Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
19. Just off the top of my head
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:47 PM
Feb 2013

after reading that, there were over 250,000 in Guatemala which isn't mentioned there and the number for Vietnam, according to Robert McNamara is 3.6 - 3.8 million. I believe the figure for Indonesia is 1.5 million. Then we've got places where we don't even bother to count like Colombia, El Salvador, the Congo. And all those little places where the numbers are in the low thousands, hundreds.

250,000 here, 4 million there, another million here, 10,000 here and pretty soon, six million actually seems rather low. But whatever the number is, it's much too high.

I see with your point about covert but first, that's in the uploader's description, not the lecture and 2nd, they were covert at the time because the US public didn't know about them. Congress didn't even know about all of them. Also I would include Vietnam and Korea in CIA operations because that's how they got their American start.


About the Vietnam numbers, I have no problem with McNamara's estimate because the Hanoi government released a similar number in 1995


The Agence France Presse (French Press Agency) news release of 4 April 1995 concerning the Vietnamese Government's release of official figures of dead and wounded during the Vietnam War.


HANOI (AP) - April 4. Cinq millions de morts: 20 ans apregraves la fin de la guerre du Vietnam, le gouvernement de Hanoi a reacute veacute leacute, lundi, le bilan d'un conflit dent le nombre de victimes avait eacute teacute minore a l'eacutepoque pour ne pas affecter le moral de la population.
Selon Hanoi, il y a eu pres de deux millions de morts dans la population civile du Nord et deux autres millions dans celle du Sud. Quant aux combats proprement dits, les chiffres sent d'un million cent mille militaires tueacutes et de 600.000 blesseacutes en 21 ans de guerre.

Ce dernier bilan comprend a la fois les victimes de la guerilla vietcong et les soldats nord-vietamiens qui les eacute paulaient. Les preacute ceacute dentes estimations de source occidentale faisaient eacute tat d'un bilan de 666.000 morts parmi Ies combattants Vietnamiens.

Loose Translation



The Hanoi government revealed on April 3 that the true civilian casualties of the Vietnam War were 2,000,000 in the north, and 2,000,000 in the south. Military casualties were 1.1 million killed and 600,000 wounded in 21 years of war. These figures were deliberately falsified during the war by the North Vietnamese Communists to avoid demoralizing the population.
Given a Vietnamese population of approximately 38 million during the period 1954-1975, Vietnamese casualties represent a good 12-13% of the entire population. To put this in perspective, consider that the population of the US was 220 million during the Vietnam War. Had The US sustained casualties of 13% of its population, there would have been 28 million US dead.

Anyone who thinks the US lost the Vietnam war should reconsider their definition of "lost". The North Vietnamese Communists were willing to pay any price in terms of the blood of their people to dominate the Republic of Vietnam. General Giap was not a genius: he sent his own men out to be slaughtered. The Hanoi government hid this information from their people not to avoid demoralizing them, but to avoid a rebellion among their own population. The North Vietnamese Army went to extraordinary lengths to remove their dead from the field of battle because they did not want the US to discover their true battlefield losses. Contrast this with the fact that the US government published weekly lists of killed and wounded and disseminated this accurate data to the news media.

http://alabamavva.org/stats.html


Thank you for this conversation because you got me curious enough to google him. His wiki entry was so interesting that now I want to order his books. I'd also like to find his testimony before Congress if that's available.
Sing it with me: "Wherrrre the JOBS are, some war waits for me....." WinkyDink Feb 2013 #1
Du rec. Nt xchrom Feb 2013 #2
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed... Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #3
No ifs, ands or buts about it either. Perpetual War for Perpetual *Peace* Catherina Feb 2013 #4
Agree! ReRe Feb 2013 #7
+1 woo me with science Feb 2013 #16
Six million covertly killed by CIA ops seems a bit exagerated..... reACTIONary Feb 2013 #18
Just off the top of my head Catherina Feb 2013 #19
I'm glad my post was helpful to you... reACTIONary Feb 2013 #36
I think this is a much better video in case you're interested Catherina Feb 2013 #22
Posting so that I can watch this later. Thanks. yardwork Feb 2013 #27
Part I was very good. Catherina Feb 2013 #29
Sad K&R. Overseas Feb 2013 #5
Blowback colsohlibgal Feb 2013 #6
It's quite possible you're right. PragmaticLiberal Feb 2013 #13
Absolutely. woo me with science Feb 2013 #17
Completely disagree. ProSense Feb 2013 #8
K&R ReRe Feb 2013 #9
I can't stand this woman. Beacool Feb 2013 #10
I think this country's policies in that respect have gotten out of hand. Cleita Feb 2013 #11
As if this were new... ugh. harmonicon Feb 2013 #12
Wow. If Obama's lost MHP on this issue, you know it's bad. DirkGently Feb 2013 #14
I never heard of her before Catherina Feb 2013 #20
Here Ya Go: WillyT Feb 2013 #21
Thanks Willy! Catherina Feb 2013 #24
Sorry, but the concept of "perpetual war" was initiated with the founding of the CIA in 1947.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #15
That does not invalidate her statement in the least. nt Bonobo Feb 2013 #23
Was that a serious response? nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #25
As a heart attack. nt Bonobo Feb 2013 #26
Let's see...the difference between 1947 and 2008 is 61 years.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #30
In #15 above, you said "initiated". Now you are saying "institutionalized". Bonobo Feb 2013 #33
Oh, I'm terribly sorry to have confused you.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #35
Oh bullshit. Zoeisright Feb 2013 #28
Bingo. +1000. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #32
Another "in-depth" analysis from a pundit with one of the most boring shows on MSNBC. nt EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #31
marking to read later! nt Mojorabbit Feb 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Melissa Harris-Perry: Oba...»Reply #19