Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
31. Who does the funding? The house. that is why the need to win the house back is important.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:51 PM
Jan 2013

Personally, I myself would get rid of private schools,and just have public schools, with rotating teachers througout the district every year, to ensure all teachers teach everywhere, but I am wise enough to know that will never happen.

One can only work with what is there to be worked with.

8 years of that stress ages people enough Recursion Jan 2013 #1
W proved that it's a good idea. nt pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #2
So true. nick of time Jan 2013 #14
thats fine and dandy EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #3
lol. So you are living in "Barack Obama world" eh? redgreenandblue Jan 2013 #4
I recall some repubs making a similar argument during reagan's second term onenote Jan 2013 #5
Remember, there was no restriction until after FDR. The Repubs.changed it graham4anything Jan 2013 #6
carry it forward? green for victory Jan 2013 #8
+100 Mojorabbit Jan 2013 #27
Not true at all MattBaggins Jan 2013 #23
+1,000,000 thelordofhell Jan 2013 #30
Absolutely MattBaggins Jan 2013 #34
Should there be any minimum qualifications for someone to hold office? onenote Jan 2013 #36
Actually the age one could be lowered and would change nothing MattBaggins Jan 2013 #37
What if Bloomberg runs? Union Scribe Jan 2013 #7
I am supporting HIllary45. It's time for a woman.(being that Barack Obama can't run a 3rd time). graham4anything Jan 2013 #9
You think your one vote fishiefish Jan 2013 #10
I never waste a vote. Reading all my anti-Ralph Nader posts should make that obvious graham4anything Jan 2013 #11
Nader being a spoiler for 2000 fishiefish Jan 2013 #12
Hillary45 for the continuation of President Obama, then Michelle46 graham4anything Jan 2013 #13
You know? That's not very imaginative or forward thinking. fishiefish Jan 2013 #15
You just told him his one vote doesn't matter now you think he has the power to crown someone JaneyVee Jan 2013 #17
this shouldn't be the age of Obama. actslikeacarrot Jan 2013 #18
AMEN to that! fishiefish Jan 2013 #19
I agree liberal_at_heart Jan 2013 #20
If only Jerry Brown won in 1992, but Paul Tsongas and a smear ruined that. graham4anything Jan 2013 #22
it's not good enough anymore liberal_at_heart Jan 2013 #25
Who does the funding? The house. that is why the need to win the house back is important. graham4anything Jan 2013 #31
funding education has never been a top priority for either party liberal_at_heart Jan 2013 #39
Hmmm, imagine everyone said that. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #16
Historical side note. legaleagle_45 Jan 2013 #21
Jefferson's stupidest quote but loved by Freepers MattBaggins Jan 2013 #24
Perhaps legaleagle_45 Jan 2013 #40
I would too pauldemmd195j Jan 2013 #26
OMG Here comes the Hillary Ardent Supporters Network™ leftstreet Jan 2013 #29
Who said we live in a democracy? I thought it was a representative republic... NightWatcher Jan 2013 #28
I never said we did. I said IF we did graham4anything Jan 2013 #32
Pure Democracies are little more than mob rule NightWatcher Jan 2013 #33
A republic MattBaggins Jan 2013 #35
If you lived in a "perfect democracy", why would the president matter? hughee99 Jan 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If only we actually lived...»Reply #31