Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rachel1

(538 posts)
2. Freddy Martin, a 9-year-old, was thrown off the building rooftop by a 17-year-old
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 07:48 PM
Feb 2013

named Casmine Aska, the landlords did NOTHING to stop it, and now Freddy Martin's family is suffering because of the landlords' negligence.

This is an open-and-shut case which seems to overwhelmingly favor the side of Freddy Martin's family.

Apartment buildings always had stairs leading up to the flat roof Warpy Feb 2013 #1
Freddy Martin, a 9-year-old, was thrown off the building rooftop by a 17-year-old rachel1 Feb 2013 #2
When I was a kid in the Bronx, MY landlord sat on the roof, day and night, marybourg Feb 2013 #4
Thank you! Warpy Feb 2013 #5
So, it's a joke to you that a 9-year-old child was allowed be injured, if not murdered, because rachel1 Feb 2013 #6
Could you elaborate on the landlord's reckless behavior? marybourg Feb 2013 #7
The landlords have done nothing to prevent people from falling off or being thrown off rachel1 Feb 2013 #12
The only person behaving recklessly liberalhistorian Feb 2013 #10
The landlords could've installed safety mechanisms & implemented safety policies to prevent people rachel1 Feb 2013 #16
what would you suggest? ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2013 #25
Just because you use the word "Child" doesn't make your argument valid FreakinDJ Feb 2013 #15
How is it reckless of the landlord when this is how most building rooftops are and have always been? alphafemale Feb 2013 #27
How about a guard wall? BainsBane Feb 2013 #22
actually, railings and guard walls ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2013 #26
"Tar Beach" was a famous resort when I lived in Bronx and Manhattan apartments... BillF Feb 2013 #18
Yeah, that's what it sounds like to me, too Warpy Feb 2013 #21
Are there building codes or rental regulations that specify roof access petronius Feb 2013 #3
That is the relevant question. redqueen Feb 2013 #11
If access to the roof was not properly secured, and the roof had no safety devices to keep Ikonoklast Feb 2013 #8
but this was a case of someone throwing someone off JI7 Feb 2013 #14
And if access to the roof was secured, the kid would never have been able to go up on the roof. Ikonoklast Feb 2013 #17
what do you mean by secured ? like not let people up there ? JI7 Feb 2013 #19
Locked, alarmed, limited access to any egress to the roof other than by authorized personnel.... Ikonoklast Feb 2013 #23
I can assure you that tenants in the Bronx marybourg Feb 2013 #29
Why are they suing the landlord instead of the liberalhistorian Feb 2013 #9
yes, it's like when starbucks was sued JI7 Feb 2013 #13
Totally agree 100% with you. OceanEcosystem Feb 2013 #20
Deep pockets nt ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #30
Really? And who should be paying for 24/7 security? TheMadMonk Feb 2013 #24
Why was their 9 yo outside unsupervised by parents? idwiyo Feb 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Family of Boy Thrown from...»Reply #2