Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm pro-choice but, [View all]UtahLib
(3,179 posts)21. Pro-choice with a qualifier?
It's rather cavalier to claim to be pro-choice while at the same time seeming to argue against it. I don't believe anyone would make the decision to have an abortion lightly. I, and I daresay you, have never found myself in the position of having to make such a heart rending decision. Hence, I believe it to be nearly impossible for anyone to put his or herself in the shoes of the person having to make such a decision. That seems a strong argument as to why no person should assume the right to make that decision for any other person.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Buddhists believe that the first breath is when the soul enters the body and I just read a bit ago
Mnemosyne
Feb 2013
#1
Then the earliest point should be the one taken, right? I think that's what Roe v Wade did.
Honeycombe8
Feb 2013
#24
That's against the law, unless the baby will die upon birth, or unless the fetus or birth could
Honeycombe8
Feb 2013
#51
Yes, but unfortunately wages keep getting crushed and having a baby is a huge financial burden.
JaneyVee
Feb 2013
#40
there was a time after I had an abortion that I was unsure if I had done the right thing
liberal_at_heart
Feb 2013
#61
I'm Sure the Original Poster Didn't Start the Thread so they Could get Snark From Posters Like You
dballance
Feb 2013
#6
Seemed Rather Condescending to Me and Added no Value to Discourse on the Thread
dballance
Feb 2013
#10
Actually, I Haven't Said Anything on the Topic of The Thread and Don't Intend To
dballance
Feb 2013
#19
None of that matters. Jane Roe v. Henry Wade is about controlling your own body.
RB TexLa
Feb 2013
#44
On this issue I am "center-left", while I agree there should be a choice for abortion,
DrewFlorida
Feb 2013
#54
I support Roe v. Wade's definition of this point &, btw, rape or not, is ir-relevant to the woman's
patrice
Feb 2013
#57