General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department Memo Reveals Legal Case For Drone Strikes On Americans - MSNBC [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)#1. PO's position is indefensible is an assumption based upon way less information than we can reasonably assume certain professionals have. BTW, I could accept your evaluation of PO's position on this if I EVER saw anything that demonstrates that you have actually weighed out positives compared to negatives. I have never seen anything like that from you on anything, so the conclusion that you likely are biased should not be surprising.
#2. "party alone" you assume that no one could disagree with your position, and that of those you agree with, on any basis other than party. You assume that there are no authentic rational reasons to consider somekind of necessity for drone policies, therefore anyone trying to evaluate rationally is actually just a political dupe.