Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
5. It might well have been used previously
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 08:51 PM
Feb 2013

Feinstein based her '93 legislation on stuff California passed in the late '80s, which I assume had been made an issue in the press in the years prior.

I don't know if "assault weapon" was little used term thrust into the spotlight by the press or the politicians, or if it simply gained ground as a method to differentiate between "tactical" and "sporting" guns.


I do know it is ambiguous and arbitrary; Feinstein's '93 language and her '13 language are different. In 2013, it takes fewer characteristics to be declared an "assault weapon" than before.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Right-Wing Media Won...»Reply #5