Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,974 posts)
52. well, I think your post was as baiting as the hacker's intent
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 03:43 PM
Feb 2013

I think it's foolish to try and leverage this argument about CISPA, the NDAA, and the TPP on top of this foolish threat of theirs; either by 'Anonymous' or by you on this thread. It's a foolish expectation that I'm going to engage in that today.

Controlling the internet to protest controlling the internet arcane1 Feb 2013 #1
They are far from "controlling" the Internet. kentauros Feb 2013 #35
That is beyond their capabilities. They have a big bag of parlor tricks... EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #55
That's been my impression of them pretty much from the start. kentauros Feb 2013 #59
I'm with you on this... arthritisR_US Feb 2013 #2
I'll join you. HappyMe Feb 2013 #6
I love your hair on fire guy.. arthritisR_US Feb 2013 #9
The minute I HappyMe Feb 2013 #12
yes, hair on fire guy is cool, i just saved it for special occassions arely staircase Feb 2013 #76
Much of it is regarding CISPA, which was resurrected and voted upon without warning just days ago. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #3
I agree there's a larger and important issue they say they're advocating here bigtree Feb 2013 #15
Martin Luther King, Jr. has words on this subject. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #22
+++++ :) RainbowSuperfund Feb 2013 #24
never knew MLK to advocate anything like this bigtree Feb 2013 #25
So you're okay with CISPA, the NDAA, the TPP...and citizens shouldn't protest what is abhorrent? n/t Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #32
how foolish of you bigtree Feb 2013 #37
I'm attempting to address what you've listed as being concerns, I'm not attempting to argue Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #47
well, I think your post was as baiting as the hacker's intent bigtree Feb 2013 #52
I've been involved in an unpleasant post war in another thread against my better judgement, Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #56
Protest all you want. RudynJack Feb 2013 #38
CISPA and its ilk do not appear on any ballot. The people do not get to vote on such things. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #46
So your answer RudynJack Feb 2013 #48
Have you read my link to the ACLU description of this monstrous legislation? Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #50
We're not discussing the legislation. RudynJack Feb 2013 #61
The people have fought this through the system, and momentarily won. Now they're sneaking it back Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #62
At what point is the SOTU address ours and not theirs? randome Feb 2013 #63
Then you should totally start a thread on it! RudynJack Feb 2013 #66
Despite Protests, Congress To Bring Back CISPA Exactly As It Was Last Year, While Obama Signs Exec O Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #51
Who voted on it a couple of days ago? And what did they vote on? onenote Feb 2013 #45
You have a google button on your computer as well as I, but I'll indulge you: Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #49
Thanks for confirming that it hasn't been voted on. Its only being reintroduced tomorrow. onenote Feb 2013 #73
I stand corrected. I was mistaking last year's vote for one very recent. n/t Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #74
At the beginning I supported them Drale Feb 2013 #4
Same here. We have 3 RW cranksters working on disrupting the SOTU. Nugent, Rand, etc. freshwest Feb 2013 #23
+1 I agree SlimJimmy Feb 2013 #27
Stuff like this is just not helpful to them. libtodeath Feb 2013 #5
It's a risky move for them. Xithras Feb 2013 #7
Only if they replace the live feed with some message that brings attention to issues arcane1 Feb 2013 #10
Not necessarily Xithras Feb 2013 #14
If I saw something other than HappyMe Feb 2013 #17
This was predictable. Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #8
I have to say I like it Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #11
"Democracy" translates to "the will and voice of the People". It's not Democracy if "they" Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #13
I'm trying to imagine how a group unaccountable to most Americans bigtree Feb 2013 #18
The powers that be aren't listening (or, they are, if you know about HR347). Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #20
I'm with you on that Fire Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #26
Then we don't live in a democracy. They rarely listen to "We, the people". AAO Feb 2013 #70
Here is an ACLU report on CISPA, which everyone should be upset about. Please read if you don't know Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #16
I think this group forfeits the expectation that someone should heed their concerns and dialog bigtree Feb 2013 #21
The ACLU is ProSense Feb 2013 #54
I believe some Anonymous channels have posted that CISPA's re-emergence is enough in itself. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #71
Too bad no one owns televisions anymore Freddie Stubbs Feb 2013 #19
"anti-democratic" with a small "D"? Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #28
I prefer this assembly to the alternative bigtree Feb 2013 #31
The alternative is a parliamentary system Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #40
Tsk. Tsk. How dare people express their dismay at having their freedoms curbed. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #29
it would be like you obliviating my posts bigtree Feb 2013 #33
See 1st Amerndment for reference. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #34
one can forget that within those rights bigtree Feb 2013 #41
Are you talking about the suppression of speech by the NDAA or by the protesters? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #43
degrees bigtree Feb 2013 #44
Nice straw argument. How about something more honest? nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #57
Smells like another "roll up" to me. MADem Feb 2013 #30
ROGER THAT MADem! dreampunk Feb 2013 #69
odd how DU loves anonymous until it interrupts the great dems PR machine lol nt msongs Feb 2013 #36
funny bigtree Feb 2013 #42
Or, how DU loves them unless they act like assholes. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #58
Do you really laugh out loud at your own comments? Drunken Irishman Feb 2013 #68
'Anonymous' is not a group with motivations SecularMotion Feb 2013 #39
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has done more for Internet freedom in a legal way. nt EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #53
There ya go! kentauros Feb 2013 #64
Anonymous has overstepped its bounds with this. kestrel91316 Feb 2013 #60
Agree with you. I'm usually a supporter of theirs, but this is stupid and childish. gateley Feb 2013 #65
Anonymous is a lawless reaction to authoritarianism. JDPriestly Feb 2013 #67
I am of the mind that it is a highly "lawful" recruiting agency run by MADem Feb 2013 #72
so i'm not gonna get to see it? thanks, anonymous assholes! arely staircase Feb 2013 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm generally okay with t...»Reply #52