Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Everything reported is strictly legal, just as Hitler’s extermination of the Jews was legal" [View all]Laelth
(32,017 posts)42. That's a pretty serious charge. I will leave it at that. n/t
-Laelth
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Everything reported is strictly legal, just as Hitler’s extermination of the Jews was legal" [View all]
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
OP
I have noticed lots of posters prefer to attack the messenger rather than address the content.
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#2
Physicians have always been free to prescribe off-label, as the article notes. The article is about
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#5
Recursion: peer reviewed journals are no longer as pristine and reliable as they once were
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#15
yes, they're being corrupted, and it's so much trouble to do trials, pharmacorps would like to
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#23
The corruption of the science gives the lie to "the sales rep was quoting peer-reviewed journals"
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#26
in this case, however, the rep was saying things like "it's safer than salt," & "it's safe for
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#32
True. But, sadly, there are many drugs not tested on kids that are being prescribed
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#34
here's a better one, & i don't think you understand what pharmacorps are doing here. what they
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#13
Free speech is now a "corporate personhood right" that equals the right to misinform consumers.
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#16
maybe you could try rebutting the facts, then. rather than just disparaging the source.
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#8
Even oddball sources have their uses, especially if backup documentation can be found
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#20
The problem, Cleita, is that the Nazis are demons in the American psyche, not people with evil ideas
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#38
I'm not quarreling with you, but my disagreement is with your conception of the First Amendment
GiaGiovanni
Feb 2013
#44
or it could have something to do with right-wingers & neoliberals pushing their agenda, and
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#40
Scaife-funded foundation pushing deregulation of Pharma as first amendment issue. How
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#43