General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The filbuster sell-out kind of explains Obama's "surprisingly liberal" inauguration speech. [View all]Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)One, Harry Reid displayed a distinct lack of spinal support during the Bush administration. Nancy Pelosi was also awfully wobbly, what with taking impeachment "off the table," and all. Since we cannot hold Reid nor Pelosi responsible for their own actions, should we blame Bush for what they decided to do in the senate?
Was Bush a strong president, coordinating the Senate as you describe - even Senators from the other party?
If so, do we then hold Obama responsible for the actions of Republican senators under his administration as well?
Doesn't that mean Clinton coordinated his own impeachment? Speaking of...
If Obama is this awful, this grotesquely committed to screwing America, shouldn't you be seeking his impeachment? Granted, since he controls the senate with an iron fist it's futile, but we really can't tolerate this sort of thing, can we?
...Or we could just hold Harry Reid responsible for what Harry Reid does.