Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tennessee GOP Lawmaker Wants To Tie Welfare Benefits To Children's Grades [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)47. The Constitution Party is a piece of work...
Hopefully, she won't have the ability to blight as many lives with them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tennessee GOP Lawmaker Wants To Tie Welfare Benefits To Children's Grades [View all]
proud2BlibKansan
Jan 2013
OP
He was also the legislator behind TN''s controversial and ill-fated "don't say gay bill" in 2012.
lunasun
Jan 2013
#3
Could someone explain how cutting payments to needy kids if they have low grades breaks the cycle of
Thinkingabout
Jan 2013
#6
How about a law tying legislative salary to passage rate of proposed legislation?
nyquil_man
Jan 2013
#16
Is this the same state where the GOP woman said hungry childern learn better? Or was it MO?
freshwest
Jan 2013
#10
while I don't believe a tn lawmaker said that, we did have Marsha Blackburn say that hammers are
okaawhatever
Jan 2013
#17
I just googled DU and it was a woman from MO. But SC had a guy who said that...
freshwest
Jan 2013
#24
Dear God, she's a special kind of evil isn't she? That just sickens me. thx nt
okaawhatever
Jan 2013
#25
Yeah, no pressure on the kid... 3rd grader gets a D, and 1 year old baby brother doesn't eat
Paulie
Jan 2013
#12
It seems to me that they despise the poor and will do anything to diminish their benefits.
Incitatus
Jan 2013
#27
It doesn't affect those making these statements, only THEM people have to worry about it
Paulie
Jan 2013
#32
Yes, put more pressure on children. The armed guards won't be nearly enough.
nyquil_man
Jan 2013
#13
The logic is that if mommy or daddy aren't going to get their check they will make sure little
okaawhatever
Jan 2013
#21
Wouldn't that essentially make the child responsible for the household income? Great
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2013
#30
Survival of the fittest, Republican style? You have a low IQ? Then you die from starvation.nt
Honeycombe8
Jan 2013
#39
here in tn....senate, house, governor....all pukes and all sucking the tea bottle....
spanone
Jan 2013
#51
High stakes testing indeed. Bad grades? No food for you... or your little brother. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2013
#61
Stacey Campfield's the same clown who claimed the Black Caucus is racist in 2005
Judi Lynn
Jan 2013
#76