Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: See, Here's the Thing. [View all]

sheshe2

(83,728 posts)
32. First, I have implied nothing. I have posted excerpts from a Linked blog by "immasmartypants".
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:24 AM
Feb 2013

You can read it, you can agree or disagree. Your choice. Your freedom of speech.

You also say:
"You do realize you are implying that progressives and I would assume
liberals were for intervention in Syria and against lowering our number of nuclear weapons."

No disrespect intended, however you are also saying, I "assume"... you know what they say about the definition of that word is...to Assume, makes an ASS out of U and Me. I have assumed nothing!

You go on:
"Please link to a post that supports your implication."

Once again your are saying that I implied something! No, I did not.

Again:
"I think you have hopped on the bash progressives and liberals wagon and just want to add fuel. Shame on you."

Shame on ME? Really, as a liberal myself I hardly think I would be bashing myself over the head! Unless of course you are calling me a right winger.......oh you already did......

"I can remember when this wasn't a right wing web site."





See, Here's the Thing. [View all] sheshe2 Feb 2013 OP
I Don't Think Any President Gets Much Press for NOT Going to War dballance Feb 2013 #1
You know what's bizarre? ProSense Feb 2013 #2
Sigh, They are the Ship of Fools. sheshe2 Feb 2013 #3
Much better than how a Mittens presidency would look: freshwest Feb 2013 #8
“prevent outer space from becoming an area of conflict.” sheshe2 Feb 2013 #26
Well, you know, Mitt allegedly has an extra-terrestrial home. Just sayin' freshwest Feb 2013 #27
With that title, I can only imagine. sheshe2 Feb 2013 #33
Yeah, I think what people prefer is sibelian Feb 2013 #6
Yes, DU has its coterie of constitutional scholars. randome Feb 2013 #13
And it's often the same ones hating on the U.N. and thus enabling the evilness of the IMF!! patrice Feb 2013 #28
+1 treestar Feb 2013 #36
I was glad to hear of that Enrique Feb 2013 #4
Our President is anti-war; don't you see that? babylonsister Feb 2013 #5
if he armed the Syrian rebels Enrique Feb 2013 #9
Are you ProSense Feb 2013 #10
i am against arming them Enrique Feb 2013 #14
Oh goody ProSense Feb 2013 #17
you're setting up a fictitious scenario, and criticizing people for doing something they didn't do BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #42
i was actually demonstrably wrong Enrique Feb 2013 #44
oh ok..thank you BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #45
Has he armed the Syrian rebels? babylonsister Feb 2013 #11
no Enrique Feb 2013 #15
I prefer this... sheshe2 Feb 2013 #21
i agree Enrique Feb 2013 #23
Speak softly and carry a big stick sheshe2 Feb 2013 #24
Yes, he is. Kath1 Feb 2013 #39
k&r nt steve2470 Feb 2013 #7
Not engaging in a 3rd war is now "moving the ball significantly in the Progressive direction", huh. Bonobo Feb 2013 #12
+1 Sadness exceeded only by its outrageous, enraging absurdity. nt woo me with science Feb 2013 #16
The OP ProSense Feb 2013 #18
Thanks for bringing that exerpt over, ProSense... sheshe2 Feb 2013 #22
You do realize you are implying that progressives and I would assume A Simple Game Feb 2013 #19
First, I have implied nothing. I have posted excerpts from a Linked blog by "immasmartypants". sheshe2 Feb 2013 #32
Well said. Quite a reach there. BTW: freshwest Feb 2013 #34
An Obama Kitteh! Sweet! sheshe2 Feb 2013 #41
the flip side of this story is that Hillary pushed for the intervention Enrique Feb 2013 #20
If McCain had been elected Mr.Bill Feb 2013 #25
Absolutely. Kath1 Feb 2013 #31
+1 freshwest Feb 2013 #35
That's what I like about Obama. Kath1 Feb 2013 #29
Thank you Kath! sheshe2 Feb 2013 #37
He is quietly dedicated to getting this turned around. Not a bully as some appear to want. freshwest Feb 2013 #38
Such a refreshing response to conflict after Bush and Reagan. Kath1 Feb 2013 #40
you are so right...so is the post you're replying to. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #43
Thanks for the positive news. The drones and excessive surveillance still need fixing. JDPriestly Feb 2013 #30
President Obama is only getting Cha Feb 2013 #46
P.S. Thanks for Cha Feb 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»See, Here's the Thing.»Reply #32