Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
7. Or lose your RKBA. Or lose voting rights. Or be refused as a witness.
Thu Feb 14, 2013, 04:14 PM
Feb 2013

Lotta reasons to be scared of the doctor's office -- especially his computer.

If nothing else, that would be a great way to stop people from seeking help Duer 157099 Feb 2013 #1
Bingo. Due process is key. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #2
"Due process" is a legal term zipplewrath Feb 2013 #11
That's a pretty egregious violation of civil rights. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #17
So the devil is in the details zipplewrath Feb 2013 #36
Have you invented an eye chart... meaculpa2011 Feb 2013 #37
Sounds good but wont work legaleagle_45 Feb 2013 #53
As there are zipplewrath Feb 2013 #68
Great way to blacklist them from various other things as well Posteritatis Feb 2013 #23
exactly. nt lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #45
Sure, I won't get help because I'm worried I might not be able to buy a gun someday snooper2 Feb 2013 #48
One of the most disturbing things I've ever seen proposed here. cali Feb 2013 #3
ditto Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #4
I'd love to peruse that database* didact Feb 2013 #55
Seeking help for depression at 17 years old...have trouble getting a job NightWatcher Feb 2013 #5
Or lose your RKBA. Or lose voting rights. Or be refused as a witness. Glaug-Eldare Feb 2013 #7
because databases never get hacked or used for evil reasons. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #6
No way! Are_grits_groceries Feb 2013 #8
We really need national mental health care, first. n/t Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #9
Yes, at the very least. cbayer Feb 2013 #15
So which "major mental illnesses" would you suggest we single out as not being healthy enough to own cbdo2007 Feb 2013 #10
As a mental health practitioner I think this is generally pointless and potentially dangerous. nolabear Feb 2013 #12
Excellent response, nolabear sibelian Feb 2013 #20
What do you think of NY database hack89 Feb 2013 #22
I also must by law report a real threat. I don't know about the NY database. nolabear Feb 2013 #34
AA would cease to exist loyalsister Feb 2013 #27
That's why they're anonymous. It's the only way some people can tolerate it. nolabear Feb 2013 #35
I know... loyalsister Feb 2013 #43
Maybe, but it's private, non profit, and likely wouldn't be possible. nolabear Feb 2013 #67
I have access to mental health records.... cbdo2007 Feb 2013 #39
Not a mental health issue, but... pipi_k Feb 2013 #40
I can't even begin to describe what insurance companies put us and our patients through. nolabear Feb 2013 #60
+1 tallahasseedem Feb 2013 #62
What Nolabear said +1000 cliffordu Feb 2013 #66
IMO, this is a bad idea. City Lights Feb 2013 #13
This is a very, very slippery slope. cbayer Feb 2013 #14
Actually, there is a database. At least for anyone treated through insurance - lynne Feb 2013 #16
HIPPA loyalsister Feb 2013 #28
And very serious consequences for violating it. cbayer Feb 2013 #31
My wife is a nurse. Waltons_Mtn Feb 2013 #54
"She told me she could be personally sued" loyalsister Feb 2013 #56
I totally agree. Waltons_Mtn Feb 2013 #59
What about people pipi_k Feb 2013 #18
Can you say, "unitended consequences?" markpkessinger Feb 2013 #19
Most fans of this sort of thing intend those extra consequences. Posteritatis Feb 2013 #25
I think it starts with having a bias or disregard for people who have mental illnesses in the first loyalsister Feb 2013 #29
NY plans such a data base. nt hack89 Feb 2013 #21
NY plans and does absurd things with nary a raised eyebrow. TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #30
Completely agree Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #44
No due process. So no. n/t X_Digger Feb 2013 #24
Great idea for keeping lots of records about mentally ill people... sibelian Feb 2013 #26
Not. Squinch Feb 2013 #32
Reads like a call to strike-out at what is feared rather than what is known HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #33
Never,if repukes had access to that database it would be abused like no one can imagine libtodeath Feb 2013 #38
+1 n/t Lady Freedom Returns Feb 2013 #47
How about one with every detail, full medical records, etc. of everyone's life? Coyotl Feb 2013 #41
Thie is practically impossible ..Here's why. SoCalDem Feb 2013 #42
The responses to the OP really encourage me. Denninmi Feb 2013 #46
I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #49
One person's national mental health database is another person's list of "undesirables"..... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #50
One person's nmh database is another's vein of gold...and gold veins get mined. HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #63
Like Duer 157099 said, this will backfire. OceanEcosystem Feb 2013 #51
Uh, . . . NO!! patrice Feb 2013 #52
What we need is comprehensive, universally accessible, WHOLE-PERSON Health CARE & a patrice Feb 2013 #57
What we need are more of these and fewer churches: patrice Feb 2013 #58
Who needs a database to know coveting an UZI is a problem for society? Hoyt Feb 2013 #61
Sure. You can give all of us tattoos to make it easier to identify us. cliffordu Feb 2013 #64
Well with that kind of logic Sivafae Feb 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We really need a national...»Reply #7