Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chart: The eight Democrats who opposed the talking filibuster [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)15. Harkin and Rockefeller are retiring.
"Correction: The 8 who it was determined could take the hit with least damage."
Why let two Democrats who are remaining in the Senate "take the hit"?
It would also be easy to let Democrats in red states "take the hit." Theory falls apart.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes. King announced during his first visit to Washington DC as a Senator-elect. nt
bluestate10
Jan 2013
#46
guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns, guns
patrice
Jan 2013
#38
A change in the balance of power is ALWAYS a possibility. Fear should not be used to do nothing.
randome
Jan 2013
#14
How might their calculation in that matter be affected by MASSIVE phone call-ins
patrice
Jan 2013
#36
P.S That is IF they had received such a thing, which apparently they didn't. nt
patrice
Jan 2013
#37
I wonder how many supporting phone calls they received. My impression was that they
patrice
Jan 2013
#35
More simply put: If they didn't have the votes, we should consider if we are looking at a fracture
patrice
Jan 2013
#39
Even if all 55 Dems had voted for the Talking Filibuster, wouldn't it have still lost?
red dog 1
Jan 2013
#45