General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Looks like Anonymous has hacked into the SCOTUS website - pissed about Swartz [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)but then the teapartyrepubs sabatoged Charlie
Meeks should have told others to vote for Charlie, much like Nader should have.
Meeks was never picked to win, just picked because the Dems were not challenging Charlie.
I 100% support Charlie, who spit in Jeb Bush's face
As the SOP states here,
you back democratic canddiates, or those rare instances, where the democrat CANNOT AND WILLNOT win, back the one who can win and caucus with the democratic party
Charlie had said he would caucus with the democratic party and is now a democratic candidate in good standing.
But then Charlie was always liberal in social issues.
But of course, this is a diversion from Ralph Nader and Cornel West and other 3rd party Naderites and supporters of Presidential politics
You see, your logic on charlie is like those who drone on about drones killling collateral
Meeks would have lost one on one anyhow
Just like the collateral damage done by drones(the handful) would have died with 10,000 other people by their own countrymen in a man to man (or woman to woman) war.
So instead of 10 dying from a drone
10,000 others also would die PLUS the 10 collateral from a drone
In reality, 9,990 lives are saved as 10,000 others did not die.
Blame Ralph Nader. Because well, no, Bush and Gore would not have picked the court the same, and 9-11 wouldn't have happened had Al Gore been president.
And Al Gore wouldn't have been reading about ducks in a school building on 9-11 either.