Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
59. I like President Obama and his agenda. Therefore I want ZERO change from it.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:14 PM
Feb 2013

I don't consider it a lesser of two evils.

I consider it an honor to vote for President Obama's agenda forever more.

I never in my life thought I would see a President Obama and I sure as hell don't want to change from it now that I got it.

He is directly the same in 2013 terms as my other favorites before him.

2000 showed what happened to sitting on ones hands, voting 3rd party and not voting for the choice in SCOTUS alone.
And no matter all the lines heard, Gore would not have nominated Alito and Roberts and Scalia and Thomas.

So it made bogus any other claim from anyone.

IMHO.

Because the other side is worse, and nothing will ever be perfect.

and corporations are not bad. A Bad corporation is good. A good corporation is good.
again

IMHO and the majority amount of nationwide voters, and a landslide of democratic voters.

If there are bad CEOs, get rid of those CEOs.
Bad bankers(whatever a banker means, because tellers are bankers too and they make $11 an hour) should be fired, good bankers hired.
And corporations have shareholders.

If shareholders complain enough or see enough, then they change.

Has nothing to do with the democratic party whatsoever.

No one has to worry. Hillary45 is definite IMHO and a done deal. She won. Take it to the bank. graham4anything Feb 2013 #1
Just got an email... pinboy3niner Feb 2013 #2
RE is ex Goldman Sachs. It is no wonder he is attacking the Chicago school system, health care, etc. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #41
Add me to the list of people who would NEVER EVER vote for Rahm for anything. This man is Nay Feb 2013 #51
And he'd get the nod from the Party Bosses, too. Le Taz Hot Feb 2013 #3
I don't think he stands a chance cali Feb 2013 #4
Umm, no. blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #5
No. Please. Just no. mnhtnbb Feb 2013 #6
i wouldn't worry about him, watch his Speech at the Dem Convention last year JI7 Feb 2013 #7
lol. Democracyinkind Feb 2013 #8
If he somehow slithered onto the ticket I would not vote deutsey Feb 2013 #9
If Rahm thinks he can inspire the liberal vote demwing Feb 2013 #10
LOL! Nay Feb 2013 #53
Rahm you say? Is Mitt unavailable? Or is he gonna run as a Democrat? nt silvershadow Feb 2013 #11
I could never vote for a republican, even a moderate one like Emanuel. nt Zorra Feb 2013 #12
I think Americans are ready for an FDR Democrat MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #13
We really need to run our own candidate. dotymed Feb 2013 #16
You do realize neither Rahm, Elizabeth, Alan will run if Hillary45 runs. graham4anything Feb 2013 #33
IMO, it is terrible that people vote party before candidate. dotymed Feb 2013 #50
I like President Obama and his agenda. Therefore I want ZERO change from it. graham4anything Feb 2013 #59
Which Americans? AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #29
Agree. Warren is so great! ananda Feb 2013 #31
I know I am n/t Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #63
I'm for Elizabeth Warren. tclambert Feb 2013 #14
I'd vote for a ticket headed by Warren in a heartbeat. Skidmore Feb 2013 #15
Oh heck no I will not be voting for this clown Coolest Ranger Feb 2013 #17
What an ego customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #18
No vote here. rosesaylavee Feb 2013 #19
OMG! Get out the garlic! HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #20
Obama did, when he choose his cabinet. PassingFair Feb 2013 #48
Rahm is a sure loser. I, for one, sit out any election where that asshole is the nominee. rateyes Feb 2013 #21
And the hits just keep coming, MadHound Feb 2013 #22
Too many negatives...that's a loser from the word "go". nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #23
No. Not even VP. countmyvote4real Feb 2013 #24
Which party? Certainly not Democrat. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #25
yea that is my thought too dembotoz Feb 2013 #26
I'm voting for the other guy, And I don't care who it is. Autumn Feb 2013 #27
I wouldn't vote for him either. He has a temper and just like the NJ governor you southernyankeebelle Feb 2013 #28
Just what we Don't need CanonRay Feb 2013 #30
As long as he runs as a Republican, I'm OK with it. nt bemildred Feb 2013 #32
I can't stand the man and will work hard to see him not in the running Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #34
Rahm Emanual LWolf Feb 2013 #35
Rahm's Got Plenty To Keep Him Busy In Chicago... KharmaTrain Feb 2013 #36
He would be one of the ones I'd definitively be against davidpdx Feb 2013 #37
He used to work for Goldman Sachs. Now Goldman Sachs have power in Greece and Italy Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #38
Emanuel/Bloomberg Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #39
LOL. Starry Messenger Feb 2013 #40
he'd get the anti-labor vote. Also a solid lock on the privatization profiteers Dragonfli Feb 2013 #47
Well, unions are pretty key to GOTV. Starry Messenger Feb 2013 #49
If he somehow gets the nomination, I'd vote for him. sadbear Feb 2013 #42
Vanity candidate. He just want to raise some bucks. n/t FSogol Feb 2013 #43
If Hillary doesn't run I would support him in a heart beat. tritsofme Feb 2013 #44
Oh gawd no! City Lights Feb 2013 #45
What chance does he have of taking the Republican primary? Dragonfli Feb 2013 #46
that guy is a scumbag motherfucker datasuspect Feb 2013 #52
Wha? Good Lord, why? TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #54
I would never vote for him bigwillq Feb 2013 #55
He'd probably be booed the way Joementum was. Arugula Latte Feb 2013 #56
He's an anti-labor, anti-public school "Democrat" Greybnk48 Feb 2013 #57
I'd vote for Rmoney before Rahm! fredamae Feb 2013 #58
Can we make this the "official", rahm can go fuck himself, thread? Arctic Dave Feb 2013 #60
As previously said here -- Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2013 #61
Not sure if this asshole will get another term as mayor were not in love here in Chicago trublu992 Feb 2013 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh, no effin' way! ABC W...»Reply #59