, this is a democracy. You can file a suit, or you can elect legislators, or heck, you can even msanthrope Feb 2013 #122
This party was also attended by girls and boys as young as 14. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #235
What kid wouldn't enjoy playing X-box every day instead of going to school? LanternWaste Feb 2013 #214
+1 Adsos Letter Feb 2013 #225
At least she didn't hire stripping clowns.... cliffordu Feb 2013 #80
Or take them to the Olive Garden, and sat them in the smoking section. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #90
With pit bulls cliffordu Feb 2013 #367
I don't know how they were endangered and it seems like no one else does either TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #91
Excuse--I know precisely why they were endangered, and I have stated it quite a few times. msanthrope Feb 2013 #96
You just recite "the law" over and over again. Atman Feb 2013 #129
13% of teens have had sex by age 15. young people have sex for the first time at about age 17, seabeyond Feb 2013 #135
I broke all the rules... Atman Feb 2013 #149
i am pointing out where what you experience is not everyones experience. you do not like that. seabeyond Feb 2013 #152
"...if you are wrong." Atman Feb 2013 #161
"So a 16 year old, already likely sexually active," YOU said this. YOU are wrong. every stat seabeyond Feb 2013 #167
No--I'm reciting the elements of the crime. Do you dispute any of those elements? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #141
The crime is an adult touching a child sexually obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #186
What are you going on about with "placeholders"? (PS - it's NOT a crime) sir pball Feb 2013 #163
Really? You can touch minors below the age of consent in NYS as long as you are wearing panties and msanthrope Feb 2013 #211
Yes, you can. Please educate yourself. sir pball Feb 2013 #226
Ahem...you are mistaken in quite a few ways. msanthrope Feb 2013 #244
That is some serious legal stretching and a couple of fails. sir pball Feb 2013 #284
Wow. You are just very wrong--- msanthrope Feb 2013 #293
What source do you have? sir pball Feb 2013 #302
Here--on the 13 year old- msanthrope Feb 2013 #329
The kids posted to Facebook. sir pball Feb 2013 #332
You don't know that. You have no idea who took pictures, who msanthrope Feb 2013 #333
You're right, I'm just thinking sir pball Feb 2013 #352
I am swinging a bit farther than I should the other way sir pball Feb 2013 #310
Really? One minor was bit on the nipple and scratched. You have that happen in from of many 13 msanthrope Feb 2013 #328
Happened to my sister sir pball Feb 2013 #330
Would you support prosecution if your daughter had been one of the kids at this party? lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #264
I think it's not so much about nudity as it is about sexual arousal R B Garr Feb 2013 #99
There's no law against "icky." Atman Feb 2013 #131
I can understand a nude woman at a supervised art/photo class involving figure studies... edbermac Feb 2013 #140
The photo shown in this thread is disgusting. Stomach turning, even. Romulox Feb 2013 #143
Why is "Really Gross" a crime? Atman Feb 2013 #157
SOCIETY is harmed by this. It's exploitative of the dancer. It's age-inappropriate Romulox Feb 2013 #164
thank you. with two boys, i so appreciate you being honest. seabeyond Feb 2013 #175
I love these guys... zaireeka Feb 2013 #248
having two sons this age, ya, i get it. and not seeing a lot of difference what they are going seabeyond Feb 2013 #267
Raising boys.... zaireeka Feb 2013 #289
my husband gives my boys this.... seabeyond Feb 2013 #314
No problem, seabeyond. I think it's a lot harder to be a kid today then when I was a boy. nt Romulox Feb 2013 #347
so true. and it makes it no easier for a parent fighting against this garbage being fed seabeyond Feb 2013 #348
I suppose you have no problem with NAMBLA, either. randome Feb 2013 #195
Intimate dances by a stripper for 5 minors under the age of 17 = Child endangerment nt Poll_Blind Feb 2013 #160
Look, this isn't complicated. Nine Feb 2013 #168
How does this have anything to do with sex workers? bettyellen Feb 2013 #169
Actually, that's a good question. Why wasn't the stripper arrested? lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #277
I read that they are considering charges against the strippers and the company. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #298
both the Mom and stripper no doubt, broke the law. i bet there will be charges brought. bettyellen Feb 2013 #300
This thread certainly was revealing. JTFrog Feb 2013 #177
you think? dlwickham Feb 2013 #188
Totally agreed. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #238
Yes...I've been trolling since 2002 just waiting for this day! Atman Feb 2013 #246
Amazing. Even for DU. n/t MadrasT Feb 2013 #251
The crime is an adult touching a child sexually obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #187
she wont be winning any mother of the year awards Smll_Ax3 Feb 2013 #201
The other spectators were not all 16 and older. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #241
Most people only read the most recent posts. Atman Feb 2013 #253
Except in this case the crime was NOT about seeing a naked woman. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #282
AUUUGH! NAKED! Atman Feb 2013 #288
Please supply me with support for your claims FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #297
I didnt read the article Smll_Ax3 Feb 2013 #256
You're just egging someone to use the "m" word, and I will oblige you. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #203
I won't call you any name in the book. You make good points. Atman Feb 2013 #218
At some point do you think 'the crime' MIGHT BE MORE THEN nudity? jmg257 Feb 2013 #228
The question of what CRIME has been answered, bighart Feb 2013 #232
The mother did not get pregnant at 14. Moosepoop Feb 2013 #272
Dear lord... Atman Feb 2013 #276
"Think up" what? Moosepoop Feb 2013 #294
QFT Blue_Tires Feb 2013 #222
yes. a very good post. and i thank the poster. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #223
Fucking A zaireeka Feb 2013 #303
As if that 16 year old boy saw anything he hadn't seen before. AndyA Feb 2013 #207
Well - HER son might not of minded. The other 13/14/15 yr olds and their folks might have. jmg257 Feb 2013 #224
endanger Billcorton Feb 2013 #212
In reality, he probably wasn't in any danger, but its still justifiably a crime. phleshdef Feb 2013 #237
Maybe it wasn't the nudity (it wasn't). Maybe it was the sexual contact with various juveniles? jmg257 Feb 2013 #245
Here is the relevant law. Nine Feb 2013 #249
That tells me nothing. Atman Feb 2013 #257
Hmm...We, the people...through our chosen representatives? jmg257 Feb 2013 #266
Now I know you are just playing with us. Nine Feb 2013 #291
Yes--that's it. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #259
ATMAN I am going to give you some friendly advice. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #255
Ive been here for more than a decade. Atman Feb 2013 #258
That is your choice. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #261
I can't believe this is such an issue! Atman Feb 2013 #269
Your terminology is incorrect. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #283
I also want you to be aware there are three different threads in META about you post right now. hrmjustin Feb 2013 #299
Make an example of you? You're embarrassing bettyellen Feb 2013 #281
ok bigapple1963 Feb 2013 #268
Creepy sdlcman Feb 2013 #270
they were giving the boys lap dances shanti Feb 2013 #273
I would if I were a 16 year old boy. Atman Feb 2013 #279
I don't think a nude woman endangers a 16-year-old boy LittleBlue Feb 2013 #274
A teen CHOOSING to sneak into a strip club for a "peek" is quite different FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #290
Some of them at least made it public in a way sir pball Feb 2013 #307
A 14 yr old girl may "love" having sex with her 27 (or 35 or 42) yr old boyfriend FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #318
A young girl being sexually exploited by a man 15 years her senior sir pball Feb 2013 #327
"the kids in the room intensely uncomfortable," what fuckin' right does an adult have to put a seabeyond Feb 2013 #331
And they were charged appropriately sir pball Feb 2013 #336
Yup! obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #342
Victoria's Secret models do not grind on the watcher's crotch. FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #337
because one is a boy and one is a girl. and they are sexually SOOO much different. seabeyond Feb 2013 #340
That's an awful lot of conflation sir pball Feb 2013 #374
It is exactly the same thing obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #341
Not in 30 states. sir pball Feb 2013 #356
Except, as has been pointed out countless times, not all the kids were 16 FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #358
I think the internet has quite prepared them for this type of exposure LittleBlue Feb 2013 #346
What harm...? zaireeka Feb 2013 #359
Perfectly stated. n/t FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #366
And your daughter, going to a party where she is subjected to her peers recieving lap dances? FedUpWithIt All Feb 2013 #363
Depends what the statute considers danger. Deep13 Feb 2013 #275
AAAUUUGGGHHH! BOOBIES! Atman Feb 2013 #278
So you think there is no such law? Deep13 Feb 2013 #285
Why do you keep insinuating she only got arrested for 'boobies'? jmg257 Feb 2013 #287
So you're sure it was forced? No one could leave? Atman Feb 2013 #292
There you go again - IT WAS NOT "SEEING A NAKED WOMEN"! jmg257 Feb 2013 #296
How does a lap dance endanger a teenage boy? backscatter712 Feb 2013 #306
Well - let's see - it is 1)apparently illegal. jmg257 Feb 2013 #315
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #320
Persistent dumb ass at that..."16 year old young man saw a stripper". More then that though, right? jmg257 Feb 2013 #325
There was no nudity, yet you claim it is all about nudity. A crime is what the law says is a crime. Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #334
I'll explain it to you again. We the people don't like it when other people's jmg257 Feb 2013 #305
How does superficial sexual contact endanger him? backscatter712 Feb 2013 #308
Not sure. Why don't you ask the parents who signed the compliants about THIER jmg257 Feb 2013 #311
Now you're a mindreader? Nine Feb 2013 #317
Stop dwelling on the "danger" part of the statute. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2013 #335
Doesn't matter if it endangered him. It probably broke the law. onenote Feb 2013 #371
And I think anybody arguing against THAT charge is an underreactive idiot sir pball Feb 2013 #313
Agree. She will be lucky if all she gets is an endangerment charge. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2013 #338
And if the boobies on display were those of a 16 year old girl onenote Feb 2013 #369
Hmmmm.... Taverner Feb 2013 #280
I think this might be more appropriate for this thread ... JoePhilly Feb 2013 #295
Ridiculous charge. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #304
Because YOU said so. nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #339
this threads reminds me of the stupidity DonCoquixote Feb 2013 #309
+1 obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #344
Why does everyone object to this woman trying to earn a living? Orrex Feb 2013 #343
If this thread illustrates anything... Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #350
What your post illustrates is that you don't know what happened. It is not what they SAW. DevonRex Feb 2013 #357
I wrote... (cont) Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #362
Ice cream, Mandrake! Children's ice cream! kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #354
I went on an optional Saturday "cultural" field trip to SF's North Beach in the late 60s PufPuf23 Feb 2013 #355
Here's a picture the lapdance and one of "Mom" having sex on the beach... NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #360
If the stripper was displaying her body in a sexually stimulative way aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2013 #364
Reading through this thread ismnotwasm Feb 2013 #365
Maybe it isn't the best idea for a 16 yo to see a woman objectified so? pepperbear Feb 2013 #370
Message auto-removed time 4 me to fly Feb 2013 #372
Every child is different JuniperLea Feb 2013 #376
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #86