Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
10. It only has to have an effect on interstate commerce.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:19 PM
Feb 2013

If I buy a gun in state A that was made in state B, it will in some small way increase the demand for that state B product. And if the raw materials came from state C and the truck that delivered them drives through state D with tires made in state E....

SCOTUS has taken this view for about 200 years now.

+10000. Merely enacting stricter BG checks, while better than nothing, still ignores these weapon Hoyt Feb 2013 #1
The background checks will prevent unregulated straw men... Deep13 Feb 2013 #2
I'm not saying that back ground checks aren't important, they are. But ... Tx4obama Feb 2013 #3
The current Federal laws against straw buying aren't working now Lurks Often Feb 2013 #7
But you can still do it by calling it a personal transfer. Deep13 Feb 2013 #9
But if nobody enforces the law Lurks Often Feb 2013 #14
It is enforced. The FBI check is a precondition for a lawful... Deep13 Feb 2013 #17
I disagree as to the effectiveness of a NICS check Lurks Often Feb 2013 #20
Anyone who can get heroin will also always be able to get a gun. That's not what this is about Recursion Feb 2013 #39
Please stop with these worn out arguments. They are used by the NRA and we don't need CTyankee Feb 2013 #18
I'm not saying nothing can be done, Lurks Often Feb 2013 #19
but what I'd like to not see you stop there. It implies "oh, too bad..." and nothing more. CTyankee Feb 2013 #21
Release non-violent drug offenders Lurks Often Feb 2013 #23
Good ideas! CTyankee Feb 2013 #25
It isn't so much my theory, but Lurks Often Feb 2013 #35
And . . . it wouldn't be effective. JDPriestly Feb 2013 #4
Yup, if Congress tries to regulate in state, private sales through the Commerce Clause, Lurks Often Feb 2013 #6
It only has to have an effect on interstate commerce. Deep13 Feb 2013 #10
We're getting deep into legalese with this, Lurks Often Feb 2013 #13
The states don't have to agree. Deep13 Feb 2013 #16
Bingo. They know they will lose on something. So they offer that issue up. applegrove Feb 2013 #5
I think the opposite. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2013 #8
But my OP wasn't about which is more useful, it's about how the NRA is trying to put ... Tx4obama Feb 2013 #12
I know. I was just commenting on that particular statement. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2013 #15
If you think an AWB is useful, you'd be incorrect. krispos42 Feb 2013 #11
Let's not get into drug laws here, altho there is a huge connection in inner city violence. I just CTyankee Feb 2013 #22
Why not? krispos42 Feb 2013 #24
THis falls under the "art of the possible" which is what politics is. CTyankee Feb 2013 #29
Here is what is driving me absolutely up a wall. krispos42 Feb 2013 #37
good. Have you contacted your own reps/sens with these suggestions? CTyankee Feb 2013 #38
No,I do all my griping and such on DU. krispos42 Feb 2013 #40
well, we're not going to change the laws here at DU, are we? CTyankee Feb 2013 #41
Yes they do commit crimes because they have a gun. Zimmerman would have sat in his car without a gun Hoyt Feb 2013 #31
So says you. krispos42 Feb 2013 #36
Despite your support for Zimmie, I think he was just another chicken chit bolstered by his gun. Hoyt Feb 2013 #43
My support for Zimmerman? krispos42 Feb 2013 #44
They are relying on everyone having ADDHD... liberal N proud Feb 2013 #26
I agree. Zimmerman, Loughner, Holmes, Stawicki, etc., had legal weapons and some had permits. Hoyt Feb 2013 #27
Right, but the AWB addresses 0% of the problem Recursion Feb 2013 #32
No, a new AWB -- "A" defined as semi-autos -- will all but shut down the gun industry. Hoyt Feb 2013 #33
A semi-auto ban would accomplish something. Get somebody to introduce one (nt) Recursion Feb 2013 #34
Actually was listening to an NPR program where they had an NRA supporter nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #28
Background checks are much much much more important and a much better idea Recursion Feb 2013 #30
Fine. Get to your reps/sens and let them know EXACTLY what you have said here! CTyankee Feb 2013 #42
My Rep can't vote and I have no Senators Recursion Feb 2013 #46
That is a shame. And a national disgrace. CTyankee Feb 2013 #47
It would hurt sales to Mexican drug cartels. moondust Feb 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think one of the reason...»Reply #10