General Discussion

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)

12. Because killing in mass quantities is better when properly papered over?

Reply to WinkyDink (Reply #11)

Mon Feb 11, 2013, 08:36 PM

Feb 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bush's illegal Iraq invasion. How does it compare to a drone strike? [View all] ProSense Feb 2013 OP

Iraq invasion was much worse Enrique Feb 2013 #1

Wait ProSense Feb 2013 #5

Many Congressional Democrats voted to invade Iraq MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #2

Are you saying ProSense Feb 2013 #4

How did Bush violate the IWR? MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #6

"Even if the war was legal" Was it? n/t ProSense Feb 2013 #7

YOU are claiming it was not. nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #9

You evidently aren't ProSense Feb 2013 #13

Republican George W. Bush said those words in the State of the Union gulliver Feb 2013 #28

Yes, that was clearly a lie. MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #29

"So I'd have to go with not illegal." ProSense Feb 2013 #31

Will you please stop putting words in my mouth? MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #32

You said: "So I'd have to go with not illegal." ProSense Feb 2013 #33

While I support your intention I dont know if I agree about the legality. rhett o rick Feb 2013 #53

OMG, what have you done? You've branded him an, an "apologist". rhett o rick Feb 2013 #51

This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Feb 2013 #30

well, yea, the Iraq invasion was far worse quinnox Feb 2013 #3

I will defecate and allow you to choose the smallest turd to carry in your hand. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2013 #8

I like that, and I agree. Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #15

I get it ProSense Feb 2013 #16

So two wrongs make a right libtodeath Feb 2013 #10

Because of some stupid fucking post equating Zoeisright Feb 2013 #46

Casualties ought not be the criterion. Constitutional legality ought to be. WinkyDink Feb 2013 #11

Because killing in mass quantities is better when properly papered over? quaker bill Feb 2013 #12

really ? i think it should matter JI7 Feb 2013 #14

Both encourage injured parties to theaocp Feb 2013 #17

Bullshit! ProSense Feb 2013 #20

The world knows, huh? theaocp Feb 2013 #22

Oh boy ProSense Feb 2013 #23

Spare yourself. theaocp Feb 2013 #24

Exactly. +100000 whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #25

No, that's ProSense Feb 2013 #26

It goes back to my original response to your question. theaocp Feb 2013 #54

Aw, don't you worry about it. Obama let Bush get away with his illegal war. MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #18

At least you acknowledge that it was illegal. n/t ProSense Feb 2013 #21

Oh that? That was fine! Turbineguy Feb 2013 #19

I think this is as false a comparison as the one you argued Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #27

Drone strikes are the Bush Doctrine with a light footprint. morningfog Feb 2013 #34

No, ProSense Feb 2013 #36

Pre-emption by any other name smells just as bloody. morningfog Feb 2013 #37

Wait ProSense Feb 2013 #38

I would appreciate you not putting words in my mouth. Thanks. morningfog Feb 2013 #39

I did no such thing. ProSense Feb 2013 #41

You continue to muddy the waters. You use the term "terrorist," morningfog Feb 2013 #42

No, you are the ProSense Feb 2013 #43

Al-Qaeda is not a monolithic organization. morningfog Feb 2013 #44

What exactly ProSense Feb 2013 #45

You are almost there. morningfog Feb 2013 #48

Hey, ProSense Feb 2013 #49

No. You dodge, deflect and ignore the issues. Best of luck to you and your agenda. morningfog Feb 2013 #50

No I didn't, you ProSense Feb 2013 #52

Pre-emption is policy. You can't deny it. morningfog Feb 2013 #55

What do you call an American citizen who joins with a group like al-Qaeda who wants to kill Thinkingabout Feb 2013 #35

As you said, there is NO comparison jazzimov Feb 2013 #40

Now that you put it like that, I can see that they are totally equivalent Hekate Feb 2013 #47