HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » When the president does i... » Reply #36
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Reply #36


Response to jeff47 (Reply #27)

Wed Feb 6, 2013, 03:25 PM

36. No, they're not equivalent. As much as you and Dubya want them to be.

I traversed this territory maybe 40 times ten years ago when the MIC had too many smart bombs on their hands and not enough countries to drop them on. The President and the U.S. Congress do not have the right to re-define war as they see fit. If you don't like it, take it up with the Congressional Research Service.

"Traditionally, peace and war have been deemed under international law to be distinctive forms of relations between states. Thus, peace has been defined as

a condition in which States maintain order and justice, solve their problems by cooperation, and eliminate violence. It is a condition in which States respect each other’ s sovereignty and equality, refrain from intervention and the threat or use of force and cooperate with one another in accordance with the treaties which they have concluded.


War, in contrast, has been described as “a condition of armed hostility between States,” “a contention, through the use of armed force, between states, undertaken for the purpose of overpowering another.” War has been said to terminate or suspend the laws and customs that prevail in peacetime and to substitute for them the laws of war. Under the traditional laws of war enemy combatants can be killed, prisoners of war taken, the enemy’s property seized or destroyed, enemy aliens interned, and other measures necessary to subdue the enemy and impose the will of the warring state taken. Moreover, the existence of a state of war traditionally has been deemed to terminate diplomatic and commercial relations and most of the treaty obligations existing between the warring States. A state of war also has brought into play the law of neutrality with respect to relations between the belligerent and non-belligerent States.
In this traditional understanding a declaration of war has been deemed, in and of itself, to have the effect of creating a state of war and changing the relationship between the states involved from one of peace to one of war. That has been the case even if no hostilities actually occur. Some question exists as to whether international law traditionally deemed a declaration of war to be a necessary prerequisite to the existence of a state of war; but it is clear that under international law a declaration of war has been viewed as “creating the legal status of war ... and giving evidence that peace has been transmuted into war, and that the law of war has replaced the law of peace.”

Authorizations for the use of force, in contrast, have not been seen as automatically creating a state of war under international law."

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL31133.pdf

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 48 replies Author Time Post
Leslie Valley Feb 2013 OP
leftstreet Feb 2013 #1
slackmaster Feb 2013 #2
Lionessa Feb 2013 #3
DJ13 Feb 2013 #8
Capt. Obvious Feb 2013 #10
DJ13 Feb 2013 #21
Lionessa Feb 2013 #25
CrispyQ Feb 2013 #31
amandabeech Feb 2013 #34
CrispyQ Feb 2013 #38
amandabeech Feb 2013 #46
Solly Mack Feb 2013 #4
n2doc Feb 2013 #5
tblue Feb 2013 #17
bvar22 Feb 2013 #6
jeff47 Feb 2013 #7
Capt. Obvious Feb 2013 #9
tblue Feb 2013 #15
Dawgs Feb 2013 #20
jeff47 Feb 2013 #30
AngryAmish Feb 2013 #32
jeff47 Feb 2013 #33
n2doc Feb 2013 #11
jeff47 Feb 2013 #29
grahamhgreen Feb 2013 #13
jeff47 Feb 2013 #28
grahamhgreen Feb 2013 #35
jeff47 Feb 2013 #43
grahamhgreen Feb 2013 #48
xtraxritical Feb 2013 #16
wtmusic Feb 2013 #19
jeff47 Feb 2013 #26
wtmusic Feb 2013 #37
jeff47 Feb 2013 #39
wtmusic Feb 2013 #45
xtraxritical Feb 2013 #47
wtmusic Feb 2013 #18
jeff47 Feb 2013 #27
LineLineLineLineReply No, they're not equivalent. As much as you and Dubya want them to be.
wtmusic Feb 2013 #36
jeff47 Feb 2013 #41
wtmusic Feb 2013 #44
baldguy Feb 2013 #12
JEB Feb 2013 #14
mlevans Feb 2013 #24
Jack Rabbit Feb 2013 #22
triplepoint Feb 2013 #23
joeybee12 Feb 2013 #40
Cleita Feb 2013 #42
Please login to view edit histories.